zimpy27 wrote:Mr Peanut wrote:zimpy27 wrote:
I can't even see a post that did that said the way he looked in preseason means the contract was bad though.
Maybe I'm missing it, can you highlight it?
"He doesn't look so great in preseason so far (<40% TS), not sure what that can tell us because it's preseason."
You did qualify it by saying it's uncertain what preseason can tell us. Regardless, the preseason games were brought into the discussion, along with dredging up a few months old thread just following those two mediocre games which came across as a bit disingenuous.
If someone had revived a months old thread after today's game where he scored 25/12/9 and suggested that had any bearing over justifying his contract it would be equally as bad. Small sample size in fairly meaningless games.
Well someone did just bump this thread after a couple good games. They didn't even qualify it like I did saying "it's just preseason".
So I can only assume what you and Snakebites are going to do..
Surprising behavior from a forum moderator I must admit.