Lakers get Vuc -bulls get Ayton

Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger

kobe_vs_jordan
RealGM
Posts: 10,659
And1: 5,065
Joined: Jan 07, 2012
Location: Atl
   

Re: Lakers get Vuc -bulls get Ayton 

Post#21 » by kobe_vs_jordan » Mon Oct 14, 2024 4:50 pm

scottyg wrote:How bout the bulls take Robert Williams and Jeremy Grant instead ?

What’s it cost the bulls?
User avatar
Laimbeer
RealGM
Posts: 42,956
And1: 15,114
Joined: Aug 12, 2009
Location: Cabin Creek
     

Re: Lakers get Vuc -bulls get Ayton 

Post#22 » by Laimbeer » Tue Oct 15, 2024 5:00 pm

Tim Lehrbach wrote:Unless Vanderbilt totally declines to useless or has a career-threatening injury, he should be opting out of his last year. That deal will have him as one of the lower-paid 27/28 year olds in the league by summer 2027. He's going to want to shoot for a multiyear deal, too. I did forget his player option is for 2027-2028 and not the prior year, so my earlier remark about the salary of Vincent not being significant is negated.

I really don't like having that pick tied up, though -- it's for sure not a "second round pick" if the Blazers own it, and it still has a small chance of conveying to the Bulls as a first, for that matter. I dunno, I haven't done the salary projections for '27, but surely the Blazers can afford that extra salary and still give out rookie-contract extensions?


Constantly injured forwards who can't shoot a lick aren't in demand. The dude is a bad contract, albeit a smaller one. I'd be surprised if he's not on his last deal. Lakers would move him into cap space so fast your head would spin.
Comments to rationalize bad contracts -
1) It's less than the MLE
2) He can be traded later
3) It's only __% of the cap
4) The cap is going up
5) It's only __ years
6) He's a good mentor/locker room guy

Return to Trades and Transactions