Cleveland: Okoro and Thor
OKC: Dieng and Kenrich Williams
Cleveland gets two guys with a bit more size that can split with SF/PF which is more needed
OKC gets an impact defender that is young and locked up who fits in nicely with their team
Cleveland and OKC
Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger
Re: Cleveland and OKC
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,744
- And1: 2,442
- Joined: Dec 22, 2010
Re: Cleveland and OKC
OKC have enough smallish wing size defenders . We should focus on our bigs too.
MoneyTalks41890 wrote:No I’m myopic and shortsighted and I want my pile of draft picks.
meekrab wrote:Nothing Jerry Rein$dorf loves more than a visit from Cash Considerations.
Re: Cleveland and OKC
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 58,806
- And1: 35,891
- Joined: Dec 22, 2010
-
Re: Cleveland and OKC
I think Okoro has more value than Dieng at this point, but no team needs Dort, Caruso, and Okoro.
From the Cavs perspective Dieng is very unlikely to be able to stay on the floor this post season. Okoro can. Also, Dieng only has one more year only his rookie contract, so even if he made a leap next season, we couldn't afford to retain him.
From the Cavs perspective Dieng is very unlikely to be able to stay on the floor this post season. Okoro can. Also, Dieng only has one more year only his rookie contract, so even if he made a leap next season, we couldn't afford to retain him.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Return to Trades and Transactions