Keita Bates-Diop

Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger

shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,292
And1: 19,304
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Keita Bates-Diop 

Post#1 » by shrink » Sat Oct 19, 2024 3:12 pm

The Timberwolves have looked to find a trade for veteran Keita Bates-Diop, sources said, to allow Minnesota to keep a personal favorite of president Tim Connelly on the roster: PJ Dozier.

Jake Fischer

Any predictions of a team willing to absorb his vet min deal for free?

MIN can’t send out cash because of apron restrictions, Dozier is only guaranteed for $1 mil, so MIN would probably waive him to get down to 15 before they included one of their limited 2nds to pay a team to take KBD.
chrbal
RealGM
Posts: 21,550
And1: 1,994
Joined: Mar 02, 2001
Contact:

Re: Keita Bates-Diop 

Post#2 » by chrbal » Sat Oct 19, 2024 3:54 pm

I’m not sure he gets signed once he clears waivers. Yeah he’s played every season since he got drafted, but I just don’t see a team just absorbing his contract. If any trade, it would be a player for player trade in my opinion.

Who knows though, maybe Charlotte takes him for the second round pick.
Godaddycurse
RealGM
Posts: 21,961
And1: 13,891
Joined: Nov 13, 2019
 

Re: Keita Bates-Diop 

Post#3 » by Godaddycurse » Sat Oct 19, 2024 4:05 pm

yea i dont see why any team will take him for free
winforlose
RealGM
Posts: 13,057
And1: 5,694
Joined: Feb 27, 2020

Re: Keita Bates-Diop 

Post#4 » by winforlose » Sun Oct 20, 2024 1:16 am

Godaddycurse wrote:yea i dont see why any team will take him for free


The only possible reason is a team would be afraid someone else might grab him and want to secure the contract. That said, I doubt very much that any team is worried about not securing KBD outside of an immediate trade.
User avatar
Scoot McGroot
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 44,775
And1: 14,046
Joined: Feb 16, 2005
     

Re: Keita Bates-Diop 

Post#5 » by Scoot McGroot » Sun Oct 20, 2024 1:47 am

chrbal wrote:I’m not sure he gets signed once he clears waivers. Yeah he’s played every season since he got drafted, but I just don’t see a team just absorbing his contract. If any trade, it would be a player for player trade in my opinion.

Who knows though, maybe Charlotte takes him for the second round pick.



I could see a team happy to sign him for a non gtd vet minimum. But he’s paid $600k over the vet minimum, and it’s not compensated by the league to bring him back down to a vet minimum for tax purposes, etc, so it’s just not a huge want? But I could def see Indy trying to sign him for he 15th spot on a true vet minimum.
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,292
And1: 19,304
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: Keita Bates-Diop 

Post#6 » by shrink » Sun Oct 20, 2024 3:32 am

Scoot McGroot wrote:
chrbal wrote:I’m not sure he gets signed once he clears waivers. Yeah he’s played every season since he got drafted, but I just don’t see a team just absorbing his contract. If any trade, it would be a player for player trade in my opinion.

Who knows though, maybe Charlotte takes him for the second round pick.

I could see a team happy to sign him for a non gtd vet minimum. But he’s paid $600k over the vet minimum, and it’s not compensated by the league to bring him back down to a vet minimum for tax purposes, etc, so it’s just not a huge want? But I could def see Indy trying to sign him for he 15th spot on a true vet minimum.

I have been confused by this for about a month.

Spotrac says KBD was signed in PHX using the vet min exception, and vet min deals can be 1 or 2 years. Does this mean Year One is vet min, but the player option wasn’t, and is now just a standard contract? Is it illegal for a contract to have a “vet min” option on it, because it would make more sense for both PHX and about the same for KDB to do it that way, and have the league pay the difference?
Chinook
Head Coach
Posts: 6,646
And1: 3,784
Joined: Jan 12, 2015
       

Re: Keita Bates-Diop 

Post#7 » by Chinook » Sun Oct 20, 2024 4:04 am

shrink wrote:
Scoot McGroot wrote:
chrbal wrote:I’m not sure he gets signed once he clears waivers. Yeah he’s played every season since he got drafted, but I just don’t see a team just absorbing his contract. If any trade, it would be a player for player trade in my opinion.

Who knows though, maybe Charlotte takes him for the second round pick.

