Jimmy to Milwaukee with NOP and LAL (no Midds)

Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger

User avatar
Laimbeer
RealGM
Posts: 42,955
And1: 15,114
Joined: Aug 12, 2009
Location: Cabin Creek
     

Re: Jimmy to Milwaukee with NOP and LAL (no Midds) 

Post#21 » by Laimbeer » Fri Jan 3, 2025 6:17 pm

kobe_vs_jordan wrote:
Scoot McGroot wrote:
kobe_vs_jordan wrote:People act like he has a 20 million a year contract. He over paid by a 5 million imo.


Right now, it's moreso the 4 guaranteed years, especially if the knee continues to be "balky".

He not out with a knee injury this time. Recently started ramping up.

He can have injury woes for the next 4 years or reach his upside. Who knows.


He hasn't played in a year so it's the "who knows" part that is the problem.
Comments to rationalize bad contracts -
1) It's less than the MLE
2) He can be traded later
3) It's only __% of the cap
4) The cap is going up
5) It's only __ years
6) He's a good mentor/locker room guy
kobe_vs_jordan
RealGM
Posts: 10,657
And1: 5,065
Joined: Jan 07, 2012
Location: Atl
   

Re: Jimmy to Milwaukee with NOP and LAL (no Midds) 

Post#22 » by kobe_vs_jordan » Fri Jan 3, 2025 6:54 pm

Scoot McGroot wrote:
kobe_vs_jordan wrote:
Scoot McGroot wrote:
Right now, it's moreso the 4 guaranteed years, especially if the knee continues to be "balky".

He not out with a knee injury this time. Recently started ramping up.

He can have injury woes for the next 4 years or reach his upside. Who knows.


Vanderbilt's journey back to the court has been lengthy (and filled with bad luck). Multiple foot surgeries during the summer followed his mid-foot sprain against Boston last February. Earlier this month it was released that the young forward experienced a fluid buildup in his left knee during his injury rehabilitation, delaying his return.


But yes. Either good stuff or bad stuff could happen. But teams are going to value Vanderbilt based on his current and recent play. Of which, there is none, and he's been injured. :dontknow:

Teams valuing him as injured and none playing is fine. But doesn’t mean lakers are paying the draft capital for the bucks to get their young star and save money.
kobe_vs_jordan
RealGM
Posts: 10,657
And1: 5,065
Joined: Jan 07, 2012
Location: Atl
   

Re: Jimmy to Milwaukee with NOP and LAL (no Midds) 

Post#23 » by kobe_vs_jordan » Fri Jan 3, 2025 6:58 pm

Laimbeer wrote:
kobe_vs_jordan wrote:
Scoot McGroot wrote:
Right now, it's moreso the 4 guaranteed years, especially if the knee continues to be "balky".

He not out with a knee injury this time. Recently started ramping up.

He can have injury woes for the next 4 years or reach his upside. Who knows.


He hasn't played in a year so it's the "who knows" part that is the problem.

Taking a year to recover means he won’t play in the next 4 years?

I could to see if he have a Lonzo ball or
Johnathan Issac path ahead of him for recovery.
User avatar
Scoot McGroot
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 44,771
And1: 14,037
Joined: Feb 16, 2005
     

Re: Jimmy to Milwaukee with NOP and LAL (no Midds) 

Post#24 » by Scoot McGroot » Fri Jan 3, 2025 6:59 pm

kobe_vs_jordan wrote:
Scoot McGroot wrote:
kobe_vs_jordan wrote:He not out with a knee injury this time. Recently started ramping up.

He can have injury woes for the next 4 years or reach his upside. Who knows.


Vanderbilt's journey back to the court has been lengthy (and filled with bad luck). Multiple foot surgeries during the summer followed his mid-foot sprain against Boston last February. Earlier this month it was released that the young forward experienced a fluid buildup in his left knee during his injury rehabilitation, delaying his return.


But yes. Either good stuff or bad stuff could happen. But teams are going to value Vanderbilt based on his current and recent play. Of which, there is none, and he's been injured. :dontknow:

Teams valuing him as injured and none playing is fine. But doesn’t mean lakers are paying the draft capital for the bucks to get their young star and save money.


Sure. Lakers can absolutely keep him and see if he's healthy to play consistently and either help their team, or be traded later.

Return to Trades and Transactions