Sac/Utah

Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger

SNPA
General Manager
Posts: 9,074
And1: 8,400
Joined: Apr 15, 2020

Sac/Utah 

Post#1 » by SNPA » Wed Jun 19, 2024 5:25 pm

13/Sasha/Duarte for Clarkson/29/32

Danny moves up to get a second lotto pick, and only takes back expiring salary.

If Sac thinks Monk is gone they have to fill that role and Clarkson does so. They also get two picks where some long athletic forwards will be available (Bridges/Freeman/Pacome/etc).
User avatar
Texas Chuck
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 92,417
And1: 98,298
Joined: May 19, 2012
Location: Purgatory
   

Re: Sac/Utah 

Post#2 » by Texas Chuck » Wed Jun 19, 2024 5:28 pm

Clarkson should come considerably cheaper than this.
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
SNPA
General Manager
Posts: 9,074
And1: 8,400
Joined: Apr 15, 2020

Re: Sac/Utah 

Post#3 » by SNPA » Wed Jun 19, 2024 5:31 pm

Texas Chuck wrote:Clarkson should come considerably cheaper than this.

Was thinking it’s light for Sac. Not sure how to span the gap. They won’t add a 2025 first or Hendricks.
LightTheBeam
RealGM
Posts: 18,925
And1: 12,058
Joined: Sep 17, 2010
     

Re: Sac/Utah 

Post#4 » by LightTheBeam » Wed Jun 19, 2024 6:18 pm

I think Duarte + Sasha + Portland 2nd + another Kings 2nd gets it done for Clarkson

If they want Davion in place of Duarte or Sasha OR Huerter instead of both then so be it.
User avatar
Texas Chuck
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 92,417
And1: 98,298
Joined: May 19, 2012
Location: Purgatory
   

Re: Sac/Utah 

Post#5 » by Texas Chuck » Wed Jun 19, 2024 6:25 pm

SNPA wrote:
Texas Chuck wrote:Clarkson should come considerably cheaper than this.

Was thinking it’s light for Sac. Not sure how to span the gap. They won’t add a 2025 first or Hendricks.


I'd start by sending them smaller incentive than 13. I tend to agree that a couple 2nds and expiring contracts should be plenty.
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
User avatar
babyjax13
RealGM
Posts: 35,069
And1: 17,589
Joined: Jul 02, 2006
Location: Fresno, eating Birria
     

Re: Sac/Utah 

Post#6 » by babyjax13 » Wed Jun 19, 2024 6:34 pm

Texas Chuck wrote:
SNPA wrote:
Texas Chuck wrote:Clarkson should come considerably cheaper than this.

Was thinking it’s light for Sac. Not sure how to span the gap. They won’t add a 2025 first or Hendricks.


I'd start by sending them smaller incentive than 13. I tend to agree that a couple 2nds and expiring contracts should be plenty.

Agreed.
Image

JazzMatt13 wrote:just because I think aliens probably have to do with JFK, doesn't mean my theory that Jazz will never get Wiggins, isn't true.

JColl
User avatar
eminence
RealGM
Posts: 16,941
And1: 11,769
Joined: Mar 07, 2015

Re: Sac/Utah 

Post#7 » by eminence » Wed Jun 19, 2024 6:39 pm

Fine as is for me, but no real interest at lower prices (2nds). We have picks stacked to the ceiling already, consolidation is the goal.

29/32 are worth a later teens pick on their own.
I bought a boat.
SNPA
General Manager
Posts: 9,074
And1: 8,400
Joined: Apr 15, 2020

Re: Sac/Utah 

Post#8 » by SNPA » Wed Jun 19, 2024 7:40 pm

eminence wrote:Fine as is for me, but no real interest at lower prices (2nds). We have picks stacked to the ceiling already, consolidation is the goal.

29/32 are worth a later teens pick on their own.

I had it low 20’s. So the Kings are move back pick-value wise 7-12’ish spots. It’s not that far off.

If Sac can replace Monk with Clarkson and convert Duarte/Sasha into long forwards they are addressing serious needs. They’d have the MLE and BAE too to plug holes.
OxAndFox
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,551
And1: 3,100
Joined: May 17, 2022
Contact:

Re: Sac/Utah 

Post#9 » by OxAndFox » Wed Jun 19, 2024 8:14 pm

Absolutely not on the first deal. Clarkson is a scorer, but can't shoot. Not a good mix on this Kings team.
SNPA
General Manager
Posts: 9,074
And1: 8,400
Joined: Apr 15, 2020

Re: Sac/Utah 

Post#10 » by SNPA » Wed Jun 19, 2024 8:17 pm

OxAndFox wrote:Absolutely not on the first deal. Clarkson is a scorer, but can't shoot. Not a good mix on this Kings team.

Sexton? It could work with him too.
OxAndFox
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,551
And1: 3,100
Joined: May 17, 2022
Contact:

Re: Sac/Utah 

Post#11 » by OxAndFox » Wed Jun 19, 2024 8:22 pm

SNPA wrote:
OxAndFox wrote:Absolutely not on the first deal. Clarkson is a scorer, but can't shoot. Not a good mix on this Kings team.

Sexton? It could work with him too.


I like Sexton a lot more, but then it's tough seeing Utah do something like that. Sexton is a much better player than Clarkson and 7 years younger.
SNPA
General Manager
Posts: 9,074
And1: 8,400
Joined: Apr 15, 2020

Re: Sac/Utah 

Post#12 » by SNPA » Wed Jun 19, 2024 8:23 pm

OxAndFox wrote:
SNPA wrote:
OxAndFox wrote:Absolutely not on the first deal. Clarkson is a scorer, but can't shoot. Not a good mix on this Kings team.

Sexton? It could work with him too.


I like Sexton a lot more, but then it's tough seeing Utah do something like that. Sexton is a much better player than Clarkson and 7 years younger.

Would need to adjust.

Return to Trades and Transactions