Washington/OKC/Sacramento

Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger

louc1970
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,499
And1: 477
Joined: Feb 16, 2016

Washington/OKC/Sacramento 

Post#1 » by louc1970 » Thu Jun 20, 2024 5:25 pm

Washington needs help everywhere (except Coulibaly/Avdija). Getting #2 is good but with this draft is it really a player who make the difference? I guess if they get Risacher, maybe, but he duplicates Coulibaly/Avdija.

Washington trades Kuzma/Bagley/#2
Washington Giddey/Wallace/Barnes/#12/#13/25 FRP.

OKC trades Giddey/Wallace/#12/25 FRP
OKC receives Bagley/#2

Kings trade Barnes/#13
Kings receive Kuzma

At 2, OKC could land Clingan to have a huge defensive frontcourt. Or take Risacher and spread the floor more. Wallace is going to be a backup to Williams. The cost is low for a talent upgrade and balancing the roster.

Washington gets a PG and SG young enough to play with Coulibaly/Avdija. Washington also has the cap space to throw money at Claxton. That is a young team that can grow. Washington with 12 and 13 could get 2 of Holland, da Silva, Carter, Ware, Edey. Some of these are reaches but fit team need.

Kings are able to finally land Kuzma at the cost of #13. Kuzma is better than any pick at #13 on the Kings timeline.

Giddey is going to be a role player with SGA/Holmgren/Williams as the primaries. He is better as a PG than a SF.
Colbinii
RealGM
Posts: 34,243
And1: 21,854
Joined: Feb 13, 2013

Re: Washington/OKC/Sacramento 

Post#2 » by Colbinii » Thu Jun 20, 2024 5:44 pm

I don't see OKC trading Wallace and 2 picks to move up. Giddey + Picks should be more than enough.

Kings trade has been tossed around, sure.

Washington doesn't need to trade back, they need to hit on the top.
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,008
And1: 22,426
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: Washington/OKC/Sacramento 

Post#3 » by nate33 » Thu Jun 20, 2024 5:54 pm

This isn't a 3-way trade. It's two separate trades.

The WAS/SAC part has been discussed a lot. I'd do it from the Wizards perspective, but most Sacramento fans wouldn't unless the Wizards also include the #26, which I would be unwilling to do. Let's just say that the two sides are pretty close to agreement on the trade, but not quite there.

The OKC/WAS trade is new. I would do this from Washington's perspective. I don't really value Giddey much, but the #12 + 2025 pick + Wallace is enough for the #2 pick.
Colbinii
RealGM
Posts: 34,243
And1: 21,854
Joined: Feb 13, 2013

Re: Washington/OKC/Sacramento 

Post#4 » by Colbinii » Thu Jun 20, 2024 5:56 pm

nate33 wrote:This isn't a 3-way trade. It's two separate trades.

The WAS/SAC part has been discussed a lot. I'd do it from the Wizards perspective, but most Sacramento fans wouldn't unless the Wizards also include the #26, which I would be unwilling to do. Let's just say that the two sides are pretty close to agreement on the trade, but not quite there.


Again, a couple 2nds back to Washington would easily fix the #26 inclusion :banghead:
jayjaysee
King of the Trade Board
Posts: 20,872
And1: 7,834
Joined: Aug 05, 2012

Re: Washington/OKC/Sacramento 

Post#5 » by jayjaysee » Thu Jun 20, 2024 6:03 pm

Presti’s trade package feels like 2 in a normal draft. And we’ve heard for months this is not a normal draft.

Really decent sized overpay when asking for Wallace here

I think Sac and Washington should do their trade. It always gets bickered over for seconds/26th. But it’s close enough without the fluff that a deal should be worked out
daoneandonly
RealGM
Posts: 15,948
And1: 4,137
Joined: May 27, 2004
Location: Masalaland
   

Re: Washington/OKC/Sacramento 

Post#6 » by daoneandonly » Thu Jun 20, 2024 6:04 pm

Dont see anything outgoing for the Wiz that warrants this return
Deuteronomy 30:19 wrote:I call heaven and earth to witness against you today, that I have set before you life and death, blessing and curse. Therefore choose life, that you and your offspring may live
User avatar
TGW
RealGM
Posts: 13,327
And1: 6,693
Joined: Oct 22, 2010

Re: Washington/OKC/Sacramento 

Post#7 » by TGW » Thu Jun 20, 2024 6:29 pm

Giddey or Wallace...I don't see OKC moving both in a deal like this.
Some random troll wrote:Not to sound negative, but this team is owned by an arrogant cheapskate, managed by a moron and coached by an idiot. Recipe for disaster.
cjmcallist
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,838
And1: 869
Joined: Jul 27, 2018
 

Re: Washington/OKC/Sacramento 

Post#8 » by cjmcallist » Thu Jun 20, 2024 7:13 pm

Feels like an overpay from OKC's perspective.

It's relevant, but I'm also curious - where would Wallace be picked in this draft? He was #10 last year, still 20 years old. Low usage and low volume but shot over 41% from 3, played excellent defense, and was extremely consistent.
OGSactownballer
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,689
And1: 1,364
Joined: Oct 02, 2005

Re: Washington/OKC/Sacramento 

Post#9 » by OGSactownballer » Thu Jun 20, 2024 9:16 pm

I’ve been crystal clear that a Barnes/filler/13 for Kuzma/26 and Wash 2nd is a pretty balanced deal.

I know most Kings fans here want it to be 2nds going back not 14 but I’m in favor of trading back anyway to lower our roster cost obligation going forward and I don’t feel that the drop off is that much.

I don’t understand the inclusion of OKC here at all because I don’t think that Wash should be moving off number 2.
OGSactownballer
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,689
And1: 1,364
Joined: Oct 02, 2005

Re: Washington/OKC/Sacramento 

Post#10 » by OGSactownballer » Thu Jun 20, 2024 9:17 pm

cjmcallist wrote:Feels like an overpay from OKC's perspective.

It's relevant, but I'm also curious - where would Wallace be picked in this draft? He was #10 last year, still 20 years old. Low usage and low volume but shot over 41% from 3, played excellent defense, and was extremely consistent.


Top three this year because of known ability and ceiling.

So yes, it’s an overpay but I also don’t think Wash should move off 2.
The Beam King
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,749
And1: 774
Joined: Mar 01, 2006
Location: Sacramento, CA
 

Re: Washington/OKC/Sacramento 

Post#11 » by The Beam King » Fri Jun 21, 2024 12:57 pm

I personally hate it for the Kings. I'm not a fan of Kuzma in the slightest. I wouldn't give up a pick foe him but I'm also not a fan of Kuzmas game. All stats no substance.

Return to Trades and Transactions