Cle/Sac/Orl

[toooskies]

Cleveland:
Garland for Murray/Brooks/Future lottery prot 1st
Sacramento:
Murray/Future lottery prot. 1st for Smith/Whitmore
Rockets:
Brooks/Smith/Whitmore for Garland

Or there might be a similar one where Kuzma ends up in Sacramento, and Garland in Washington with other pieces/picks pushed around.

Wouldn't take that if I were Houston. Probably needs to be Eason or Green instead of Smith.

[jbk1234]

Cleveland:
Garland for Murray/Brooks/Future lottery prot 1st
Sacramento:
Murray/Future lottery prot. 1st for Smith/Whitmore
Rockets:
Brooks/Smith/Whitmore for Garland

Or there might be a similar one where Kuzma ends up in Sacramento, and Garland in Washington with other pieces/picks pushed around.

Wouldn't take that if I were Houston. Probably needs to be Eason or Green instead of Smith.

Unless you think Green is a better starter next to Mitchell than Garland (I don't), I can't see the Cavs making that trade. Green will be making as much as Garland after next summer. I can squint and see Murray as a better fit if Atkinson can't get more out of the current roster.

[toooskies]

Cleveland:
Garland for Murray/Brooks/Future lottery prot 1st
Sacramento:
Murray/Future lottery prot. 1st for Smith/Whitmore
Rockets:
Brooks/Smith/Whitmore for Garland

Or there might be a similar one where Kuzma ends up in Sacramento, and Garland in Washington with other pieces/picks pushed around.

Wouldn't take that if I were Houston. Probably needs to be Eason or Green instead of Smith.

Unless you think Green is a better starter next to Mitchell than Garland (I don't), I can't see the Cavs making that trade. Green will be making as much as Garland after next summer. I can squint and see Murray as a better fit if Atkinson can't get more out of the current roster.

Green would be going to SAC in this hypothetical, the Cleveland return would still be Murray/Brooks/1st. (Which I wouldn't take for chemistry reasons with Mitchell/Brooks, but it's at least reasonable.)