Pistons/Pelicans Spring Rental

Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger

bkohler
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,582
And1: 757
Joined: Jan 12, 2018
 

Re: Pistons/Pelicans Spring Rental 

Post#21 » by bkohler » Thu Jan 16, 2025 1:42 pm

NYG wrote:I like it, but that just makes me wonder who is available that is worth a 1st?


Very few, but also definitely not very expensive 4 month rentals. Ingram’s told certain teams he’s not going to sign with them which really kills his trade value.
louc1970
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,499
And1: 477
Joined: Feb 16, 2016

Re: Pistons/Pelicans Spring Rental 

Post#22 » by louc1970 » Thu Jan 16, 2025 1:55 pm

SkyHook wrote:
YayBasketball wrote:Yea this is as good a deal as Pels fans can realistically expect now. My question is this, though:

Rich Paul is Ingram's new agent and also Dejounte Murray's, who they just invested in and is now their culture leader. Will the agent accept for a team to take him on as just a rental? Or will they secure an unofficially official commitment on the new contract before the deadline trade.

I guess in this situation BI would be heavily featured as a 1B option on a playoff bound team. So that could be a good opportunity to showcase for his offseason contract negotiations, rather than be a 3rd or 4th option on a stacked team like the Cavs.


I don't see Rich Paul having any influence over whether this particular trade takes place. Detroit can try out Ingram for half a season and make a decision about whether to offer him a new contract in the summer. Ingram can negotiate with any team.

But how many teams are going to have the space Ingram is looking for? And of those, how many are going to be willing to pay it?
oldncreaky
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 7,007
And1: 8,495
Joined: Feb 29, 2004
Location: A retirement village near you
   

Re: Pistons/Pelicans Spring Rental 

Post#23 » by oldncreaky » Thu Jan 16, 2025 3:26 pm

tmorgan wrote:
Texas Chuck wrote:
MotownMadness wrote:I don’t know how to feel about committing to him even after getting him at this price


Yeah the whole point is they don't commit now. They just bring him in to replace the offense lost with Ivey. If the fit is good, you talk new contract. If the fit is bad or his demands are too high you haven't given up any assets you really regret. And if it helps ensure Cade and other young core guys get a taste of the playoffs I think the 2nds are worth it.

No commitment required beyond this year.


But that’s the problem, Chuck. We aren’t replacing the offense lost with Ivey, because Tek and Timmy play 46 minutes and average
Over 17 points themselves. We’re just creating different holes here.


I'm on the fence on this one. Our depth is shaky, and with Ivey out it, we have 8, maybe 9 playable guys -- meaning basically zero margin for injuries after a 2-for-1

It could be made better if we use some of our cap space to get a couple of decent backups, particularly at PG, before this trade is made
In a no-win argument, the first poster to Let It Go will at least retain some peace of mind
Godaddycurse
RealGM
Posts: 21,945
And1: 13,879
Joined: Nov 13, 2019
 

Re: Pistons/Pelicans Spring Rental 

Post#24 » by Godaddycurse » Thu Jan 16, 2025 3:36 pm

oldncreaky wrote:
It could be made better if we use some of our cap space to get a couple of decent backups, particularly at PG, before this trade is made


then OP wouldn't be legal
NYG
RealGM
Posts: 14,986
And1: 2,983
Joined: Aug 09, 2017

Re: Pistons/Pelicans Spring Rental 

Post#25 » by NYG » Thu Jan 16, 2025 3:40 pm

bkohler wrote:
NYG wrote:I like it, but that just makes me wonder who is available that is worth a 1st?


Very few, but also definitely not very expensive 4 month rentals. Ingram’s told certain teams he’s not going to sign with them which really kills his trade value.


Just Butler and Cam of the rumored names, right?
User avatar
Texas Chuck
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 92,375
And1: 98,223
Joined: May 19, 2012
Location: Purgatory
   

Re: Pistons/Pelicans Spring Rental 

Post#26 » by Texas Chuck » Thu Jan 16, 2025 3:50 pm

I didn't have THJ and Fontecchio more helpful offensively than Ingram and definitely don't think adding up PPG is really all that meaningful. But sounds like this is a bust from the Detroit end. On to the next idea. Appreciate all the feedback as always.
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
oldncreaky
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 7,007
And1: 8,495
Joined: Feb 29, 2004
Location: A retirement village near you
   

Re: Pistons/Pelicans Spring Rental 

Post#27 » by oldncreaky » Thu Jan 16, 2025 4:07 pm

Texas Chuck wrote:I didn't have THJ and Fontecchio more helpful offensively than Ingram and definitely don't think adding up PPG is really all that meaningful. But sounds like this is a bust from the Detroit end. On to the next idea. Appreciate all the feedback as always.


I don't think it's anywhere near a bust, just that DET fans are leery of messing with the team given that we are over .500 for the first time in what seems like forever. As I said, I'm on the fence.

