[Charania]: Sacramento Trades McDaniels and a 2nd to San Antonio

Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger

SNPA
General Manager
Posts: 9,049
And1: 8,386
Joined: Apr 15, 2020

Re: [Charania]: Sacramento Trades McDaniels and a 2nd to San Antonio 

Post#61 » by SNPA » Thu Oct 17, 2024 3:19 pm

Scoot McGroot wrote:
SNPA wrote:
chrbal wrote:
I just saw they really are pursuing Doug. Never thought I’d see a trade made to clear space for McDermott

If this is it then damn…that’s dumb as hell.

However, if Dougie is a replacement for Huerter who gets packaged with draft capital for size then it’s very solid.

No team needs Huerter and McBuckets.


It also saves them nearly $3m in salary/tax costs, as they’re going to end up about $1m over the tax line to start the season? They’re much closer to getting under the tax line now in an eventual Huerter or Lyles trade.

That’s not what I’m hearing. Reporters are saying they are 5.8m under the tax before the signing of McBuckets which will counts as 2.1m. They can use the remaining to sign another vet, as flex in trade or wait and maybe go past the tax and up to the first apron if something really good comes along.
User avatar
Scoot McGroot
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 44,775
And1: 14,046
Joined: Feb 16, 2005
     

Re: [Charania]: Sacramento Trades McDaniels and a 2nd to San Antonio 

Post#62 » by Scoot McGroot » Thu Oct 17, 2024 3:38 pm

SNPA wrote:
Scoot McGroot wrote:
SNPA wrote:If this is it then damn…that’s dumb as hell.

However, if Dougie is a replacement for Huerter who gets packaged with draft capital for size then it’s very solid.

No team needs Huerter and McBuckets.


It also saves them nearly $3m in salary/tax costs, as they’re going to end up about $1m over the tax line to start the season? They’re much closer to getting under the tax line now in an eventual Huerter or Lyles trade.

That’s not what I’m hearing. Reporters are saying they are 5.8m under the tax before the signing of McBuckets which will counts as 2.1m. They can use the remaining to sign another vet, as flex in trade or wait and maybe go past the tax and up to the first apron if something really good comes along.


Think I figured it out. Smitty at Spotrac removed McDaniels from the spreadsheet, but he must auto calculate the salary totals, and he didn't remove McDaniels' salary from the total calculations in his Kings spreadsheets. So, when he shows the Kings $1m under the tax, that is essentially what they were pre-McDaniels trade, and he never updated the total calculations, while he removed McDaniels from the upper spread sheet.

Looks like the Kings should be $3.74m under the tax when Dougie signs. So, they have tax room to add a 15th. Or, more realistically, they stay at 14 and have enough tax room to accommodate the possibility that all their players max out incentives for the year and would end up about $274k under the tax line, in that possibility.
User avatar
codydaze
Forum Mod - Kings
Forum Mod - Kings
Posts: 6,470
And1: 5,024
Joined: Jul 06, 2013
Location: Sacramento, CA
     

Re: [Charania]: Sacramento Trades McDaniels and a 2nd to San Antonio 

Post#63 » by codydaze » Thu Oct 17, 2024 4:23 pm

Scoot McGroot wrote:
SNPA wrote:
Scoot McGroot wrote:
It also saves them nearly $3m in salary/tax costs, as they’re going to end up about $1m over the tax line to start the season? They’re much closer to getting under the tax line now in an eventual Huerter or Lyles trade.

That’s not what I’m hearing. Reporters are saying they are 5.8m under the tax before the signing of McBuckets which will counts as 2.1m. They can use the remaining to sign another vet, as flex in trade or wait and maybe go past the tax and up to the first apron if something really good comes along.


Think I figured it out. Smitty at Spotrac removed McDaniels from the spreadsheet, but he must auto calculate the salary totals, and he didn't remove McDaniels' salary from the total calculations in his Kings spreadsheets. So, when he shows the Kings $1m under the tax, that is essentially what they were pre-McDaniels trade, and he never updated the total calculations, while he removed McDaniels from the upper spread sheet.

Looks like the Kings should be $3.74m under the tax when Dougie signs. So, they have tax room to add a 15th. Or, more realistically, they stay at 14 and have enough tax room to accommodate the possibility that all their players max out incentives for the year and would end up about $274k under the tax line, in that possibility.


Okay that makes a lot more sense. I thought I was going crazy trying to figure out where that extra tax allocation was coming from.
User avatar
Rapcity_11
RealGM
Posts: 24,803
And1: 9,694
Joined: Jul 26, 2006
     

Re: [Charania]: Sacramento Trades McDaniels and a 2nd to San Antonio 

Post#64 » by Rapcity_11 » Fri Oct 18, 2024 12:10 am

Scoot McGroot wrote:
shrink wrote:Can anyone explain why Jalen McDaniels was suddenly so awful last year? 17% 3P?

