Utah-Chi-NY-OKC

[cjmcallist]

I don't attribute much value to Dieng, maybe he is an NBA player, maybe not - replace him with a pick, I'm sure OKC still values him. Giddey is fine, but would rather have a pick. Our pick is marginal value if trading Lauri, but still nice to have returned, but it needs another asset considering the minimal chance of conveying.

I'd say... 2 really good picks, 1 meh pick, and our pick returned? Maybe 12, highest of the picks OKC has in 2026, our pick returned, lowest of their picks in 2028?

I'd do that, but in 2026 we only have MIA if it falls in the 2025 lottery. Just to make sure I got it right...

#12
2025 UTA FRP
2026 OKC/MIA FRP (best of)
2028 OKC/DAL FRP (worst of)
for
Markkanen

I'm so thirsty for Markkanen that I'd probably put in the 2025 PHI FRP if needed (assuming he's willing to immediately extend with us).

[babyjax13]

I don't attribute much value to Dieng, maybe he is an NBA player, maybe not - replace him with a pick, I'm sure OKC still values him. Giddey is fine, but would rather have a pick. Our pick is marginal value if trading Lauri, but still nice to have returned, but it needs another asset considering the minimal chance of conveying.

I'd say... 2 really good picks, 1 meh pick, and our pick returned? Maybe 12, highest of the picks OKC has in 2026, our pick returned, lowest of their picks in 2028?

I'd do that, but in 2026 we only have MIA if it falls in the 2025 lottery. Just to make sure I got it right...

#12
2025 UTA FRP
2026 OKC/MIA FRP (best of)
2028 OKC/DAL FRP (worst of)
for
Markkanen

I'm so thirsty for Markkanen that I'd probably put in the 2025 PHI FRP if needed (assuming he's willing to immediately extend with us).

Something to this effect. The 'best of' may need to be a year in which OKC has a few more high upside picks, but this general idea. I'd still love to keep Lauri, but I think we need to bottom put.