13/Sasha/Duarte for Clarkson/29/32
Danny moves up to get a second lotto pick, and only takes back expiring salary.
If Sac thinks Monk is gone they have to fill that role and Clarkson does so. They also get two picks where some long athletic forwards will be available (Bridges/Freeman/Pacome/etc).
Sac/Utah
Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger
Re: Sac/Utah
- Texas Chuck
- Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
- Posts: 92,417
- And1: 98,298
- Joined: May 19, 2012
- Location: Purgatory
-
Re: Sac/Utah
Clarkson should come considerably cheaper than this.
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
Re: Sac/Utah
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,074
- And1: 8,400
- Joined: Apr 15, 2020
Re: Sac/Utah
Texas Chuck wrote:Clarkson should come considerably cheaper than this.
Was thinking it’s light for Sac. Not sure how to span the gap. They won’t add a 2025 first or Hendricks.
Re: Sac/Utah
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,925
- And1: 12,058
- Joined: Sep 17, 2010
-
Re: Sac/Utah
I think Duarte + Sasha + Portland 2nd + another Kings 2nd gets it done for Clarkson
If they want Davion in place of Duarte or Sasha OR Huerter instead of both then so be it.
If they want Davion in place of Duarte or Sasha OR Huerter instead of both then so be it.
Re: Sac/Utah
- Texas Chuck
- Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
- Posts: 92,417
- And1: 98,298
- Joined: May 19, 2012
- Location: Purgatory
-
Re: Sac/Utah
SNPA wrote:Texas Chuck wrote:Clarkson should come considerably cheaper than this.
Was thinking it’s light for Sac. Not sure how to span the gap. They won’t add a 2025 first or Hendricks.
I'd start by sending them smaller incentive than 13. I tend to agree that a couple 2nds and expiring contracts should be plenty.
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
Re: Sac/Utah
- babyjax13
- RealGM
- Posts: 35,069
- And1: 17,589
- Joined: Jul 02, 2006
- Location: Fresno, eating Birria
-
Re: Sac/Utah
Texas Chuck wrote:SNPA wrote:Texas Chuck wrote:Clarkson should come considerably cheaper than this.
Was thinking it’s light for Sac. Not sure how to span the gap. They won’t add a 2025 first or Hendricks.
I'd start by sending them smaller incentive than 13. I tend to agree that a couple 2nds and expiring contracts should be plenty.
Agreed.

JazzMatt13 wrote:just because I think aliens probably have to do with JFK, doesn't mean my theory that Jazz will never get Wiggins, isn't true.
JColl
Re: Sac/Utah
- eminence
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,941
- And1: 11,769
- Joined: Mar 07, 2015
Re: Sac/Utah
Fine as is for me, but no real interest at lower prices (2nds). We have picks stacked to the ceiling already, consolidation is the goal.
29/32 are worth a later teens pick on their own.
29/32 are worth a later teens pick on their own.
I bought a boat.
Re: Sac/Utah
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,074
- And1: 8,400
- Joined: Apr 15, 2020
Re: Sac/Utah
eminence wrote:Fine as is for me, but no real interest at lower prices (2nds). We have picks stacked to the ceiling already, consolidation is the goal.
29/32 are worth a later teens pick on their own.
I had it low 20’s. So the Kings are move back pick-value wise 7-12’ish spots. It’s not that far off.
If Sac can replace Monk with Clarkson and convert Duarte/Sasha into long forwards they are addressing serious needs. They’d have the MLE and BAE too to plug holes.
Re: Sac/Utah
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,551
- And1: 3,100
- Joined: May 17, 2022
- Contact:
Re: Sac/Utah
Absolutely not on the first deal. Clarkson is a scorer, but can't shoot. Not a good mix on this Kings team.
Re: Sac/Utah
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,074
- And1: 8,400
- Joined: Apr 15, 2020
Re: Sac/Utah
OxAndFox wrote:Absolutely not on the first deal. Clarkson is a scorer, but can't shoot. Not a good mix on this Kings team.
Sexton? It could work with him too.
Re: Sac/Utah
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,551
- And1: 3,100
- Joined: May 17, 2022
- Contact:
Re: Sac/Utah
SNPA wrote:OxAndFox wrote:Absolutely not on the first deal. Clarkson is a scorer, but can't shoot. Not a good mix on this Kings team.
Sexton? It could work with him too.
I like Sexton a lot more, but then it's tough seeing Utah do something like that. Sexton is a much better player than Clarkson and 7 years younger.
Re: Sac/Utah
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,074
- And1: 8,400
- Joined: Apr 15, 2020
Re: Sac/Utah
OxAndFox wrote:SNPA wrote:OxAndFox wrote:Absolutely not on the first deal. Clarkson is a scorer, but can't shoot. Not a good mix on this Kings team.
Sexton? It could work with him too.
I like Sexton a lot more, but then it's tough seeing Utah do something like that. Sexton is a much better player than Clarkson and 7 years younger.
Would need to adjust.
Return to Trades and Transactions