Ingram to Grizzlies (with Philly and Spurs)
Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger
Ingram to Grizzlies (with Philly and Spurs)
-
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,464
- And1: 600
- Joined: Jun 23, 2018
Ingram to Grizzlies (with Philly and Spurs)
Sixers out: Paul Reed, #16, ‘26 1st(higher of 2), ‘29 pick swap(higher of Phil/LAC), ‘27 2nd
Sixers in: Keldon Johnson and Santi Aldama
Sixers get 2 good young role players than fit well between Maxey and Embiid
Grizzlies out: Marcus Smart, Santi Aldama, and Luke Kennard
Grizzlies in: Brandon Ingram
Grizzlies all of a sudden have 1 of the better starting 5 in the league with Ja/Bane/Ingram/GG Jackson/J Jackson
Spurs out: #8 and Keldon Johnson
Spurs in: Marcus Smart, Paul Reed, #16
Spurs get a tough vet guard to lead their young up and coming team, trading back 8 spots isn’t a huge loss in this draft.
Pelicans out: Brandon Ingram
Pelicans in: Luke Kennard, #8, ‘26 1st via Phil, ‘29 pick swap via Phil, and ‘27 2nd via Phil
Getting a top 10 pick + another 1st and pick swap will be a tough offer for any team to beat that is interested in Ingram.
Sixers in: Keldon Johnson and Santi Aldama
Sixers get 2 good young role players than fit well between Maxey and Embiid
Grizzlies out: Marcus Smart, Santi Aldama, and Luke Kennard
Grizzlies in: Brandon Ingram
Grizzlies all of a sudden have 1 of the better starting 5 in the league with Ja/Bane/Ingram/GG Jackson/J Jackson
Spurs out: #8 and Keldon Johnson
Spurs in: Marcus Smart, Paul Reed, #16
Spurs get a tough vet guard to lead their young up and coming team, trading back 8 spots isn’t a huge loss in this draft.
Pelicans out: Brandon Ingram
Pelicans in: Luke Kennard, #8, ‘26 1st via Phil, ‘29 pick swap via Phil, and ‘27 2nd via Phil
Getting a top 10 pick + another 1st and pick swap will be a tough offer for any team to beat that is interested in Ingram.
Re: Ingram to Grizzlies (with Philly and Spurs)
- Texas Chuck
- Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
- Posts: 92,417
- And1: 98,300
- Joined: May 19, 2012
- Location: Purgatory
-
Re: Ingram to Grizzlies (with Philly and Spurs)
I can't really believe you think Philly should use up cap space and this many assets to add Keldon/Santi. Just feels like absolutely terrible value here. I can't even move past them to the rest of this because so much value is being stolen from them to make it work for the other teams.
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
Re: Ingram to Grizzlies (with Philly and Spurs)
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 21,980
- And1: 13,904
- Joined: Nov 13, 2019
-
Re: Ingram to Grizzlies (with Philly and Spurs)
Just cut out grizzlies and spurs
Re: Ingram to Grizzlies (with Philly and Spurs)
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,835
- And1: 5,900
- Joined: Feb 12, 2016
-
Re: Ingram to Grizzlies (with Philly and Spurs)
Godaddycurse wrote:Just cut out grizzlies and spurs
Yep, Memphis doesn't need another max contract offensive guy. But maybe a 3rd team that wants Ingram could be worked in here and figure out value.
Keldon is likely worth just taking his contract outside of SA he is value is neutral at best. Santi worth a very late 1st or 2nds only.
Re: Ingram to Grizzlies (with Philly and Spurs)
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,226
- And1: 640
- Joined: Jun 02, 2022
-
Re: Ingram to Grizzlies (with Philly and Spurs)
psman2 wrote:. Santi worth a very late 1st or 2nds only.

Re: Ingram to Grizzlies (with Philly and Spurs)
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,367
- And1: 8,424
- Joined: Jan 21, 2017
-
Re: Ingram to Grizzlies (with Philly and Spurs)
Morey would jump off a cliff if this is what he gets after circling this summer on his calendar.
