SAS - Utah

Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger

Godaddycurse
RealGM
Posts: 21,994
And1: 13,911
Joined: Nov 13, 2019
 

SAS - Utah 

Post#1 » by Godaddycurse » Thu Jun 6, 2024 12:29 am

Utah trade: Collins
SAS trade Johnson, Graham

Why for Utah: let kessler start again and see if Keldon can bounce back
Why for SAS: add a stop gap pf to start next to Wemby and get out of keldons last year
One_and_Done
General Manager
Posts: 9,162
And1: 5,577
Joined: Jun 03, 2023

Re: SAS - Utah 

Post#2 » by One_and_Done » Thu Jun 6, 2024 12:34 am

Spurs probably have zero interest in Collins.
Warspite wrote:Billups was a horrible scorer who could only score with an open corner 3 or a FT.
Chinook
Head Coach
Posts: 6,646
And1: 3,784
Joined: Jan 12, 2015
       

Re: SAS - Utah 

Post#3 » by Chinook » Thu Jun 6, 2024 12:56 am

What? No. the Spurs certainly don't want to get out of Johnson's contract. The RGM conversation about him is skewing the reality that he's making $18 Million a year for three years in a league where the MLE is $13.5 Million over that same time. Fans on this board may not want him, but he's making less than the average sixth man is.
wemby
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,901
And1: 1,238
Joined: Jun 13, 2023
 

Re: SAS - Utah 

Post#4 » by wemby » Thu Jun 6, 2024 2:38 am

I like it about as much as a kick in the groin. And no, I'm not a masochist.
User avatar
SkyHook
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,108
And1: 3,437
Joined: Jun 24, 2002
 

Re: SAS - Utah 

Post#5 » by SkyHook » Thu Jun 6, 2024 3:21 am

This is probably one where both teams pass.
"When the mob and the press and the whole world tell you to move, your job is to plant yourself like a tree beside the river of truth, and tell the whole world...

... NO, YOU MOVE."
User avatar
babyjax13
RealGM
Posts: 35,078
And1: 17,600
Joined: Jul 02, 2006
Location: Fresno, eating Birria
     

Re: SAS - Utah 

Post#6 » by babyjax13 » Thu Jun 6, 2024 3:50 am

Pretty terrible for San Antonio. Worse contract, older - maybe slightly better - player. Utah takes this and runs, but I wouldn't want to add the incentive to actually balance the deal.
Image

JazzMatt13 wrote:just because I think aliens probably have to do with JFK, doesn't mean my theory that Jazz will never get Wiggins, isn't true.

JColl
User avatar
SkyHook
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,108
And1: 3,437
Joined: Jun 24, 2002
 

Re: SAS - Utah 

Post#7 » by SkyHook » Thu Jun 6, 2024 4:09 am

babyjax13 wrote:Pretty terrible for San Antonio. Worse contract, older - maybe slightly better - player. Utah takes this and runs, but I wouldn't want to add the incentive to actually balance the deal.


Collins is clearly the better player in my eyes. The only metric, traditional or advanced, where Johnson has a distinct edge is in assist rate.

And, as overpriced a contract as Collins has, it ends a year sooner. (Johnson is borderline underperforming his.) Unless the Jazz are truly going "big game hunting" this summer — and I'll believe that when I see it — they're probably better off keeping him rather than paying a worse player for more years.
"When the mob and the press and the whole world tell you to move, your job is to plant yourself like a tree beside the river of truth, and tell the whole world...

... NO, YOU MOVE."
User avatar
babyjax13
RealGM
Posts: 35,078
And1: 17,600
Joined: Jul 02, 2006
Location: Fresno, eating Birria
     

Re: SAS - Utah 

Post#8 » by babyjax13 » Thu Jun 6, 2024 4:13 am

SkyHook wrote:
babyjax13 wrote:Pretty terrible for San Antonio. Worse contract, older - maybe slightly better - player. Utah takes this and runs, but I wouldn't want to add the incentive to actually balance the deal.


Collins is clearly the better player in my eyes. The only metric, traditional or advanced, where Johnson has a distinct edge is in assist rate.

And, as overpriced a contract as Collins has, it ends a year sooner. (Johnson is borderline underperforming his.) Unless the Jazz are truly going "big game hunting" this summer — and I'll believe that when I see it — they're probably better off keeping him rather than paying a worse player for more years.


We'd be paying him $10 million less a year on a declining contract. He's a more valuable archetype, he's a way higher volume shooter, he would be a great 6th man. Neither is great, both occupy a similar spot of 'ideally this guy is your worst starter or best bench player' so I'd rather pay Johnson pretty easily.
Image

JazzMatt13 wrote:just because I think aliens probably have to do with JFK, doesn't mean my theory that Jazz will never get Wiggins, isn't true.