Pros:
- significant talent upgrade
- bird rights of value even if we don't retain Ingram

Cons:
- fit: what is working in DET is a heliocentric system around Cade, and I have no idea how Ingram would fit into that when he is gunning for a contract, while THJ and Tec fit well
- depth
- chemistry

I'd feel a lot better if
1) we obtained a backup PG somehow (before or as part of this trade) using cap space or room exception
and
2) it was Harris as part of the outgoing to get to Ingram's salary number (but then Harris is less desirable, and the valuation is probably off)
In a no-win argument, the first poster to Let It Go will at least retain some peace of mind
User avatar
Texas Chuck
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 92,375
And1: 98,223
Joined: May 19, 2012
Location: Purgatory
   

Re: Pistons/Pelicans Spring Rental 

Post#28 » by Texas Chuck » Thu Jan 16, 2025 4:11 pm

oldncreaky wrote:just that DET fans are leery of messing with the team given that we are over .500 for the first time in what seems like forever.


Oh no question. I don't disagree with that concern.

The only thing that surprises me and I disagree with is that he's not an offensive upgrade over the guys going out. I think he absolutely is.
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
BlazersBroncos
RealGM
Posts: 12,344
And1: 9,889
Joined: Oct 27, 2016

Re: Pistons/Pelicans Spring Rental 

Post#29 » by BlazersBroncos » Thu Jan 16, 2025 4:14 pm

As a DET fan said they may have interest in Simons - would this work?

Simons for THJ + TOR 25 SRP + DET 27 SRP + MIL 29 SRP?
Billl
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,210
And1: 3,346
Joined: Sep 06, 2013

Re: Pistons/Pelicans Spring Rental 

Post#30 » by Billl » Thu Jan 16, 2025 4:39 pm

Texas Chuck wrote:
oldncreaky wrote:just that DET fans are leery of messing with the team given that we are over .500 for the first time in what seems like forever.


Oh no question. I don't disagree with that concern.

The only thing that surprises me and I disagree with is that he's not an offensive upgrade over the guys going out. I think he absolutely is.


I mean, if he buys in and is willing to be floor spacer and secondary handler , sure. That's kinda been the knock on pairing him with Zion though. He wants a lot of midrange touches and doesn't appear to be super happy playing off the ball and having most of his action be open jumpers or attacking closeouts. Ingram's 3 attempts are up this year, but the last couple he's been down near that 3 attempt per game mark. THJ and Simone are taking 10 3's a game for us. Even if BI is a better offensive player in a vacuum, that doesn't mean the pistons offense is going to run better overall.
User avatar
Euphonetiks
Pro Prospect
Posts: 953
And1: 462
Joined: Dec 16, 2015
   

Re: Pistons/Pelicans Spring Rental 

Post#31 » by Euphonetiks » Thu Jan 16, 2025 5:07 pm

Billl wrote:
Texas Chuck wrote:
oldncreaky wrote:just that DET fans are leery of messing with the team given that we are over .500 for the first time in what seems like forever.


Oh no question. I don't disagree with that concern.

The only thing that surprises me and I disagree with is that he's not an offensive upgrade over the guys going out. I think he absolutely is.


I mean, if he buys in and is willing to be floor spacer and secondary handler , sure. That's kinda been the knock on pairing him with Zion though. He wants a lot of midrange touches and doesn't appear to be super happy playing off the ball and having most of his action be open jumpers or attacking closeouts. Ingram's 3 attempts are up this year, but the last couple he's been down near that 3 attempt per game mark. THJ and Simone are taking 10 3's a game for us. Even if BI is a better offensive player in a vacuum, that doesn't mean the pistons offense is going to run better overall.


BI and Zion have not meshed because Zion cannot shoot and is not a real PG, while Ingram prefers to play slower and does not have a quick first step. Neither are great defenders, but they can be neutral when not having to carry an entire offensive load. Also Willie Green is not the right coach for them.

The Zion/Ingram pairing coached by Willie Green results in a lot of taking turns: "you get yours and then I will get mine". It is not cohesive. When Zion initiates, BI is usually positioned on the left wing spotting up, but when Zion drives he kicks to the right wing (CJ/Trey) or the corners (Jose/Herb/JRE). Usually the only time he passes back behind himself to Ingram is when he gets walled off and the clock is running down. When Ingram initiates Zion is on the wing and his defender is clogging the lane.

Ingram has hinted multiple times that he thinks he plays better with a point guard. Ingram attempted 6.2 (39%) and 6.1 (38%) 3PA per game playing with Lonzo and was up to 6.4 (37.5%) this season. He also had his best efficiency those two years. I don't think Ingram would have a problem playing off Cade.
bkohler
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,582
And1: 757
Joined: Jan 12, 2018
 

Re: Pistons/Pelicans Spring Rental 

Post#32 » by bkohler » Thu Jan 16, 2025 10:47 pm

NYG wrote:
bkohler wrote:
NYG wrote:I like it, but that just makes me wonder who is available that is worth a 1st?


Very few, but also definitely not very expensive 4 month rentals. Ingram’s told certain teams he’s not going to sign with them which really kills his trade value.


