NotACat wrote:Orlando has no interest in Simons, they only want 2 way players.
then why did they draft Jett Howard?
Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger
NotACat wrote:Orlando has no interest in Simons, they only want 2 way players.
NotACat wrote:Orlando has no interest in Simons, they only want 2 way players.
lordjeff05 wrote:I don’t think the idea of just having Ayton hanging around will be as appealing for the organization as so did you make it sound. He’s got two years left, he plays the same position as your top 10 pick and Portland is getting ready for the 2025 draft.
You bring him off the bench and he becomes a negative asset. You start him and you delay development of your new center. You start them both and you clog the paint for star guard. I’m biased but I don’t think it makes sense to keep him.
zzaj wrote:lordjeff05 wrote:I don’t think the idea of just having Ayton hanging around will be as appealing for the organization as so did you make it sound. He’s got two years left, he plays the same position as your top 10 pick and Portland is getting ready for the 2025 draft.
You bring him off the bench and he becomes a negative asset. You start him and you delay development of your new center. You start them both and you clog the paint for star guard. I’m biased but I don’t think it makes sense to keep him.
You have to consider the Blazers’ perspective here.
Scoot/Sharpe/Ant/Ayton only played 5 games together last season. That quartet is basically still an unknown.
Clingan has so far been a low minutes player and is coming off a foot injury. Probably the worst thing the Blazers could do is hand Clingan the keys with no healthy backup (fingers crossed for TL) and say “okay, play 38 minutes a game…”
Much better to keep Ayton short-term, allow his contract to gain even a little more value and let Clingan adjust to the NBA IN A 20 minute role.
Return to Trades and Transactions