I could see a team happy to sign him for a non gtd vet minimum. But he’s paid $600k over the vet minimum, and it’s not compensated by the league to bring him back down to a vet minimum for tax purposes, etc, so it’s just not a huge want? But I could def see Indy trying to sign him for he 15th spot on a true vet minimum.

I have been confused by this for about a month.

Spotrac says KBD was signed in PHX using the vet min exception, and vet min deals can be 1 or 2 years. Does this mean Year One is vet min, but the player option wasn’t, and is now just a standard contract? Is it illegal for a contract to have a “vet min” option on it, because it would make more sense for both PHX and about the same for KDB to do it that way, and have the league pay the difference?


The min exception can apply to one- or two-year contracts, but the rebate only happens with one-year deals. So Keita isn't getting any more money this year by being on the second year of a deal as opposed to signing a new one-year deal as a free agent this summer. However, a team acquiring him in a trade would owe more in salary and potentially tax than they would if he were a free agent they signed.

So if a team is taking him on, it probably makes sense that they'd want cash or other compensation to account for the extra money they're paying. I like Keita a lot and think he's a viable role-player, but I doubt there's such a market for his services that a team would consider not having to bid for him legit incentive to pay the difference.
wolves_89
General Manager
Posts: 8,103
And1: 4,585
Joined: Jul 10, 2012
 

Re: Keita Bates-Diop 

Post#8 » by wolves_89 » Sun Oct 20, 2024 4:33 am

It seems like Keita isn't with the team at this point, but I can't see the Wolves eating the $13-15M (salary plus luxury tax) to waive him. I'll be curious to see if the Wolves end up paying a 2nd to someone to get him off the books.
User avatar
zimpy27
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 45,482
And1: 43,626
Joined: Jul 13, 2014

Re: Keita Bates-Diop 

Post#9 » by zimpy27 » Sun Oct 20, 2024 5:43 am

They probably should have worked this out in the KAT trade..
"Let's play some basketball!" - Fergie
Mavrelous
Forum Mod - Mavericks
Forum Mod - Mavericks
Posts: 19,431
And1: 17,232
Joined: Aug 20, 2020

Re: Keita Bates-Diop 

Post#10 » by Mavrelous » Sun Oct 20, 2024 5:54 am

Trade a swap of 2026 pick to OKC or SAS, it's a 2nd degree swap after UTA, not worth much, but worth enough to eat vet min contract.
Defense wins draft lotteries!
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,292
And1: 19,304
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: Keita Bates-Diop 

Post#11 » by shrink » Sun Oct 20, 2024 6:08 am

zimpy27 wrote:They probably should have worked this out in the KAT trade..

It was a little curious. New York had to send out 3-4 contracts, and they probably didn’t carre which ones MIN or CHA took. The Wolves ended up with the vet. Was that a coincidence because MIN preferred KBD because they are a contender, or did CHA refuse KDB because he’s a little more expensive than the “vet min + $1” players CHA received and waived?

I agree that if KBD isn’t a vet min, any team that wants him will likely just hope he gets bought out, and they’ll sign him to a vet min deal. However, I still think it’s unlikely. Tim Connelly might like his old buddy PJ Dozier, but he was the one who negotiated that it’s only worth $1 mil guaranteed. If the three options are trade KDB with a 2nd, waive KDB, or waive Dozier, I think the prudent choice considering lux taxes is to drop PJ. I guess we’ll know in the next two days.
Devilanche
General Manager
Posts: 7,755
And1: 2,449
Joined: Dec 22, 2010

Re: Keita Bates-Diop 

Post#12 » by Devilanche » Sun Oct 20, 2024 6:42 am

For what it’s worth PJ dozier has a skillset that’s intriguing enough to spend a second to dump KDB .
He’s been on the verge of breaking out sooner or later since forever. Been high on him since his OKC days .
MoneyTalks41890 wrote:No I’m myopic and shortsighted and I want my pile of draft picks.


meekrab wrote:Nothing Jerry Rein$dorf loves more than a visit from Cash Considerations.
chrbal
RealGM
Posts: 21,550
And1: 1,994
Joined: Mar 02, 2001
Contact:

Re: Keita Bates-Diop 

Post#13 » by chrbal » Sun Oct 20, 2024 12:58 pm

Scoot McGroot wrote:
chrbal wrote:I’m not sure he gets signed once he clears waivers. Yeah he’s played every season since he got drafted, but I just don’t see a team just absorbing his contract. If any trade, it would be a player for player trade in my opinion.

Who knows though, maybe Charlotte takes him for the second round pick.