Re: Ingram to Grizzlies (with Philly and Spurs)
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,835
- And1: 5,900
- Joined: Feb 12, 2016
-
Re: Ingram to Grizzlies (with Philly and Spurs)
esvl wrote:psman2 wrote:. Santi worth a very late 1st or 2nds only.
Objectively that is what he is worth on the open market. I don't think we are looking to trade him, but that is the range he would fetch.
Re: Ingram to Grizzlies (with Philly and Spurs)
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,226
- And1: 640
- Joined: Jun 02, 2022
-
Re: Ingram to Grizzlies (with Philly and Spurs)
psman2 wrote:esvl wrote:psman2 wrote:. Santi worth a very late 1st or 2nds only.
Objectively that is what he is worth on the open market. I don't think we are looking to trade him, but that is the range he would fetch.
I think you are referring to the Realgm market as “the open market”. The other teams’ FOs might have have followed Aldama closer than Chuck & Co.
Re: Ingram to Grizzlies (with Philly and Spurs)
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,901
- And1: 1,238
- Joined: Jun 13, 2023
-
Re: Ingram to Grizzlies (with Philly and Spurs)
If Spurs are looking for a Marcus Smart type guard, might as well take Devin Carter with pick 8, probably a better bet going forward.
Re: Ingram to Grizzlies (with Philly and Spurs)
- Texas Chuck
- Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
- Posts: 92,417
- And1: 98,300
- Joined: May 19, 2012
- Location: Purgatory
-
Re: Ingram to Grizzlies (with Philly and Spurs)
esvl wrote:psman2 wrote:esvl wrote:
Objectively that is what he is worth on the open market. I don't think we are looking to trade him, but that is the range he would fetch.
I think you are referring to the Realgm market as “the open market”. The other teams’ FOs might have have followed Aldama closer than Chuck & Co.
They certainly have followed him closer than we have. Not sure that means they are going to pay a premium for one year of a rotation level player.
But do tell Chuck & Co why he is worth a premium asset.
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
Re: Ingram to Grizzlies (with Philly and Spurs)
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,226
- And1: 640
- Joined: Jun 02, 2022
-
Re: Ingram to Grizzlies (with Philly and Spurs)
Texas Chuck wrote:esvl wrote:psman2 wrote:
Objectively that is what he is worth on the open market. I don't think we are looking to trade him, but that is the range he would fetch.
I think you are referring to the Realgm market as “the open market”. The other teams’ FOs might have have followed Aldama closer than Chuck & Co.
They certainly have followed him closer than we have. Not sure that means they are going to pay a premium for one year of a rotation level player.
But do tell Chuck & Co why he is worth a premium asset.
In short, the trajectory of his career reminds of the one of Lauri. Do you remember his market value fluctuations? Aldama needs 1-2 years of further physical and mental maturity to fully build his profile as an NBA player. He may become Lauri Light or Olynik, or fails to my embarrassment I will be willing to accept. We will see soon. But potential is there.
Re: Ingram to Grizzlies (with Philly and Spurs)
-
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,464
- And1: 600
- Joined: Jun 23, 2018
Re: Ingram to Grizzlies (with Philly and Spurs)
Texas Chuck wrote:I can't really believe you think Philly should use up cap space and this many assets to add Keldon/Santi. Just feels like absolutely terrible value here. I can't even move past them to the rest of this because so much value is being stolen from them to make it work for the other teams.
Aldama for ‘26 1st (it’s Sixers or OKC so not likely to be a good) and ‘27 2nd
Keldon Johnson for 16 and ‘29 pick swap
Paul Reed is a nothing burger, his non-guaranteed contract isn’t likely to be picked up if not traded.
I don’t see where the bad value is honestly.
