Page 1 of 1
Do the Lakers have any interest in Nate?
Posted: Tue Dec 8, 2009 10:25 pm
by Knicksick
Just wondering. If yes what kind of value would they give up?First round pick?Would they take Jeffries +Nate for Morrison,MBenga?
Jeffries is insurance in case Gasol or Odom get hurt(gives a little defense) and Nate gives you a scoring spark off the bench.
Knicks get 6 mill capspace.
Re: Do the Lakers have any interest in Nate?
Posted: Tue Dec 8, 2009 10:39 pm
by Magicontinues
Knicksick wrote:Just wondering. If yes what kind of value would they give up?First round pick?Would they take Jeffries +Nate for Morrison,MBenga?
Jeffries is insurance in case Gasol or Odom get hurt(gives a little defense) and Nate gives you a scoring spark off the bench.
Knicks get 6 mill capspace.
Lakers are looking to cut cap space right now. Doubt this would work. Nate seems to be a headcase.
Re: Do the Lakers have any interest in Nate?
Posted: Tue Dec 8, 2009 10:40 pm
by LLcoleJ
morrison and sasha, no pick. Final offer
Re: Do the Lakers have any interest in Nate?
Posted: Tue Dec 8, 2009 10:45 pm
by Knicksick
Sasha wouldn't do all that much. D'Antoni likes Jeffries so I doubt Walsh would trade him and Nate for 1mill. cap relief.
I guess the Lakers are playing too good right now and they have spent a lot of money so they would probably pass on Jeffries even if it'd bring Nate.
But Nate,Brown,Odom would be one hell of an amazing,quick,dynamic bench trio.
Re: Do the Lakers have any interest in Nate?
Posted: Tue Dec 8, 2009 10:48 pm
by DEEP3CL
Phil X wrote:morrison and sasha, no pick. Final offer
Agree with this.......plus we owe Memphis a pick to close the Pau trade, and I'm sure we don't wanna give up future picks.
Re: Do the Lakers have any interest in Nate?
Posted: Tue Dec 8, 2009 10:59 pm
by fareweatherfan
I like Nate for this team and I'm confident Phil could whip him into shape. However, he's looking to get paid next year and I don't think he's necessarily the type of player we should throw decent money at. As for this year, I say no b/c I don't agree with adding a one-year player to a championship squad.
Re: Do the Lakers have any interest in Nate?
Posted: Tue Dec 8, 2009 11:38 pm
by Frantik
I dont know what yall r talking about.... I don't like Nate for this team. Won't even give up Sasha for em! I don't like his personality. He shows off too much. Gets carried away too often, lacks discipline, and I don't want Phil to bother whipping that foo into shape. He is better suited for a run n gun offense, not a structured championship lakers squad. Send him to Oakland, he doesn't belong in LA. Just not a good fit at all. Bad taste on this proposal. I wont even bother discussing Jeffries...
Re: Do the Lakers have any interest in Nate?
Posted: Wed Dec 9, 2009 12:07 am
by Anklebreaker702
DEEP3CL wrote:Phil X wrote:morrison and sasha, no pick. Final offer
Agree with this.......plus we owe Memphis a pick to close the Pau trade, and I'm sure we don't wanna give up future picks.
Yeah I would do this as well. I like nate's game. I didn't realize we still owe Memphis a pick DEEP so that's just even better gravy.
Re: Do the Lakers have any interest in Nate?
Posted: Wed Dec 9, 2009 12:35 am
by TonyMontana
Phil X wrote:morrison and sasha, no pick. Final offer
We holding on to Sasha for a good trade......... CHECK SIG MANG..........
Re: Do the Lakers have any interest in Nate?
Posted: Wed Dec 9, 2009 1:36 am
by Tommy Trojan
Phil X wrote:morrison and sasha, no pick. Final offer
I would also throw in farmar too.
Re: Do the Lakers have any interest in Nate?
Posted: Wed Dec 9, 2009 3:47 am
by Sasha Vujacic
TonyMontana wrote:Phil X wrote:morrison and sasha, no pick. Final offer
We holding on to Sasha for a good trade......... CHECK SIG MANG..........
Finally a trade with fair value for me.
Re: Do the Lakers have any interest in Nate?
Posted: Wed Dec 9, 2009 3:54 am
by Slava
Knicks rather let Nate expire than take on additional garbage for 2010.
Re: Do the Lakers have any interest in Nate?
Posted: Wed Dec 9, 2009 5:32 am
by Tommy Trojan
j-far wrote:Knicks rather let Nate expire than take on additional garbage for 2010.
Let's just unload all the garabage we have to the Knicks
Re: Do the Lakers have any interest in Nate?
Posted: Wed Dec 9, 2009 6:51 am
by laduane1
Nate is a great player. Lakers would have to give up something nice to get him. Nate asked for 10 million on a one year deal before the season began. So we can think of him, but at this stage of the Lakers, he is not really an option. I rather have Shannon Brown develop and he cost a ton less.
Re: Do the Lakers have any interest in Nate?
Posted: Wed Dec 9, 2009 7:15 am
by Dr Aki
sure lakers are interested in nate, knicks interested in farmar, ammo or sasha?
Re: Do the Lakers have any interest in Nate?
Posted: Thu Dec 10, 2009 7:44 am
by Marty McFly
Aki wrote:sure lakers are interested in nate, knicks interested in farmar, ammo or sasha?
nate was born to be a laker.he's got showtime running through his veins.he does some dumb ****, but that's because there is no one on the team other than the coach like a kobe to let him know to stop the non sense.
i would trade nate and jeffires for farmar and no ammo.i think jeffires is the sorta glue guy constant championship contenders can afford to pay 6 mill a year for a year and a half specifically for certain match ups like the celtics's rondo.
Re: Do the Lakers have any interest in Nate?
Posted: Fri Dec 11, 2009 11:20 pm
by SApuro_
Nate is a shooter. The lakers need a distributor and floor general. I dont think this is a good fit.
Re: Do the Lakers have any interest in Nate?
Posted: Sat Dec 12, 2009 12:01 am
by DEEP3CL
SApuro_ wrote:Nate is a shooter. The lakers need a distributor and floor general. I dont think this is a good fit.
Shooter is being way too nice........Nate is a gunner, big difference to me. But I agree with you.