I could see a team happy to sign him for a non gtd vet minimum. But he’s paid $600k over the vet minimum, and it’s not compensated by the league to bring him back down to a vet minimum for tax purposes, etc, so it’s just not a huge want? But I could def see Indy trying to sign him for he 15th spot on a true vet minimum.


Yeah. I didn’t say I don’t think any team will sign him, just that I don’t think it’s a guarantee. I can see him get signed to a team following a trade or significant injury to a player. He’s more likely to go to a playoff team and it could be a while with a lot of them dealing with tax issues.
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,292
And1: 19,304
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: Keita Bates-Diop 

Post#14 » by shrink » Sun Oct 20, 2024 4:54 pm

If MIN trades away or waives KDB’s $2.65 mil contract, then they keep Dozier, so his $1 mil guarantee becomes a standard $2.09. Here’s the taxable payroll for the three options.

1. Waive KBD $4.74 mil, ($2.65 dead money)
2. Waive Dozier. $3.65 mil, ($1 mil dead money)
3. Trade KBD with 2nd: $2.09 mil, ($0 dead money)

I suppose with the lux taxes the owner would have to pay on the $1.55 mil difference (between #2 and #3), it might be worth a 2nd. But Connelly would need to greatly prefer Dozier to give up a 2nd, and the owners would have to care more about those incremental lux taxes than losing one of their few remaining 2nds.
chrbal
RealGM
Posts: 21,550
And1: 1,994
Joined: Mar 02, 2001
Contact:

Re: Keita Bates-Diop 

Post#15 » by chrbal » Sun Oct 20, 2024 4:55 pm

shrink wrote:If MIN trades away or waives KDB’s $2.65 mil contract, then they keep Dozier, so his $1 mil guarantee becomes a standard $2.09. Here’s the taxable payroll for the three options.

1. Waive KBD $4.74 mil, ($2.65 dead money)
2. Waive Dozier. $3.65 mil, ($1 mil dead money)
3. Trade KBD with 2nd: $2.09 mil, ($0 dead money)

I suppose with the lux taxes the owner would have to pay on the $1.55 mil difference (between #2 and #3), it might be worth a 2nd. But Connelly would need to greatly prefer Dozier to give up a 2nd, and the owners would have to care more about those incremental lux taxes than losing one of their few remaining 2nds.


I think they eventually just waive Dozier unless they can trade him and the new team is only on the hook for the guaranteed money.
User avatar
Scoot McGroot
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 44,775
And1: 14,046
Joined: Feb 16, 2005
     

Re: Keita Bates-Diop 

Post#16 » by Scoot McGroot » Sun Oct 20, 2024 5:01 pm

shrink wrote:
Scoot McGroot wrote:
chrbal wrote:I’m not sure he gets signed once he clears waivers. Yeah he’s played every season since he got drafted, but I just don’t see a team just absorbing his contract. If any trade, it would be a player for player trade in my opinion.

Who knows though, maybe Charlotte takes him for the second round pick.

I could see a team happy to sign him for a non gtd vet minimum. But he’s paid $600k over the vet minimum, and it’s not compensated by the league to bring him back down to a vet minimum for tax purposes, etc, so it’s just not a huge want? But I could def see Indy trying to sign him for he 15th spot on a true vet minimum.

I have been confused by this for about a month.

Spotrac says KBD was signed in PHX using the vet min exception, and vet min deals can be 1 or 2 years. Does this mean Year One is vet min, but the player option wasn’t, and is now just a standard contract? Is it illegal for a contract to have a “vet min” option on it, because it would make more sense for both PHX and about the same for KDB to do it that way, and have the league pay the difference?



Vet minimum is only reimbursed by the league on one year deals. Adding an option year, which someone wants (player or team) for value eliminates the reimbursable, so the cap hit is equal to what their actual minimum salary is based on years of service, rather than equal to a 2 year vet minimum salary.

So, a guy like KBD signed a 2 year vet minimum contract, but his cap hit was higher than the “vet minimum” because it was a multi year deal, rather than a one year deal, and actual vet minimum salary was higher than a 2 yos vet minimum.

…if that makes sense? I rambled a bit, I admit.
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,292
And1: 19,304
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: Keita Bates-Diop 

Post#17 » by shrink » Sun Oct 20, 2024 5:04 pm

Scoot McGroot wrote:
shrink wrote:
Scoot McGroot wrote:I could see a team happy to sign him for a non gtd vet minimum. But he’s paid $600k over the vet minimum, and it’s not compensated by the league to bring him back down to a vet minimum for tax purposes, etc, so it’s just not a huge want? But I could def see Indy trying to sign him for he 15th spot on a true vet minimum.