Plus the Sixers would still have nearly $30M and ‘28/‘30 1st’s to further improve the team. I see Johnson and Aldama as really good fits as role players with more untapped potential in better situations. Id much rather go that route than burn the franchise down for a 2 year window by signing/trading for the likes of PG or Butler
Re: Ingram to Grizzlies (with Philly and Spurs)
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,754
- And1: 640
- Joined: Jul 21, 2010
Re: Ingram to Grizzlies (with Philly and Spurs)
PhillyFan11 wrote:Texas Chuck wrote:I can't really believe you think Philly should use up cap space and this many assets to add Keldon/Santi. Just feels like absolutely terrible value here. I can't even move past them to the rest of this because so much value is being stolen from them to make it work for the other teams.
Aldama for ‘26 1st (it’s Sixers or OKC so not likely to be a good) and ‘27 2nd
Keldon Johnson for 16 and ‘29 pick swap
Paul Reed is a nothing burger, his non-guaranteed contract isn’t likely to be picked up if not traded.
I don’t see where the bad value is honestly.
Plus the Sixers would still have nearly $30M and ‘28/‘30 1st’s to further improve the team. I see Johnson and Aldama as really good fits as role players with more untapped potential in better situations. Id much rather go that route than burn the franchise down for a 2 year window by signing/trading for the likes of PG or Butler
The value sucks, but that really isn’t the point here.
The point is if all Morey gets out of max cap space and 2 FRP’s is Kelton Johnson and Aldama the fans would want him permanently fired!
Re: Ingram to Grizzlies (with Philly and Spurs)
-
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,464
- And1: 600
- Joined: Jun 23, 2018
Re: Ingram to Grizzlies (with Philly and Spurs)
PhillyNj wrote:PhillyFan11 wrote:Texas Chuck wrote:I can't really believe you think Philly should use up cap space and this many assets to add Keldon/Santi. Just feels like absolutely terrible value here. I can't even move past them to the rest of this because so much value is being stolen from them to make it work for the other teams.
Aldama for ‘26 1st (it’s Sixers or OKC so not likely to be a good) and ‘27 2nd
Keldon Johnson for 16 and ‘29 pick swap
Paul Reed is a nothing burger, his non-guaranteed contract isn’t likely to be picked up if not traded.
I don’t see where the bad value is honestly.
Plus the Sixers would still have nearly $30M and ‘28/‘30 1st’s to further improve the team. I see Johnson and Aldama as really good fits as role players with more untapped potential in better situations. Id much rather go that route than burn the franchise down for a 2 year window by signing/trading for the likes of PG or Butler
The value sucks, but that really isn’t the point here.
The point is if all Morey gets out of max cap space and 2 FRP’s is Kelton Johnson and Aldama the fans would want him permanently fired!
*1/2 of available cap space
Re: Ingram to Grizzlies (with Philly and Spurs)
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,754
- And1: 640
- Joined: Jul 21, 2010
Re: Ingram to Grizzlies (with Philly and Spurs)
PhillyFan11 wrote:PhillyNj wrote:PhillyFan11 wrote:
Aldama for ‘26 1st (it’s Sixers or OKC so not likely to be a good) and ‘27 2nd
Keldon Johnson for 16 and ‘29 pick swap
Paul Reed is a nothing burger, his non-guaranteed contract isn’t likely to be picked up if not traded.
I don’t see where the bad value is honestly.
Plus the Sixers would still have nearly $30M and ‘28/‘30 1st’s to further improve the team. I see Johnson and Aldama as really good fits as role players with more untapped potential in better situations. Id much rather go that route than burn the franchise down for a 2 year window by signing/trading for the likes of PG or Butler
The value sucks, but that really isn’t the point here.
The point is if all Morey gets out of max cap space and 2 FRP’s is Kelton Johnson and Aldama the fans would want him permanently fired!
*1/2 of available cap space
10% of the value for 50% of assets. The big signing comes before you even consider a trade like this.
Re: Ingram to Grizzlies (with Philly and Spurs)
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,109
- And1: 23,526
- Joined: Jun 26, 2006
-
Re: Ingram to Grizzlies (with Philly and Spurs)
Skybox wrote:Morey would jump off a cliff if this is what he gets after circling this summer on his calendar.
He wouldn't have to jump. He'd be thrown off.