Was asking myself the same thing. He was pretty solid his last year or two in Charlotte/Philly.
He’s 26 - will some other team pick him up as a vet min free agent, just based on his 6-9 archetype?

I assume he gets ONE more chance based on his archetype, but he's also getting to the age now where he's not much potential. One last chance to prove himself?

Like, Indy waived Kendall Brown yesterday, which isn't surprising, but the timing was a bit weird. Maybe clearing a roster spot for a Jalen (minimum) signing to compete with Swider for the 15th spot?


Honestly, it was mind-blowing how bad McDaniels was last year. It looked like to forgot how to play basketball.
SNPA
General Manager
Posts: 9,049
And1: 8,386
Joined: Apr 15, 2020

Re: [Charania]: Sacramento Trades McDaniels and a 2nd to San Antonio 

Post#65 » by SNPA » Fri Oct 18, 2024 4:47 am

Scoot McGroot wrote:
SNPA wrote:
Scoot McGroot wrote:
It also saves them nearly $3m in salary/tax costs, as they’re going to end up about $1m over the tax line to start the season? They’re much closer to getting under the tax line now in an eventual Huerter or Lyles trade.

That’s not what I’m hearing. Reporters are saying they are 5.8m under the tax before the signing of McBuckets which will counts as 2.1m. They can use the remaining to sign another vet, as flex in trade or wait and maybe go past the tax and up to the first apron if something really good comes along.


Think I figured it out. Smitty at Spotrac removed McDaniels from the spreadsheet, but he must auto calculate the salary totals, and he didn't remove McDaniels' salary from the total calculations in his Kings spreadsheets. So, when he shows the Kings $1m under the tax, that is essentially what they were pre-McDaniels trade, and he never updated the total calculations, while he removed McDaniels from the upper spread sheet.

Looks like the Kings should be $3.74m under the tax when Dougie signs. So, they have tax room to add a 15th. Or, more realistically, they stay at 14 and have enough tax room to accommodate the possibility that all their players max out incentives for the year and would end up about $274k under the tax line, in that possibility.

If McNair gave himself all the options quoted in this post, and lands at $274k under the tax if everything maxes and he does nothing… that is damn good cap management.

He still needs to trade Huerter + pick for size. (Huerter/1st for BeefStew).
User avatar
Scoot McGroot
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 44,775
And1: 14,046
Joined: Feb 16, 2005
     

Re: [Charania]: Sacramento Trades McDaniels and a 2nd to San Antonio 

Post#66 » by Scoot McGroot » Fri Oct 18, 2024 7:56 pm

SNPA wrote:
Scoot McGroot wrote:
SNPA wrote:That’s not what I’m hearing. Reporters are saying they are 5.8m under the tax before the signing of McBuckets which will counts as 2.1m. They can use the remaining to sign another vet, as flex in trade or wait and maybe go past the tax and up to the first apron if something really good comes along.


Think I figured it out. Smitty at Spotrac removed McDaniels from the spreadsheet, but he must auto calculate the salary totals, and he didn't remove McDaniels' salary from the total calculations in his Kings spreadsheets. So, when he shows the Kings $1m under the tax, that is essentially what they were pre-McDaniels trade, and he never updated the total calculations, while he removed McDaniels from the upper spread sheet.

Looks like the Kings should be $3.74m under the tax when Dougie signs. So, they have tax room to add a 15th. Or, more realistically, they stay at 14 and have enough tax room to accommodate the possibility that all their players max out incentives for the year and would end up about $274k under the tax line, in that possibility.

If McNair gave himself all the options quoted in this post, and lands at $274k under the tax if everything maxes and he does nothing… that is damn good cap management.

He still needs to trade Huerter + pick for size. (Huerter/1st for BeefStew).


Would be better if he could fit a 15th. Indy built their cap this year that if they max out all the incentives, which essentially requires a championship, they would be under the luxury tax line by $1. Some call it good cap management, I call it an amazing dedication to NEVER paying the tax. :lol:
NCHeels2008
RealGM
Posts: 12,947
And1: 3,005
Joined: Aug 24, 2005

Re: [Charania]: Sacramento Trades McDaniels and a 2nd to San Antonio 

Post#67 » by NCHeels2008 » Sat Oct 19, 2024 7:10 am

Just another sign we need expansion, McDaniels is easily worth a roster spot
BoogieTime
General Manager
Posts: 8,371
And1: 3,060
Joined: Feb 09, 2017
 

Re: [Charania]: Sacramento Trades McDaniels and a 2nd to San Antonio 

Post#68 » by BoogieTime » Sat Oct 19, 2024 9:42 am

chrbal wrote:
gswhoops wrote:Looks like this move was to clear a spot for Dougie McBuckets


I just saw they really are pursuing Doug. Never thought I’d see a trade made to clear space for McDermott


Why? When did 2nds become more important than rotational players (if it works)?