I have been confused by this for about a month.

Spotrac says KBD was signed in PHX using the vet min exception, and vet min deals can be 1 or 2 years. Does this mean Year One is vet min, but the player option wasn’t, and is now just a standard contract? Is it illegal for a contract to have a “vet min” option on it, because it would make more sense for both PHX and about the same for KDB to do it that way, and have the league pay the difference?



Vet minimum is only reimbursed by the league on one year deals. Adding an option year, which someone wants (player or team) for value eliminates the reimbursable, so the cap hit is equal to what their actual minimum salary is based on years of service, rather than equal to a 2 year vet minimum salary.

So, a guy like KND signed a 2 year vet minimum contract, but his cap hit was higher than the “vet minimum” because it was a multi year deal, rather than a one year deal, and actual vet minimum salary was higher than a 2 yos vet minimum.

…if that makes sense? I rambled a bit, I admit.

Made sense. I’ve been here forever, and I still learn something new here all the time.

Thanks Scoot and Chinook!

EDIT: btw, since I’m already asking for help … I know the most recent CBA changed the boundaries (not every $5 mil any more) and rates (lower/lower, higher/higher) for lux taxes, but I don’t know of a good site to see what those new rates and boundaries are. I always used our boy Larry Coon’s numbers before when calculating taxes by hand, but it’s out of date. Anyone got a good link?
xdrta+
RealGM
Posts: 10,793
And1: 7,893
Joined: Jun 18, 2018
 

Re: Keita Bates-Diop 

Post#18 » by xdrta+ » Mon Oct 21, 2024 12:10 am

shrink wrote:EDIT: btw, since I’m already asking for help … I know the most recent CBA changed the boundaries (not every $5 mil any more) and rates (lower/lower, higher/higher) for lux taxes, but I don’t know of a good site to see what those new rates and boundaries are. I always used our boy Larry Coon’s numbers before when calculating taxes by hand, but it’s out of date. Anyone got a good link?


The easiest way is the CBA itself, Article VII, Section 2 (d) (i). Going to page 207 at the link gets you there. The charts are there with examples.

Edit: The page numbers a little confusing. It's actually page 183 in the document but I find I have to put in 207 in the page icon to get there.
User avatar
Scoot McGroot
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 44,775
And1: 14,046
Joined: Feb 16, 2005
     

Re: Keita Bates-Diop 

Post#19 » by Scoot McGroot » Mon Oct 21, 2024 2:33 am

shrink wrote:
Scoot McGroot wrote:
shrink wrote:I have been confused by this for about a month.

Spotrac says KBD was signed in PHX using the vet min exception, and vet min deals can be 1 or 2 years. Does this mean Year One is vet min, but the player option wasn’t, and is now just a standard contract? Is it illegal for a contract to have a “vet min” option on it, because it would make more sense for both PHX and about the same for KDB to do it that way, and have the league pay the difference?



Vet minimum is only reimbursed by the league on one year deals. Adding an option year, which someone wants (player or team) for value eliminates the reimbursable, so the cap hit is equal to what their actual minimum salary is based on years of service, rather than equal to a 2 year vet minimum salary.

So, a guy like KND signed a 2 year vet minimum contract, but his cap hit was higher than the “vet minimum” because it was a multi year deal, rather than a one year deal, and actual vet minimum salary was higher than a 2 yos vet minimum.

…if that makes sense? I rambled a bit, I admit.

Made sense. I’ve been here forever, and I still learn something new here all the time.

Thanks Scoot and Chinook!

EDIT: btw, since I’m already asking for help … I know the most recent CBA changed the boundaries (not every $5 mil any more) and rates (lower/lower, higher/higher) for lux taxes, but I don’t know of a good site to see what those new rates and boundaries are. I always used our boy Larry Coon’s numbers before when calculating taxes by hand, but it’s out of date. Anyone got a good link?


https://ak-static.cms.nba.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/4/2023/06/2023-CBA-Summary.pdf

Pages 3 and 4 of that document. This is what I constantly reach back to in order to remind myself of the new changes.

Edit: but realized after linking this you probably wanted the actual brackets, not the costs. Def my bad there. :lol:

Return to Trades and Transactions