Slim Charless wrote:JKiddy wrote:In an alternate universe that might be closer than the majority of Nets fans believe, the possibility of a Cam Johnson trade likely only occurs if A) Ownership + Management decide it is time to break this whole thing up (or the majority of it) AND B) Bridges gives his blessing if they end up keeping him (or even out of respect if they aren't shortly before or thereafter). They operate as a very family friendly organization who do not burn bridges unless it is 100% warranted due to the failure of the other party.
If all of that came into play within a few hours I believe the Nets would ask for more than just a player who is about to end his career who is a former Net (although expiring shortly) and a 2nd round pick. I know we said a protected 1st. It might come down to what the protections were. If it were Top 2 or Top 3 then maybe the Nets consider it IF THEY GOT ALL THEIR PICKS BACK FROM HOUSTON. But, if it were much worse than that then I do not think they would do that with a full lottery protection.
Think about it. If the Nets cannot count on their own tank after blowing the team up (trading Bridges, Johnson, and or Claxton/Thomas) which likely sets them back another 4 years, then they would need more assets for their current assets (Cam Johnson being on of them who is on a fairly friendly contract).
Where do you get this value? CamJo has preformed worse for you then he ever did with us lol. Somehow you think this increases his value......
Also, if the Nets players were sooooo good and valuable, why are the Nets so bad?
Caveat: not agreeing with his valuations.
Brooklyn has a glut of 2-way wings, no power forwards and no PG.
It just so happens that rotation caliber 2-way wings are highly valued in this league.
But wings by themselves aren’t enough to be a good team.