Clax to MEM in January

Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger

_GH0ST_
Senior
Posts: 591
And1: 656
Joined: Mar 28, 2021
   

Re: Clax to MEM in January 

Post#21 » by _GH0ST_ » Fri Oct 18, 2024 8:54 pm

Colbinii wrote:
_GH0ST_ wrote:I think Claxton is more expensive than this. He's played over 70 games a season, has a bargain contract and he is still not old.

Clarke and Kennard don't have much value. Aldama is good but not great. Your pick should be unprotected and add few seconds or swaps.


How is 28 Million this year considered a bargain?

I guess it's not just for this year. 27 million this year but he will earn at least 2 million less every year and he is earning 20 million in the last year of his contract lol
YayBasketball
Junior
Posts: 403
And1: 140
Joined: Apr 26, 2024

Re: Clax to MEM in January 

Post#22 » by YayBasketball » Fri Oct 18, 2024 11:49 pm

Clax to NOP in January. McCullom or Ingram to 3rd team, assets to BKN.
QMemphis
Rookie
Posts: 1,009
And1: 597
Joined: May 22, 2018
     

Re: Clax to MEM in January 

Post#23 » by QMemphis » Sat Oct 19, 2024 2:36 am

My dream summer was adding Bridges and Claxton. Now post Edey pick no way we go this direction. Claxton and Edey can’t play together that severely limits what we would want to do both financially and on the court.
psman2
General Manager
Posts: 8,835
And1: 5,900
Joined: Feb 12, 2016
 

Re: Clax to MEM in January 

Post#24 » by psman2 » Sat Oct 19, 2024 3:00 am

QMemphis wrote:My dream summer was adding Bridges and Claxton. Now post Edey pick no way we go this direction. Claxton and Edey can’t play together that severely limits what we would want to do both financially and on the court.


If Edey shows he has a 3pt shoot, then they could. Clax is a good guarding the perimeter and switching. But we don't need an expensive backup big, zero chance we allocate our cap like this.
DonaldSanders
Head Coach
Posts: 7,171
And1: 9,264
Joined: Jan 22, 2012
   

Re: Clax to MEM in January 

Post#25 » by DonaldSanders » Sat Oct 19, 2024 4:30 am

If Claxton has this little value (which I don't think he does) then I'd love to see my GSW jump in and 1-up this trade. No chance Brooklyn does this.
JKiddy
Starter
Posts: 2,241
And1: 495
Joined: Jul 28, 2002

Re: Clax to MEM in January 

Post#26 » by JKiddy » Sat Oct 19, 2024 4:51 am

There are a few issues here:

A) The Nets have zero motivation to take 40 cents on a dollar now as they are rebuilding within now before FA signings and drafting players for many upcoming seasons

B) Claxton wants to stay in BK

C) BK wants to build around Claxton

The only thing I can see them considering is if Memphis had Edey and multiple firsts IF Claxton and BK are no longer a match (doubtful as of October 2024).
Paradise
Nets Forum: Asst. To The RM
Posts: 39,018
And1: 11,965
Joined: Aug 16, 2012
Location: NYC
     

Clax to MEM in January 

Post#27 » by Paradise » Sun Oct 20, 2024 1:59 am

Colbinii wrote:
_GH0ST_ wrote:I think Claxton is more expensive than this. He's played over 70 games a season, has a bargain contract and he is still not old.

Clarke and Kennard don't have much value. Aldama is good but not great. Your pick should be unprotected and add few seconds or swaps.


How is 28 Million this year considered a bargain?

Lol Are you aware of anything about the Nets?
Colbinii
RealGM
Posts: 34,243
And1: 21,854
Joined: Feb 13, 2013

Re: Clax to MEM in January 

Post#28 » by Colbinii » Sun Oct 20, 2024 3:50 am

Paradise wrote:
Colbinii wrote:
_GH0ST_ wrote:I think Claxton is more expensive than this. He's played over 70 games a season, has a bargain contract and he is still not old.

Clarke and Kennard don't have much value. Aldama is good but not great. Your pick should be unprotected and add few seconds or swaps.


How is 28 Million this year considered a bargain?

Lol Are you aware of anything about the Nets?


Yeah. I'm also aware of the going rate for Centers.
User avatar
Chuck Everett
RealGM
Posts: 19,133
And1: 21,965
Joined: May 28, 2004
Location: Los Angeles
   

Re: Clax to MEM in January 

Post#29 » by Chuck Everett » Sun Oct 20, 2024 6:24 am

Claxton's just a guy and would get bodied in the West. Doesn't help Memphis. He can't guard beefier centers.
"Kill 'em with Grindness."
User avatar
BarbaGrizz
Analyst
Posts: 3,610
And1: 1,753
Joined: May 25, 2007
Location: Brazil
     

Re: Clax to MEM in January 

Post#30 » by BarbaGrizz » Sun Oct 20, 2024 6:21 pm

This deal would´ve make sense for Memphis if we didn´t drafted Edey
Celtic Koala wrote:The only player from the 90s that would have been a top 10 player in the modern league would have been MJ and if you stretch it a bit Olajuwon

bstein14 wrote:Mikan is much worse than Luka Garza, who can't even make an NBA roster today
jbk1234
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 58,814
And1: 35,906
Joined: Dec 22, 2010
 

Re: Clax to MEM in January 

Post#31 » by jbk1234 » Sun Oct 20, 2024 8:18 pm

ConSarnit wrote:
JRoy wrote:
ConSarnit wrote:
This isn't that far off the going rate for guys like Claxton (Centers who fall somewhere between 15-20 ranking position-wise). Look at what Claxton's contemporaries have gone for over the past 5 years. Poeltl, Capela, Allen, Adams. The average value these guys are returning is somewhere between the 15th-20th pick. Maybe MEM needs to throw in a 2nd but the value isn't that far off based on recent history. The C market is not strong right now because almost everyone has a "solid" center and the one's that don't are the bottom feeders that don't really have a need for one. If MEM is willing to wait until JAN that could also drive the price down as someone like Poeltl could shake loose and the asking price wouldn't be that high (non-lotto 1st). Maybe they take a flier on RW3 for cheap. I personally don't believe the market for non top 10 C's is all that strong. I will concede that BKN holding Claxton makes sense as his contract is declining and that could up his value for a trade for next off-season (or even the one after). I just don't know if it's ever going to get into guaranteed lotto pick territory.


Poeltl went for a lotto pick.

Can’t imagine why BKN would prefer that handful of mediocrity to Claxton.


And all those other guys went for a pick in the 20's. There were also extenuating circumstances in that Poeltl trade: it was a bad trade by the Raptors and the Raptors were not expecting to give up a pick that high (I would also bet SAS was not expecting to get a top 10 pick out of that trade). If BKN is hoping to repeat that then I say good luck. I also don't know why BKN needs Claxton when they are going to be bad for the next 2-3 years. I'm not saying they should take the MEM deal but it's not far off from what I'd expect they'd actually get. They should ask for more but I don't think they'll get much more, especially from MEM who I assumed drafted Edey to be a starter in the near future. If I were BKN I would target NOP and try to take back McCollum and the surplus assets that would come from that type of deal.


I mean the Cavs ate some bad salary mid season in addition to the first they gave up to get Allen. The former really mattered as there were very few teams in a position to do so. Also, while the pick belonged to the Bucks, it wasn't protected.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.

Return to Trades and Transactions