Thybulle and Williams to SAC

Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger

SNPA
General Manager
Posts: 9,053
And1: 8,388
Joined: Apr 15, 2020

Re: Thybulle and Williams to SAC 

Post#41 » by SNPA » Sun Sep 8, 2024 6:07 am

tester551 wrote:
the_process wrote:Attempt at compromise (which will fail
miserably but hey! Something to complain about!):

POR gets R Holmes, J Davis, J McDaniels, and lotto protected 2027 SAC 1st (which expires if not conveyed)
SAC gets M Thybulle, R Williams, and 27 GSW 2nd
WSH gets K Huerter and C Jones

I actually like this cutting out Washington:

Kings -> Thybulle + RW3
Blazers -> Huerter + McDaniels + '27 LP 1st

Kings don't get the extra 2nd because they keep Jones


***Edit -> It looks this would put Kings in the tax. Swapping McDaniels for Lyles would fix that issue. ***

Why would Sac include a first?

Sac is entering a timeframe where packaging future firsts is going to be the main path to improvement. Those have to land impactful players.

It’s a fireable trade IMO. Both of them.
User avatar
babyjax13
RealGM
Posts: 35,061
And1: 17,577
Joined: Jul 02, 2006
Location: Fresno, eating Birria
     

Re: Thybulle and Williams to SAC 

Post#42 » by babyjax13 » Sun Sep 8, 2024 9:23 am

SNPA wrote:
tester551 wrote:
the_process wrote:Attempt at compromise (which will fail
miserably but hey! Something to complain about!):

POR gets R Holmes, J Davis, J McDaniels, and lotto protected 2027 SAC 1st (which expires if not conveyed)
SAC gets M Thybulle, R Williams, and 27 GSW 2nd
WSH gets K Huerter and C Jones

I actually like this cutting out Washington:

Kings -> Thybulle + RW3
Blazers -> Huerter + McDaniels + '27 LP 1st

Kings don't get the extra 2nd because they keep Jones


***Edit -> It looks this would put Kings in the tax. Swapping McDaniels for Lyles would fix that issue. ***

Why would Sac include a first?

Sac is entering a timeframe where packaging future firsts is going to be the main path to improvement. Those have to land impactful players.

It’s a fireable trade IMO. Both of them.

It would just be replicating the mistake they made with the original Huerter deal.
Image

JazzMatt13 wrote:just because I think aliens probably have to do with JFK, doesn't mean my theory that Jazz will never get Wiggins, isn't true.

JColl

Return to Trades and Transactions