Toronto out: Olynyk, Agbaji
Toronto in: Looney, Okoro (S&T 3/45 or so)
Cleveland trade: Okoro (S&T 3/45 or so)
Cleveland in: Moody, Agbaji
GSW trade: Looney, Moody
GSW in: Olynyk
Why for Toronto: add a low usage 3/D starting SF
Why for Cleveland: add depth at the wings, should still duck tax.. if not add a min filler
Why for GSW: add a stretch big
Why for Okoro: get more $ than QO
Toronto - GSW - Cleveland
Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger
Toronto - GSW - Cleveland
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 21,964
- And1: 13,892
- Joined: Nov 13, 2019
-
Re: Toronto - GSW - Cleveland
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,964
- And1: 15,705
- Joined: Sep 08, 2020
-
Re: Toronto - GSW - Cleveland
I don't think anyone wants to pay 3/45 for Okoro.
Re: Toronto - GSW - Cleveland
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 21,964
- And1: 13,892
- Joined: Nov 13, 2019
-
Re: Toronto - GSW - Cleveland
BK_2020 wrote:I don't think anyone wants to pay 3/45 for Okoro.
hmm cheaper the better for me. i figure he will get 3/40 to 45 or more otherwise he is better off signing QO
Re: Toronto - GSW - Cleveland
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,964
- And1: 15,705
- Joined: Sep 08, 2020
-
Re: Toronto - GSW - Cleveland
Godaddycurse wrote:BK_2020 wrote:I don't think anyone wants to pay 3/45 for Okoro.
hmm cheaper the better for me. i figure he will get 3/40 to 45 or more otherwise he is better off signing QO
Doesn't RJ Barrett start at SF for the Raps? Then they have Bruce Brown to back up the forward spots and a bunch of young guys who could do the Okoro job of playing ok defense and not taking any shots.
Re: Toronto - GSW - Cleveland
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,587
- And1: 3,532
- Joined: Jul 16, 2009
- Location: Toronto, ON
- Contact:
Re: Toronto - GSW - Cleveland
BK_2020 wrote:Godaddycurse wrote:BK_2020 wrote:I don't think anyone wants to pay 3/45 for Okoro.
hmm cheaper the better for me. i figure he will get 3/40 to 45 or more otherwise he is better off signing QO
Doesn't RJ Barrett start at SF for the Raps? Then they have Bruce Brown to back up the forward spots and a bunch of young guys who could do the Okoro job of playing ok defense and not taking any shots.
RJ is better suited at SG because he utilizes his size to get in the paint against smaller guards.
Re: Toronto - GSW - Cleveland
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,964
- And1: 15,705
- Joined: Sep 08, 2020
-
Re: Toronto - GSW - Cleveland
Raptors Realtor wrote:BK_2020 wrote:Godaddycurse wrote:
hmm cheaper the better for me. i figure he will get 3/40 to 45 or more otherwise he is better off signing QO
Doesn't RJ Barrett start at SF for the Raps? Then they have Bruce Brown to back up the forward spots and a bunch of young guys who could do the Okoro job of playing ok defense and not taking any shots.
RJ is better suited at SG because he utilizes his size to get in the paint against smaller guards.
Defense is not obligated to defend by position. There's no rule that says SG must guard SG and SF must guard SF. If Barrett was being pushed down a position by someone who's bigger and capable of ISO scoring, there might be some merit in having him at SG to give him easier matchups but having Barrett at SG and Okoro at SF is essentially just a clerical change. If RJ Barrett's at SG and Okoro is at SF, opposing defenses will just have their weaker defender on Okoro.
Re: Toronto - GSW - Cleveland
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,587
- And1: 3,532
- Joined: Jul 16, 2009
- Location: Toronto, ON
- Contact:
Re: Toronto - GSW - Cleveland
BK_2020 wrote:Raptors Realtor wrote:BK_2020 wrote:Doesn't RJ Barrett start at SF for the Raps? Then they have Bruce Brown to back up the forward spots and a bunch of young guys who could do the Okoro job of playing ok defense and not taking any shots.
RJ is better suited at SG because he utilizes his size to get in the paint against smaller guards.
Defense is not obligated to defend by position. There's no rule that says SG must guard SG and SF must guard SF. If Barrett was being pushed down a position by someone who's bigger and capable of ISO scoring, there might be some merit in having him at SG to give him easier matchups but having Barrett at SG and Okoro at SF is essentially just a clerical change. If RJ Barrett's at SG and Okoro is at SF, opposing defenses will just have their weaker defender on Okoro.
Yes, I understand this, however he actually played SG for us the majority of the time last season, and as mentioned in my previous post, had a lot of success bullying his way to the paint against smaller guards. That wasn't me speculating.
Re: Toronto - GSW - Cleveland
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 58,814
- And1: 35,907
- Joined: Dec 22, 2010
-
Re: Toronto - GSW - Cleveland
I'm not sure Okoro agrees to that. I don't think the Warriors can start Olynyk. I'd want to ship out Moody for a backup big. I don't know, maybe it's salvageable.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Re: Toronto - GSW - Cleveland
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 17,426
- And1: 7,164
- Joined: Mar 30, 2006
- Location: Whereever you go - there you are
Re: Toronto - GSW - Cleveland
Feels easier if you just cut out Cleveland. Okoro's got more on-court experience than Moody but given his offensive limitations I'm not sure he's really better as a long-term guy. Toronto can rent Moody for a year and the cost is cheap enough that if he doesn't look useful they can just let him walk (and Toronto isn't exactly all-in for next season).
Olynyk gives GS a different rotation center option with spacing. With their current depth (no several for one star trade) Moody looks still buried on the wing.
Olynyk gives GS a different rotation center option with spacing. With their current depth (no several for one star trade) Moody looks still buried on the wing.
Return to Trades and Transactions