Rumoured to have been discussed at the deadline.
I think it makes so much sense for both sides:
Wiggins for portis
… im guessing connaughton’s salary would be needed to make it work!
Rumored bucks - warriors trade revisited
Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger
Rumored bucks - warriors trade revisited
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,075
- And1: 2,091
- Joined: Sep 03, 2011
Re: Rumored bucks - warriors trade revisited
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 34,243
- And1: 21,854
- Joined: Feb 13, 2013
Re: Rumored bucks - warriors trade revisited
This doesn't work financially.
Milwaukee can't really aggregate multiple players to take Wiggins either.
Milwaukee can't really aggregate multiple players to take Wiggins either.
Re: Rumored bucks - warriors trade revisited
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 34,605
- And1: 6,246
- Joined: Apr 27, 2005
-
Re: Rumored bucks - warriors trade revisited
Yeah the apron rules basically make this DOA.
Portis/Connaughton make $22M, Wiggins makes $26M. So Milwaukee needs to add another $4M at a minimum so they don't get hard capped at the first apron, which they're already well over.
Then if they can figure that out, they're still hard capped at the second apron because they aggregated salaries to match Wiggins. Which means their roster is effectively Giannis/Dame/Middleton/Wiggins/BroLo and 9 minimum salary guys. Not a recipe for success when basically all of their key players have missed some time over the past couple years.
Portis/Connaughton make $22M, Wiggins makes $26M. So Milwaukee needs to add another $4M at a minimum so they don't get hard capped at the first apron, which they're already well over.
Then if they can figure that out, they're still hard capped at the second apron because they aggregated salaries to match Wiggins. Which means their roster is effectively Giannis/Dame/Middleton/Wiggins/BroLo and 9 minimum salary guys. Not a recipe for success when basically all of their key players have missed some time over the past couple years.
Re: Rumored bucks - warriors trade revisited
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 17,429
- And1: 7,167
- Joined: Mar 30, 2006
- Location: Whereever you go - there you are
Re: Rumored bucks - warriors trade revisited
I think it would have worked at the trade deadline as some of these cap rules weren't in play yet. But it's no longer an option.
Return to Trades and Transactions