JColl
User avatar
SkyHook
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,108
And1: 3,437
Joined: Jun 24, 2002
 

Re: SAS - Utah 

Post#9 » by SkyHook » Thu Jun 6, 2024 4:33 am

babyjax13 wrote:
SkyHook wrote:
babyjax13 wrote:Pretty terrible for San Antonio. Worse contract, older - maybe slightly better - player. Utah takes this and runs, but I wouldn't want to add the incentive to actually balance the deal.


Collins is clearly the better player in my eyes. The only metric, traditional or advanced, where Johnson has a distinct edge is in assist rate.

And, as overpriced a contract as Collins has, it ends a year sooner. (Johnson is borderline underperforming his.) Unless the Jazz are truly going "big game hunting" this summer — and I'll believe that when I see it — they're probably better off keeping him rather than paying a worse player for more years.


We'd be paying him $10 million less a year on a declining contract. He's a more valuable archetype, he's a way higher volume shooter, he would be a great 6th man. Neither is great, both occupy a similar spot of 'ideally this guy is your worst starter or best bench player' so I'd rather pay Johnson pretty easily.


We have a healthy disagreement.
"When the mob and the press and the whole world tell you to move, your job is to plant yourself like a tree beside the river of truth, and tell the whole world...

... NO, YOU MOVE."
User avatar
Bornstellar
General Manager
Posts: 9,544
And1: 22,777
Joined: Mar 05, 2018
 

Re: SAS - Utah 

Post#10 » by Bornstellar » Thu Jun 6, 2024 1:52 pm

I'd rather just keep Keldon. Spurs aren't looking to just dump him, especially not for Collins. If SA wanted Collins they would have made an offer when he was a FA or when he was being traded for peanuts
User avatar
Texas Chuck
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 92,418
And1: 98,330
Joined: May 19, 2012
Location: Purgatory
   

Re: SAS - Utah 

Post#11 » by Texas Chuck » Thu Jun 6, 2024 2:27 pm

I actually don't hate this. I like it more for the Spurs than the Jazz though. As little as I like Collins, he's as good or better than Keldon. And you get to flexibility sooner. Have the better player and extra roster spot for this year. Trade Collins as an expiring next summer when your roster is more ready to be competitive.

Utah just continues the tank and gives Johnson 20 shots a night to convince a bad team to take his contract for free the next summer. Forces their coach to play Kessler more and see if he's the guy many fans still think is worth a top 10 pick or if he's really just that starts games plays 20-25 minutes gives way to the closer guy and they still need a long-term answer at center.

Smart deal. It's just these are hated players so we default to the guy we already have because we can always see our guys positives and the other guys negatives way easier -- when ironically it should absolutely be the opposite.
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
louc1970
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,500
And1: 477
Joined: Feb 16, 2016

Re: SAS - Utah 

Post#12 » by louc1970 » Thu Jun 6, 2024 2:48 pm

Chinook wrote:What? No. the Spurs certainly don't want to get out of Johnson's contract. The RGM conversation about him is skewing the reality that he's making $18 Million a year for three years in a league where the MLE is $13.5 Million over that same time. Fans on this board may not want him, but he's making less than the average sixth man is.

Valid point. But is producing as well as the average 6th man?

The likes about Collins is he rebounds better, can play the center is a small ball lineup or next to Wemby, and he shoot 37% from 3 this year. The cost is $6.5m more a year but that is recouped by sending off Graham.

Perhaps a different option would be Sexton instead of Collins.
Chinook
Head Coach
Posts: 6,646
And1: 3,784
Joined: Jan 12, 2015
       

Re: SAS - Utah 

Post#13 » by Chinook » Thu Jun 6, 2024 5:18 pm

louc1970 wrote:
Chinook wrote:What? No. the Spurs certainly don't want to get out of Johnson's contract. The RGM conversation about him is skewing the reality that he's making $18 Million a year for three years in a league where the MLE is $13.5 Million over that same time. Fans on this board may not want him, but he's making less than the average sixth man is.

Valid point. But is producing as well as the average 6th man?

The likes about Collins is he rebounds better, can play the center is a small ball lineup or next to Wemby, and he shoot 37% from 3 this year. The cost is $6.5m more a year but that is recouped by sending off Graham.

Perhaps a different option would be Sexton instead of Collins.


Yes, Johnson is producing fine as a sixth man.

Return to Trades and Transactions