He looked crisp in his one preseason game to me, and was solid til the end of last year
chrbal
RealGM
Posts: 21,550
And1: 1,994
Joined: Mar 02, 2001
Contact:

Re: [Charania]: Sacramento Trades McDaniels and a 2nd to San Antonio 

Post#69 » by chrbal » Sat Oct 19, 2024 3:39 pm

BoogieTime wrote:
chrbal wrote:
gswhoops wrote:Looks like this move was to clear a spot for Dougie McBuckets


I just saw they really are pursuing Doug. Never thought I’d see a trade made to clear space for McDermott


Why? When did 2nds become more important than rotational players (if it works)?

He looked crisp in his one preseason game to me, and was solid til the end of last year



Wasn’t about the picks at all. I just think it’s odd to clear a roster spot for him
User avatar
blind prophet
RealGM
Posts: 10,574
And1: 3,306
Joined: Dec 08, 2011
 

Re: [Charania]: Sacramento Trades McDaniels and a 2nd to San Antonio 

Post#70 » by blind prophet » Sat Oct 19, 2024 6:39 pm

BoogieTime wrote:
chrbal wrote:
gswhoops wrote:Looks like this move was to clear a spot for Dougie McBuckets


I just saw they really are pursuing Doug. Never thought I’d see a trade made to clear space for McDermott


Why? When did 2nds become more important than rotational players (if it works)?

He looked crisp in his one preseason game to me, and was solid til the end of last year


The thread is intriguing.

We sold so many seconds for straight up cash over the years.

We use one to dump salary instead. Then all the criticism.

Weird.
chrbal
RealGM
Posts: 21,550
And1: 1,994
Joined: Mar 02, 2001
Contact:

Re: [Charania]: Sacramento Trades McDaniels and a 2nd to San Antonio 

Post#71 » by chrbal » Sat Oct 19, 2024 8:59 pm

blind prophet wrote:
BoogieTime wrote:
chrbal wrote:
I just saw they really are pursuing Doug. Never thought I’d see a trade made to clear space for McDermott


Why? When did 2nds become more important than rotational players (if it works)?

He looked crisp in his one preseason game to me, and was solid til the end of last year


The thread is intriguing.

We sold so many seconds for straight up cash over the years.

We use one to dump salary instead. Then all the criticism.

Weird.


Seconds are irrelevant in my point, Doug is better than McDaniels. I just think it’s odd to clear a roster spot for Doug
User avatar
zimpy27
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 45,483
And1: 43,626
Joined: Jul 13, 2014

Re: [Charania]: Sacramento Trades McDaniels and a 2nd to San Antonio 

Post#72 » by zimpy27 » Sat Oct 19, 2024 9:15 pm

chrbal wrote:
blind prophet wrote:
BoogieTime wrote:
Why? When did 2nds become more important than rotational players (if it works)?

He looked crisp in his one preseason game to me, and was solid til the end of last year


The thread is intriguing.

We sold so many seconds for straight up cash over the years.

We use one to dump salary instead. Then all the criticism.

Weird.


Seconds are irrelevant in my point, Doug is better than McDaniels. I just think it’s odd to clear a roster spot for Doug


They didn't clear one for Doug. They were at 14 spots before moving McDaniels. Doug brings them back up to 14.

They still have another spot and are $3.7m under the tax.

I think.they will use the money they have under apron ($7.5m) for a buyout player or in a trade where they bring in $7.5 more than they send.
"Let's play some basketball!" - Fergie
User avatar
Scoot McGroot
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 44,775
And1: 14,046
Joined: Feb 16, 2005
     

Re: [Charania]: Sacramento Trades McDaniels and a 2nd to San Antonio 

Post#73 » by Scoot McGroot » Sun Oct 20, 2024 5:15 pm

zimpy27 wrote:
chrbal wrote:
blind prophet wrote:
The thread is intriguing.

We sold so many seconds for straight up cash over the years.

We use one to dump salary instead. Then all the criticism.

Weird.


Seconds are irrelevant in my point, Doug is better than McDaniels. I just think it’s odd to clear a roster spot for Doug


They didn't clear one for Doug. They were at 14 spots before moving McDaniels. Doug brings them back up to 14.

They still have another spot and are $3.7m under the tax.

I think.they will use the money they have under apron ($7.5m) for a buyout player or in a trade where they bring in $7.5 more than they send.



I can’t imagine they’ll cross the tax line, let alone go all the way up to the first apron. My best guess is they wait a while, and play the end of roster 10 day contract type dance and eventually fill the 15th roster spot, but maybe stay $1.2m from the tax line in case Sabonis makes All-NBA?

Return to Trades and Transactions