Ill offer this deal for:
-Houston to land Jimmy Butler
-Miami to get back a younger wing along with draft picks and tax/salary/relief
-Los Angeles Lakers to get a veteran big
-Pistons leverage cap space to get a veteran forward and picks
To Houston (Trade Brooks, Adams, Green, 3 1sts)
-Jimmy Butler (1 year, $48.8 million plus P.O.)
To Miami (Trade Butler, waive Bryant + Larson + Richardson)
-Dillon Brooks (3 years, $63.3 million)
-Gabe Vincent (2 years, $21.5 million)
-Christian Wood (1 year, $3 million)
-Wendel Moore Jr. (1 year, $2.5 million)
-2027 Phoenix 1st round pick
-2028 Houston 1st round pick
-2029 Houston or Dallas or Phoenix 1st round pick (2nd most favourable)
To Los Angeles (Trade Vincent, Wood, 2 2nds)
-Steven Adams (1 year, $12.8 million)
To Detroit (Trade Moore)
-Jeff Green (1 year, $8 million)
-2025 Lakers 2nd round pick
-2027 Lakers 2nd round pick
Why?
-The Rockets add Butler to solidify themselves as a top 4 seed in west for moving forward as the deal allows them to keep existing rookie contract players
-The Heat move Butler for younger starting calibre wing, 3 picks and tax relief
-The Lakers add a veteran big while opening up a roster spot and salary relief for 2025-26
-Pistons leverage their immediate cap space to add a veteran wing and 2 2nds
Houston/Miami/Los Angeles Lakers/Detroit
Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger
Houston/Miami/Los Angeles Lakers/Detroit
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,631
- And1: 1,640
- Joined: Jan 10, 2007
Re: Houston/Miami/Los Angeles Lakers/Detroit
- LarsV8
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,147
- And1: 5,452
- Joined: Dec 13, 2009
-
Re: Houston/Miami/Los Angeles Lakers/Detroit
- Dillon Brooks is a key piece to what we are doing, not really interested in moving him.
- Jimmy Butler is excellent, but for all intents and purposes, he is a rental. We are not paying him max money into his late 30s. He can go to Brooklyn.
- 3 firsts for a meaningless rental for Butler is a non starter.
Max I would give would be 1 protected first or perhaps Cam Whitmore for a Butler rental, and that would be with non rotation filler salary, not key pieces like Brooks for FVV.
- Jimmy Butler is excellent, but for all intents and purposes, he is a rental. We are not paying him max money into his late 30s. He can go to Brooklyn.
- 3 firsts for a meaningless rental for Butler is a non starter.
Max I would give would be 1 protected first or perhaps Cam Whitmore for a Butler rental, and that would be with non rotation filler salary, not key pieces like Brooks for FVV.

Re: Houston/Miami/Los Angeles Lakers/Detroit
-
- Senior
- Posts: 656
- And1: 376
- Joined: Sep 15, 2020
-
Re: Houston/Miami/Los Angeles Lakers/Detroit
This is a vast overpay for a Butler rental. Not sure the Rockets need to send 1sts on top of Green and Brooks, but if they do it should be a single protected 1st at most.
Also would be good to figure out a way for Miami to avoid cutting Larsson. That kid is good and locked up for several years.
Also would be good to figure out a way for Miami to avoid cutting Larsson. That kid is good and locked up for several years.
Re: Houston/Miami/Los Angeles Lakers/Detroit
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,916
- And1: 4,128
- Joined: May 27, 2004
- Location: Masalaland
-
Re: Houston/Miami/Los Angeles Lakers/Detroit
3 firsts for Butler at his age and injury concerns seems a bit excessive, and I say that as someone who wants to see Houston fail
Deuteronomy 30:19 wrote:I call heaven and earth to witness against you today, that I have set before you life and death, blessing and curse. Therefore choose life, that you and your offspring may live
Re: Houston/Miami/Los Angeles Lakers/Detroit
-
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,393
- And1: 1,572
- Joined: Jun 24, 2022
-
Re: Houston/Miami/Los Angeles Lakers/Detroit
Way too much for Butler. If the Rockets re-sign him, they won’t be able to sign their core players. If they do not re-sign him, he is a rental. It’s pointless to trade assets for him.
Re: Houston/Miami/Los Angeles Lakers/Detroit
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 57,320
- And1: 18,439
- Joined: Jun 23, 2001
-
Re: Houston/Miami/Los Angeles Lakers/Detroit
Miami is not cutting Larrson and Houston isn't giving up 3 first round picks for Jimmy.
Re: Houston/Miami/Los Angeles Lakers/Detroit
-
- Forum Mod
- Posts: 7,040
- And1: 8,553
- Joined: Feb 29, 2004
- Location: A retirement village near you
-
Re: Houston/Miami/Los Angeles Lakers/Detroit
DET getting 2 SRPs for taking on $8M in salary seems close/reasonable based on July 2024 trades.
On the theory that simpler is better, Moore can be dropped from the trade. DET doesn't need to send out any money to take back less than $10M in salary.
Unless someone actually wants Moore Jr and wants to throw us a minor incentive, which I'd be totally fine with
On the theory that simpler is better, Moore can be dropped from the trade. DET doesn't need to send out any money to take back less than $10M in salary.
Unless someone actually wants Moore Jr and wants to throw us a minor incentive, which I'd be totally fine with
In a no-win argument, the first poster to Let It Go will at least retain some peace of mind
Re: Houston/Miami/Los Angeles Lakers/Detroit
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,631
- And1: 1,640
- Joined: Jan 10, 2007
Re: Houston/Miami/Los Angeles Lakers/Detroit
Kiss of Death wrote:Way too much for Butler. If the Rockets re-sign him, they won’t be able to sign their core players. If they do not re-sign him, he is a rental. It’s pointless to trade assets for him.
The OP is predicated on the Rockets and Butler mutually wanting a 2 year extension after this season thereby not affecting the Rockets long term cap flexibility.
The picks added were a framework. The Rockets could put heaving protection on their own 2028 pick (1-20 protected or extinguished) and make the Suns pick due if it’s outside top 10 or 15.
Re: Houston/Miami/Los Angeles Lakers/Detroit
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,550
- And1: 5,081
- Joined: Nov 04, 2017
-
Re: Houston/Miami/Los Angeles Lakers/Detroit
Why do we want Adams?
He isnt a cheap salary and is he even good anymore?
Injury issues
AND were giving up 2nds and Wood (who I view as being a useful floor spacing big when hes back)
If I want anyone in this deal that isnt Jimmy, I may want Brooks
if Jimmy was going to GS, I would then want to target Wiggins
He isnt a cheap salary and is he even good anymore?
Injury issues
AND were giving up 2nds and Wood (who I view as being a useful floor spacing big when hes back)
If I want anyone in this deal that isnt Jimmy, I may want Brooks
if Jimmy was going to GS, I would then want to target Wiggins
Return to Trades and Transactions