Cleveland and Atlanta revisited
Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger
Cleveland and Atlanta revisited
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,230
- And1: 3,954
- Joined: Mar 19, 2015
- Location: Puerto Rico
-
Cleveland and Atlanta revisited
Cleveland gets: De'Andre Hunter
Atlanta gets: Jaylon Tyson, Georges Niang, Ty Jerome and 2 2nds (2025 and 2026 via Cavs)
Why?
Cleveland gets their starting SF.
Atlanta gets a good prospect and unload Hunter's contract.
PG: Darius Garland / Craig Porter Jr.
SG: Donovan Mitchell / Max Strus / Sam Merrill
SF: De'Andre Hunter / Caris LeVert / Emoni Bates
PF: Evan Mobley / Dean Wade / Luke Travers
C: Jarrett Allen / Khalifa Diop
Coach: Kenny Atkinson
Atlanta gets: Jaylon Tyson, Georges Niang, Ty Jerome and 2 2nds (2025 and 2026 via Cavs)
Why?
Cleveland gets their starting SF.
Atlanta gets a good prospect and unload Hunter's contract.
PG: Darius Garland / Craig Porter Jr.
SG: Donovan Mitchell / Max Strus / Sam Merrill
SF: De'Andre Hunter / Caris LeVert / Emoni Bates
PF: Evan Mobley / Dean Wade / Luke Travers
C: Jarrett Allen / Khalifa Diop
Coach: Kenny Atkinson
Re: Cleveland and Atlanta revisited
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 58,814
- And1: 35,907
- Joined: Dec 22, 2010
-
Re: Cleveland and Atlanta revisited
I wouldn't give up Tyler for Hunter.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Re: Cleveland and Atlanta revisited
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,964
- And1: 15,705
- Joined: Sep 08, 2020
-
Re: Cleveland and Atlanta revisited
Ty Jerome is just Ty, not Tyler.
Re: Cleveland and Atlanta revisited
- mcfly1204
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,918
- And1: 2,565
- Joined: Oct 31, 2008
Re: Cleveland and Atlanta revisited
BK_2020 wrote:Ty Jerome is just Ty, not Tyler.
Either he thinks Hunter is utterly worthless, or he was conflating 'Tyler' with 'Tyson'. I'm going to assume the latter.
Well at least we're not Detroit!
Re: Cleveland and Atlanta revisited
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,964
- And1: 15,705
- Joined: Sep 08, 2020
-
Re: Cleveland and Atlanta revisited
mcfly1204 wrote:BK_2020 wrote:Ty Jerome is just Ty, not Tyler.
Either he thinks Hunter is utterly worthless, or he was conflating 'Tyler' with 'Tyson'. I'm going to assume the latter.
A Ty Jerome's career would be one of the high end outcomes for a 20th pick in the draft.
Re: Cleveland and Atlanta revisited
- mcfly1204
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,918
- And1: 2,565
- Joined: Oct 31, 2008
Re: Cleveland and Atlanta revisited
BK_2020 wrote:mcfly1204 wrote:BK_2020 wrote:Ty Jerome is just Ty, not Tyler.
Either he thinks Hunter is utterly worthless, or he was conflating 'Tyler' with 'Tyson'. I'm going to assume the latter.
A Ty Jerome's career would be one of the high end outcomes for a 20th pick in the draft.
I'd say that if Tyson had an equivalent career to LeVert, also a 20th pick, I would not complain too much. Clearly not a star, but a rotation player who can get you 30 on a hot night.
Well at least we're not Detroit!
Re: Cleveland and Atlanta revisited
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 58,814
- And1: 35,907
- Joined: Dec 22, 2010
-
Re: Cleveland and Atlanta revisited
mcfly1204 wrote:BK_2020 wrote:Ty Jerome is just Ty, not Tyler.
Either he thinks Hunter is utterly worthless, or he was conflating 'Tyler' with 'Tyson'. I'm going to assume the latter.
Yeah, I meant Tyson.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Re: Cleveland and Atlanta revisited
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,964
- And1: 15,705
- Joined: Sep 08, 2020
-
Re: Cleveland and Atlanta revisited
mcfly1204 wrote:BK_2020 wrote:mcfly1204 wrote:Either he thinks Hunter is utterly worthless, or he was conflating 'Tyler' with 'Tyson'. I'm going to assume the latter.
A Ty Jerome's career would be one of the high end outcomes for a 20th pick in the draft.
I'd say that if Tyson had an equivalent career to LeVert, also a 20th pick, I would not complain too much. Clearly not a star, but a rotation player who can get you 30 on a hot night.
Or he might end up like 4 players drafted before the 20th pick of the 2019 draft and be out of the league by 2024. Not even counting Cam Reddish who is probably on his last leg.
Re: Cleveland and Atlanta revisited
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,621
- And1: 3,161
- Joined: Jun 12, 2009
Re: Cleveland and Atlanta revisited
This looks like pretty good value. Maybe an overpay by CLE, but that's what you have to do in 'many-4-one' trades in the NBA.
Would not have an issue with this.
Would not have an issue with this.
