Page 1 of 1

Do you agree or disagree with this article

Posted: Mon Feb 8, 2010 8:31 pm
by magic1fan
http://20secondtimeout.blogspot.com/


you have to scroll down a few paragrahs to where he talks about the lakers and cavs supporting cast. I've always said the cavs supporting cast is underrated,while our is a bit overrated.

Re: Do you agree or disagree with this article

Posted: Tue Feb 9, 2010 8:12 pm
by Biff
How many teams go 10 deep in the playoffs? That might help the Cavs during the regular season, but the Lakers starting 5 is vastly superior to the Cavs starting 5 and during the playoffs that will become evident. I don't think the Cavs can beat the Lakers in a 7 game series in the playoffs unless they get another piece. Hickson is developing nicely, but he's young and inexperienced; they need a big that can consistently knock down a midrange jumper and open up the lane for Lebron.

Re: Do you agree or disagree with this article

Posted: Tue Feb 9, 2010 8:23 pm
by Sedale Threatt
Cleveland is very solid, but lacks another clear-cut star. L.A. is the exact opposite in that we're top-heavy but really drop off after the Artest and Odom.

I was singing the underrated praise last year -- in fact, I thought they were the Chicago Bulls without Scottie Pippen -- until the Cavs flamed out against the playoffs. As such, I think there's a reason they don't get the attention they might.

They're a very, very good team, with a great shot at winning a championship, but they won't be truly great until they get LeBron a wing man.

Re: Do you agree or disagree with this article

Posted: Wed Feb 10, 2010 2:31 am
by Biff
Sedale Threatt wrote:Cleveland is very solid, but lacks another clear-cut star. L.A. is the exact opposite in that we're top-heavy but really drop off after the Artest and Odom.

I was singing the underrated praise last year -- in fact, I thought they were the Chicago Bulls without Scottie Pippen -- until the Cavs flamed out against the playoffs. As such, I think there's a reason they don't get the attention they might.

They're a very, very good team, with a great shot at winning a championship, but they won't be truly great until they get LeBron a wing man.


I'm not sure if he needs a Scottie Pippen (I know you don't mean Scottie Pippen per se, I'm just not sure if he even needs a player close to that caliber) to win it all, but he definitely needs another piece. With Boston as beat up as they are and with Orlando not having the same chemistry as last year, they've gotta be the favorites in the east, but the Lakers are just too stacked to overcome. If Kobe isn't healthy, then things change, but I think Kobe will be fine by the time the playoffs start.

The Cavs have a solid team. Their issue last year was that nobody but Lebron was stepping up. I think Shaq is experienced enough to not choke come playoff time and will give Lebron a guy he can count on. We'll see if Mo Williams reverts back to being a choker once the heat is turned up. If Lebron can just get a guy who will make shots when he is supposed to, I think the Cavs can beat the Lakers, I'm just not sure if they have that guy right now.

Re: Do you agree or disagree with this article

Posted: Thu Feb 11, 2010 12:12 am
by Mamba Venom
Biff wrote:How many teams go 10 deep in the playoffs? That might help the Cavs during the regular season, but the Lakers starting 5 is vastly superior to the Cavs starting 5 and during the playoffs that will become evident. I don't think the Cavs can beat the Lakers in a 7 game series in the playoffs unless they get another piece. Hickson is developing nicely, but he's young and inexperienced; they need a big that can consistently knock down a midrange jumper and open up the lane for Lebron.


The Lakers went 10 deep last year.

Just about everyone played.

Expect to see LO, Luke, Brown, Farmar and another Laker off of the bench in the play-offs (if all are still Lakers)