Post#38 » by Euphonetiks » Fri Jan 17, 2025 4:27 pm
I think this trade makes sense if no team makes a desperate offer for an Ingram rental. However, I think adding a 3rd team allowing the Pelicans to sell the extra cap space makes the trade work.
Without Ingram, the Pelicans are ~$30M below the tax next season with 10 players under contract and no big extensions on the horizon. They can afford to take back salary from a 2nd apron or repeater team even if it means taking back money on the books next year.
Jose is a fan favorite and loved by the organizaation for his energy and locker room presence, but he is also very close with Ingram and only under contract for one more season ($4.5M). I think the Pels should be open to a swap for Sasser as someone else suggested to maximize the amount of space they can sell. The bones of the trade before adding the 3rd team would be:
Pels In: Sasser, Fontecchio, THJ
Pels Out: Jose, Ingram, Green
Pistons In: Ingram, Jose, Green
Pistons Out: Sasser, Fontecchio, THJ
After the Pels duck the tax ($850k over) with this trade, they are left with ~$12.5M in tax space to sell. They could use that to simply take on bad salary and acquire assets or to open up a lot more opportunities for extracting value from a CJ trade. If the Pistsons wanted CJ instead, the same trade could be made, but the Pels would end up with ~$9.7M in space to sell instead.
What would GSW, LAC, or DAL give up to duck the tax and add Fontecchio or THJ or Jordan Hawkins? What would LAL, DEN, MIN, PHX, BOS, MIL, NYK, MIA or PHI offer to cut their tax burden and make a slight role player upgrade?