Re: Cleveland and Atlanta revisited
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,147
- And1: 2,495
- Joined: Jul 18, 2013
-
Re: Cleveland and Atlanta revisited
Pretty sure this locks the Cavs into the tax unless they let Okoro walk for nothing, so we should S&T Okoro here rather than some of the other salary. Okoro's from the Atlanta area too.
Edit: But I like what Okoro and Tyson do for the roster more than Hunter, so I'd pass anyway.
Edit: But I like what Okoro and Tyson do for the roster more than Hunter, so I'd pass anyway.
Re: Cleveland and Atlanta revisited
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 58,814
- And1: 35,907
- Joined: Dec 22, 2010
-
Re: Cleveland and Atlanta revisited
tidho wrote:This looks like pretty good value. Maybe an overpay by CLE, but that's what you have to do in 'many-4-one' trades in the NBA.
Would not have an issue with this.
Hunter has averaged 50 games a season over his career and he's well paid. The Cavs biggest issue is keeping everyone on the court. I'd consider offering future cap for him in a Niang and LeVert swap, but I wouldn't go beyond that.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Re: Cleveland and Atlanta revisited
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,621
- And1: 3,161
- Joined: Jun 12, 2009
Re: Cleveland and Atlanta revisited
jbk1234 wrote:tidho wrote:This looks like pretty good value. Maybe an overpay by CLE, but that's what you have to do in 'many-4-one' trades in the NBA.
Would not have an issue with this.
Hunter has averaged 50 games a season over his career and he's well paid. The Cavs biggest issue is keeping everyone on the court. I'd consider offering future cap for him in a Niang and LeVert swap, but I wouldn't go beyond that.
I disagree that that's CLE's biggest issue. Moving Niang is a big win in this trade. I'd be fine with the Niang/LeVert deal too. That only works if ATL is fully motivated to get out of that contract.
Re: Cleveland and Atlanta revisited
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 58,814
- And1: 35,907
- Joined: Dec 22, 2010
-
Re: Cleveland and Atlanta revisited
tidho wrote:jbk1234 wrote:tidho wrote:This looks like pretty good value. Maybe an overpay by CLE, but that's what you have to do in 'many-4-one' trades in the NBA.
Would not have an issue with this.
Hunter has averaged 50 games a season over his career and he's well paid. The Cavs biggest issue is keeping everyone on the court. I'd consider offering future cap for him in a Niang and LeVert swap, but I wouldn't go beyond that.
I disagree that that's CLE's biggest issue. Moving Niang is a big win in this trade. I'd be fine with the Niang/LeVert deal too. That only works if ATL is fully motivated to get out of that contract.
I want off of Niang's contract as I don't think he should see the floor in the playoffs, but that doesn't mean he has no value during the regular season as a minutes eater. There were times, especially against meh teams, where the spacing he provided was helpful during the regular season.
Also, the Cavs don't have to dump all of Niang's salary to stay out of the tax when Okoro ends up signing the QO. They can take back a smaller deal, attach a second and stay out of the tax. I wouldn't trade Tyson to dump Niang. He could prove to be the best SF we've had (an admittedly low bar) since LBJ left and he's on a rookie deal for the next 4 years.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Re: Cleveland and Atlanta revisited
- babyjax13
- RealGM
- Posts: 35,061
- And1: 17,577
- Joined: Jul 02, 2006
- Location: Fresno, eating Birria
-
Re: Cleveland and Atlanta revisited
jbk1234 wrote:tidho wrote:jbk1234 wrote:
Hunter has averaged 50 games a season over his career and he's well paid. The Cavs biggest issue is keeping everyone on the court. I'd consider offering future cap for him in a Niang and LeVert swap, but I wouldn't go beyond that.
I disagree that that's CLE's biggest issue. Moving Niang is a big win in this trade. I'd be fine with the Niang/LeVert deal too. That only works if ATL is fully motivated to get out of that contract.
I want off of Niang's contract as I don't think he should see the floor in the playoffs, but that doesn't mean he has no value during the regular season as a minutes eater. There were times, especially against meh teams, where the spacing he provided was helpful during the regular season.
Also, the Cavs don't have to dump all of Niang's salary to stay out of the tax when Okoro ends up signing the QO. They can take back a smaller deal, attach a second and stay out of the tax. I wouldn't trade Tyson to dump Niang. He could prove to be the best SF we've had (an admittedly low bar) since LBJ left and he's on a rookie deal for the next 4 years.
I think Niang is there to help keep Mitchell happy. They've been pretty close since they were on the Jazz and he is a notorious 'good vibes' guy. I agree re: playoffs, not super great except for spot minutes (like ... 5 per game).

JazzMatt13 wrote:just because I think aliens probably have to do with JFK, doesn't mean my theory that Jazz will never get Wiggins, isn't true.
JColl
Re: Cleveland and Atlanta revisited
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,024
- And1: 293
- Joined: Jun 14, 2009
Re: Cleveland and Atlanta revisited
Pretty hard pass for Cleveland in my opinion. The best offer I'd make for Hunter is Okoro (S+T), Jerome, and Niang.
Return to Trades and Transactions