Just Butler and Cam of the rumored names, right?


I'm not sure about Butler, honestly. His contract desires, current contract, age and history of pushing his way out of environments deflates his value to me.
NYG
RealGM
Posts: 14,986
And1: 2,983
Joined: Aug 09, 2017

Re: Pistons/Pelicans Spring Rental 

Post#33 » by NYG » Thu Jan 16, 2025 11:10 pm

I wonder if Memphis would pay a price like this and just risk Ingram bolting via free agency
jayjaysee
King of the Trade Board
Posts: 20,831
And1: 7,801
Joined: Aug 05, 2012

Re: Pistons/Pelicans Spring Rental 

Post#34 » by jayjaysee » Thu Jan 16, 2025 11:12 pm

I would wonder about a Jose for Sasser swap added here for the backup PG needs
Kalamazoo317
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,323
And1: 2,289
Joined: Nov 23, 2018
   

Re: Pistons/Pelicans Spring Rental 

Post#35 » by Kalamazoo317 » Fri Jan 17, 2025 2:20 pm

BlazersBroncos wrote:As a DET fan said they may have interest in Simons - would this work?

Simons for THJ + TOR 25 SRP + DET 27 SRP + MIL 29 SRP?


If you swapped out THJ for Fontecchio, I'd do it
User avatar
Snakebites
Forum Mod - Pistons
Forum Mod - Pistons
Posts: 50,907
And1: 18,048
Joined: Jul 14, 2002
Location: Looking not-so-happily deranged
   

Re: Pistons/Pelicans Spring Rental 

Post#36 » by Snakebites » Fri Jan 17, 2025 3:18 pm

I feel extremely iffy about it.

Which probably means it’s a fair deal.
BlazersBroncos
RealGM
Posts: 12,344
And1: 9,889
Joined: Oct 27, 2016

Re: Pistons/Pelicans Spring Rental 

Post#37 » by BlazersBroncos » Fri Jan 17, 2025 3:52 pm

Kalamazoo317 wrote:
BlazersBroncos wrote:As a DET fan said they may have interest in Simons - would this work?

Simons for THJ + TOR 25 SRP + DET 27 SRP + MIL 29 SRP?


If you swapped out THJ for Fontecchio, I'd do it


I guess that does work w/ the DET cap space. I would 10000% do that.
User avatar
Euphonetiks
Pro Prospect
Posts: 953
And1: 462
Joined: Dec 16, 2015
   

Re: Pistons/Pelicans Spring Rental 

Post#38 » by Euphonetiks » Fri Jan 17, 2025 4:27 pm

I think this trade makes sense if no team makes a desperate offer for an Ingram rental. However, I think adding a 3rd team allowing the Pelicans to sell the extra cap space makes the trade work.

Without Ingram, the Pelicans are ~$30M below the tax next season with 10 players under contract and no big extensions on the horizon. They can afford to take back salary from a 2nd apron or repeater team even if it means taking back money on the books next year.

Jose is a fan favorite and loved by the organizaation for his energy and locker room presence, but he is also very close with Ingram and only under contract for one more season ($4.5M). I think the Pels should be open to a swap for Sasser as someone else suggested to maximize the amount of space they can sell. The bones of the trade before adding the 3rd team would be:

Pels In: Sasser, Fontecchio, THJ
Pels Out: Jose, Ingram, Green

Pistons In: Ingram, Jose, Green
Pistons Out: Sasser, Fontecchio, THJ

After the Pels duck the tax ($850k over) with this trade, they are left with ~$12.5M in tax space to sell. They could use that to simply take on bad salary and acquire assets or to open up a lot more opportunities for extracting value from a CJ trade. If the Pistsons wanted CJ instead, the same trade could be made, but the Pels would end up with ~$9.7M in space to sell instead.

What would GSW, LAC, or DAL give up to duck the tax and add Fontecchio or THJ or Jordan Hawkins? What would LAL, DEN, MIN, PHX, BOS, MIL, NYK, MIA or PHI offer to cut their tax burden and make a slight role player upgrade?
User avatar
A_dub06
Starter
Posts: 2,071
And1: 967
Joined: Dec 02, 2013
 

Re: Pistons/Pelicans Spring Rental 

Post#39 » by A_dub06 » Fri Jan 17, 2025 4:49 pm

I’m in the camp of not wanting anything to do with BI. I don’t see the point in signing him this year, giving up the little amount of assets we have simply to make a push. I do think this is much closer to what he would get traded for, I just don’t see the point in making this trade as I don’t think a trial period is necessary.
They_Them_Hatin
Starter
Posts: 2,052
And1: 739
Joined: Nov 05, 2012

Re: Pistons/Pelicans Spring Rental 

Post#40 » by They_Them_Hatin » Fri Jan 17, 2025 8:49 pm

I would decline if I were the Pistons. Cheap isn’t always right. Just ask the Suns. Ingram is the most overrated player in the league to me (next to Beal) and won’t fit right with Cade and mess up what they have going.

Return to Trades and Transactions