Lakers get Allen, DFS
Lakers give DLo, Vando, Vincent, LAL29FRP, LAL28swap
Lakers save $5.5m so they can use TaxMLE to get a guard.
Cavs get CamJ, Sharpe
Cavs give Allen, Jerome
Cavs get a starting PF so that Mobley can move to C, they get a backup C too so they don't lose much size overall.
Nets get DLo, Vando, Vincent, LAL29FRP, LAL28swap
Nets give CamJ, DFS, Sharpe
Nets get an unprotected FRP and swap for last of their veteran player assets.
Lakers-Cavs-Nets
Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger
Lakers-Cavs-Nets
- zimpy27
- Forum Mod
- Posts: 45,487
- And1: 43,630
- Joined: Jul 13, 2014
Lakers-Cavs-Nets
"Let's play some basketball!" - Fergie
Re: Lakers-Cavs-Nets
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 21,966
- And1: 13,894
- Joined: Nov 13, 2019
-
Re: Lakers-Cavs-Nets
Feel like if thats all allen costed NOP would've acquired him already
Re: Lakers-Cavs-Nets
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 58,819
- And1: 35,907
- Joined: Dec 22, 2010
-
Re: Lakers-Cavs-Nets
I'm not high on Cam Johnson so this would be a pass for me. The Cavs can't start him with a Mitchell/Garland in the playoffs so this is downgrading a starter in order to improve the bench.
Also, from a value standpoint the Cavs are sending out the most valuable player, taking back more salary, and the Nets are walking away with all the draft capital.
Also, from a value standpoint the Cavs are sending out the most valuable player, taking back more salary, and the Nets are walking away with all the draft capital.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Re: Lakers-Cavs-Nets
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,024
- And1: 293
- Joined: Jun 14, 2009
Re: Lakers-Cavs-Nets
Cavs say no, would need to send Niang to the Lakers and Wood and the swap to the Cavs. Lakers also would likely need to send Rui + filler instead of Vincent. Lakers save 3 million
Lakers - Russell, Rui, Vanderbilt, Wood, 1st, and 1st swap
Lakers - Allen, DFS, Niang, Jerome
Cleveland - Allen, Jerome, and Niang
Cleveland - Johnson, Sharpe, Wood, and 1st swap
Nets - DFS, Cam Johnson, and Sharpe
Nets - Rui, Russell, Vanderbilt, and 1st
Lakers - Russell, Rui, Vanderbilt, Wood, 1st, and 1st swap
Lakers - Allen, DFS, Niang, Jerome
Cleveland - Allen, Jerome, and Niang
Cleveland - Johnson, Sharpe, Wood, and 1st swap
Nets - DFS, Cam Johnson, and Sharpe
Nets - Rui, Russell, Vanderbilt, and 1st
Re: Lakers-Cavs-Nets
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,077
- And1: 12,894
- Joined: Jul 15, 2013
- Location: Ogden, UT
-
Re: Lakers-Cavs-Nets
Cavs getting screwed. Giving up the best asset and getting 0 in return? Why would they do this?
Jordan Walsh > Lonnie Walker and Charles Bassey
Re: Lakers-Cavs-Nets
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,418
- And1: 7,502
- Joined: Feb 22, 2008
Re: Lakers-Cavs-Nets
Cleveland declines. Cam just isn't enough for the Cavs. I would consider something around Rui/Cam for Allen. Rui can start at the 4 and Cam could start at the 3 or come off the bench. The Cavs can then slide Mobley to the 5 and have a realistic 5-out offense.
The Cavs would send Allen to LA and LeVert to Brooklyn. The Lakers send a lightly protected 2029 first to Brooklyn, maybe top-5 in 2029, top-3 in 2030 and 2031, then unprotected.
The Cavs would send Allen to LA and LeVert to Brooklyn. The Lakers send a lightly protected 2029 first to Brooklyn, maybe top-5 in 2029, top-3 in 2030 and 2031, then unprotected.
Re: Lakers-Cavs-Nets
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,024
- And1: 293
- Joined: Jun 14, 2009
Re: Lakers-Cavs-Nets
DowJones wrote:Cleveland declines. Cam just isn't enough for the Cavs. I would consider something around Rui/Cam for Allen. Rui can start at the 4 and Cam could start at the 3 or come off the bench. The Cavs can then slide Mobley to the 5 and have a realistic 5-out offense.
The Cavs would send Allen to LA and LeVert to Brooklyn. The Lakers send a lightly protected 2029 first to Brooklyn, maybe top-5 in 2029, top-3 in 2030 and 2031, then unprotected.
I’d make sure Niang is sent out as well in this scenario with Wood coming back even just for salary matching purposes. Or send Cavs Knecht with Niang going out and they keep the first.
Re: Lakers-Cavs-Nets
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,418
- And1: 7,502
- Joined: Feb 22, 2008
Re: Lakers-Cavs-Nets
bgrep14 wrote:DowJones wrote:Cleveland declines. Cam just isn't enough for the Cavs. I would consider something around Rui/Cam for Allen. Rui can start at the 4 and Cam could start at the 3 or come off the bench. The Cavs can then slide Mobley to the 5 and have a realistic 5-out offense.
The Cavs would send Allen to LA and LeVert to Brooklyn. The Lakers send a lightly protected 2029 first to Brooklyn, maybe top-5 in 2029, top-3 in 2030 and 2031, then unprotected.
I’d make sure Niang is sent out as well in this scenario with Wood coming back even just for salary matching purposes. Or send Cavs Knecht with Niang going out and they keep the first.
Yeah, as a Cavs fan I would expect Cleveland to fight like hell to keep LeVert and send Niang instead. Maybe Brooklyn is ok eating an extra year of Niang to get that LA first.
Re: Lakers-Cavs-Nets
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,672
- And1: 1,773
- Joined: Sep 24, 2009
-
Re: Lakers-Cavs-Nets
When did the going rate of good, but not great role players go to unprotected FRPs?
Re: Lakers-Cavs-Nets
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,908
- And1: 1,575
- Joined: Jun 19, 2007
-
Re: Lakers-Cavs-Nets
Bad for Brooklyn. We're not taking on Vanderbilt's long term money, not even Vincent, and the value return is light.
Some people really have a way with words. Other people... not... have... way.
-- Steve Martin
-- Steve Martin
Return to Trades and Transactions