Warriors, Blazers, Nets

Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger

nykballa2k4
RealGM
Posts: 31,063
And1: 7,434
Joined: Jul 26, 2004
Location: Kurt Rhombus is managing the defense...
       

Warriors, Blazers, Nets 

Post#1 » by nykballa2k4 » Mon Jan 6, 2025 8:47 pm

ESPN has this as legal, not sure if that's real or not...
update: not legal, so I will make changes and highlight with strike through and bold additions

Warriors trade Wiggins, Looney,Schroder, Anderson, Kuminga +GP and ATL SRP
get Ayton, Cam Johnson, Sharpe, Johnson(Keon).

*Disclaimer - I don't have a good feel for Kuminga trade value, I have he and Johnson both valued at 1 FRP for now, so that's the value in that swap. If this value is off, we can revisit with a FRP from GS to BKN added, but since I don't know, I didn't want to create an uproar.

Rationale: Warriors finally get back to a traditional lineup and one with appropriate weapons.
Curry-Buddy-Cam-Green-Ayton. Bench of Podz, Sharpe, TJD, Moody.

Blazers trade Ayton, get Wiggins, Looney
Rationale: Wiggins plays more of a position of need, is a more easy-to-move position. Sort of a hot/cold type player, but can fit in next to the pieces Blazers are building around. Allows Clingan to start, Williams, Looney, Reath all can factor in as needed. Assuming williams will be traded, but having two rim erasers isn't a bad thing.

Nets trade 2xjohnsons (Cam, Keon) and Sharpe. Get Schroder, SloMo, Kuminga +GP and ATL SRP
Rationale: Kuminga is the prize here, Nets can unleash him and see what he can be without fear of benching. other two pieces can be made available in future trades. Could see these pieces appealing to Miami or PHX as they go through the re-tool.
Numbers don't lie, people who use them do
Stand up to all hate
Stand up to Jewish hate
giberish
RealGM
Posts: 17,422
And1: 7,162
Joined: Mar 30, 2006
Location: Whereever you go - there you are

Re: Warriors, Blazers, Nets 

Post#2 » by giberish » Mon Jan 6, 2025 8:53 pm

GS can't trade Schroeder until right at the deadline, and then can't trade him back to the Nets. Just remaking half the roster late in the season is likely to make the team worse from the extended adjustment period - plus they've added Ayton.
nykballa2k4
RealGM
Posts: 31,063
And1: 7,434
Joined: Jul 26, 2004
Location: Kurt Rhombus is managing the defense...
       

Re: Warriors, Blazers, Nets 

Post#3 » by nykballa2k4 » Mon Jan 6, 2025 8:56 pm

giberish wrote:GS can't trade Schroeder until right at the deadline, and then can't trade him back to the Nets. Just remaking half the roster late in the season is likely to make the team worse from the extended adjustment period - plus they've added Ayton.

Yup, trusted the ESPN checker because fanspo was taking too long. Mistake. lesson learned. Changes made, but still point taken. All-star break is usually a decent window to acclimate new talent though.
Numbers don't lie, people who use them do
Stand up to all hate
Stand up to Jewish hate
xdrta+
RealGM
Posts: 10,789
And1: 7,888
Joined: Jun 18, 2018
 

Re: Warriors, Blazers, Nets 

Post#4 » by xdrta+ » Mon Jan 6, 2025 9:14 pm

The Warriors are right up against their hard cap (330k), but this trade has them taking in almost $3M more than they're sending out. That's without even considering Cam Johnson's unlikely incentives, which would add another $3.5M to their Apron salary.
BlazersBroncos
RealGM
Posts: 12,348
And1: 9,892
Joined: Oct 27, 2016

Re: Warriors, Blazers, Nets 

Post#5 » by BlazersBroncos » Mon Jan 6, 2025 9:14 pm

Not taking on those extra years of Wiggins without some legit incentive.

Ayton isnt a winner but he is expiring sooner. Neither Ayton or Wiggins are long-term guys for Portland, so you keep the one that expires sooner.
gswhoops
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 34,573
And1: 6,208
Joined: Apr 27, 2005
   

Re: Warriors, Blazers, Nets 

Post#6 » by gswhoops » Mon Jan 6, 2025 9:23 pm

Zero interest in this from GS. Ayton is not a winning player and the antithesis of what we look for in a center. I'd rather have Looney straight up.
Myth
RealGM
Posts: 11,786
And1: 10,442
Joined: Oct 01, 2008
   

Re: Warriors, Blazers, Nets 

Post#7 » by Myth » Mon Jan 6, 2025 9:33 pm

Portland can't chance that Wiggins picks up his player option for an extra year at $30M without an incentive. None of the players going in or out for Portland factor into the long term equation, so the smaller contract of Ayton is preferred to Wiggins. Also, even though this reduces the log jam at center, it creates a log jam at forward, so it doesn't even really solve anything in terms of roster balance.
OutsidetheNBA
Senior
Posts: 654
And1: 373
Joined: Sep 15, 2020
 

Re: Warriors, Blazers, Nets 

Post#8 » by OutsidetheNBA » Mon Jan 6, 2025 9:47 pm

In theory this is good for Portland because Wiggins is having a great season and on his current contract he's positive value. That said, I wouldn't do it unless Portland had a plan to immediately flip him. I worry about Wiggins' motivation and work ethic on a losing team, and his shooting stats when Curry isn't drawing defensive attention. There's a good chance his value deteriorates very quickly in Portland. I'd rather have an expiring Ayton next season then risk it on Wiggins.

Also can't see the Warriors doing this. Ayton is not the type of Center Kerr has ever wanted and he's expensive. I'd also just rather have Wiggins than Cam Johnson given Wiggins good play this year and his defensive/rebounding ability when he's locked-in.
JRoy
RealGM
Posts: 16,549
And1: 13,909
Joined: Feb 27, 2019
 

Re: Warriors, Blazers, Nets 

Post#9 » by JRoy » Mon Jan 6, 2025 9:47 pm

Ayton is not the type of center anyone wants.
Edrees wrote:
JRoy wrote:Monta Ellis have it all


I was hoping and expecting this to be one of the first replies. You did not disappoint. Jroy have it all.
ecuhus1981
RealGM
Posts: 16,905
And1: 1,572
Joined: Jun 19, 2007
       

Re: Warriors, Blazers, Nets 

Post#10 » by ecuhus1981 » Tue Jan 7, 2025 1:15 am

All 3 decline. BRK doesn't want to receive Kuminga as the main return for Cam Johnson (GSW doesn't want to give him in this exchange, anyway). GSW doesn't want a traditional big like DominAyton. And POR doesn't need Wiggins, they have Deni, Jerami and Toumani.
Some people really have a way with words. Other people... not... have... way.
-- Steve Martin
JKiddy
Starter
Posts: 2,238
And1: 493
Joined: Jul 28, 2002

Re: Warriors, Blazers, Nets 

Post#11 » by JKiddy » Tue Jan 7, 2025 2:46 pm

BK would politely decline as they could get much more on the market and are looking at stacking 1sts in 2026 and 2027 or 2028 for CamJo plus a promising player. This does not fully fit their plans for the future.

Return to Trades and Transactions