Re: Ingram to Grizzlies (with Philly and Spurs)
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 29,121
- And1: 10,319
- Joined: May 01, 2010
Re: Ingram to Grizzlies (with Philly and Spurs)
What if it was just 16 and 41 to Memphis for Aldama, Ziaire, and 39?
Re: Ingram to Grizzlies (with Philly and Spurs)
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 7,457
- And1: 3,842
- Joined: Mar 19, 2018
Re: Ingram to Grizzlies (with Philly and Spurs)
I think the trade value is fair & I like Carter at 8 in this draft but there's no real proven value coming back for NO's 2nd best player. This is a volume trade & not ultimately what NO's want. Nothing in this trade is guaranteed to plug any holes & truthfully neither is my attempt at Sarr but that Unicorn fit with Zion is a tough find & that's a risk I'd live with as a result.
Daniels who's 20 is as good an option to start/develop as Carter for NO's. He's already proven to be elite defensively with signs of offensive progression losing development minutes to CJ's max.
As I also mentioned. I don't normally like drafting big men high in the draft, especially if it's based in potential but Zion is a tough build & there's been a revolving door at C I want to stop. My goal for NO's in this offseason/draft, is Sarr. Green wants to switch defend & the 19yo best skill is being 7' switch able, with indicators suggesting he should be able to be a floor spacer in time which is what Zion needs offensively, not a big that doesn't attempt 3's. If Sarr doesn't develop before the Zion experiment comes to an end, He will hopefully be a young 2 way C NO's can pivot to building with.
For Green & a team that wants to switch defend, (Sarr 1-5), (Herb 1-4) 1st team defense, (Daniels 1-4) who's only 20 & ranked #2 in d=Lebron, has elite defensive potential. Both Sarr 19 & Daniels 20 are low volume 30% shooters currently but have shown potential/indication they could be adequate spacers. Murphy who has good chemistry with ZIon, the deep spacing threat.
My offseason goal & projected "future" roster
(#1 Sarr 19 via BI pick trade) , (Vet either free agency or CJ trade to bridge development)
Zion 24 -
Murphy 23 -
Herb 25 - Hawkins 22
Daniels 20, (Vet PG either free agency or trade to bridge development)
Ideally, also some cap savings in the soft reset.
Daniels who's 20 is as good an option to start/develop as Carter for NO's. He's already proven to be elite defensively with signs of offensive progression losing development minutes to CJ's max.
As I also mentioned. I don't normally like drafting big men high in the draft, especially if it's based in potential but Zion is a tough build & there's been a revolving door at C I want to stop. My goal for NO's in this offseason/draft, is Sarr. Green wants to switch defend & the 19yo best skill is being 7' switch able, with indicators suggesting he should be able to be a floor spacer in time which is what Zion needs offensively, not a big that doesn't attempt 3's. If Sarr doesn't develop before the Zion experiment comes to an end, He will hopefully be a young 2 way C NO's can pivot to building with.
For Green & a team that wants to switch defend, (Sarr 1-5), (Herb 1-4) 1st team defense, (Daniels 1-4) who's only 20 & ranked #2 in d=Lebron, has elite defensive potential. Both Sarr 19 & Daniels 20 are low volume 30% shooters currently but have shown potential/indication they could be adequate spacers. Murphy who has good chemistry with ZIon, the deep spacing threat.
My offseason goal & projected "future" roster
(#1 Sarr 19 via BI pick trade) , (Vet either free agency or CJ trade to bridge development)
Zion 24 -
Murphy 23 -
Herb 25 - Hawkins 22
Daniels 20, (Vet PG either free agency or trade to bridge development)
Ideally, also some cap savings in the soft reset.
Re: Ingram to Grizzlies (with Philly and Spurs)
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 58,841
- And1: 35,922
- Joined: Dec 22, 2010
-
Re: Ingram to Grizzlies (with Philly and Spurs)
It's important to keep in mind that Philly doesn't really have two full max slots. They're using Maxey's cap hold to manufacture them. In addition to Maxey's rookie max, they've got players like Batum who I assume they want back.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Return to Trades and Transactions