Kyle Kuzma

Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger

Ell Curry
Head Coach
Posts: 7,457
And1: 2,076
Joined: Oct 27, 2001
Location: Newfoundland

Re: Kyle Kuzma 

Post#41 » by Ell Curry » Tue Jan 14, 2025 4:47 am

(Picks need to be added. Knicks give up for sure. I think Wizards come out ahead too (Brogdon and Kuzma no real market, maybe you get a 2nd or 2 at most, this saves them 20M after next year's final hard "let's win 15 games" tank of a season), so I guess the Wiz and Knicks sending stuff to Minny, can debate what).

Wizards: Randle + Conley + Precious
Minnesota: Kuzma + Brogdon + Washington + NYK picks
Knicks: Nickeil Alexander-Walker


Minnesota seems to be going nowhere, and they might lose NAW this summer. This way they get a first probably save some money next year (re-sign Brogdon or tax MLE a Conley replacement, still cheaper than Randle + Conley) they can use on Naz Reid:

Gobert-Miller
NazReid-Kuzma-Miller
McDaniels-Minott
Edwards-DDV
Brogdon-Dillingham

and they get some draft equity, maybe they can move that and Kuzma for a backup 5 or a starting PG, whichever they can't add otherwise, or just draft a Gobert backup they need today (so he doesn't age too fast) and replacement they'll need soon enough in any case.

Wizards tank again next year obviously, and this saves them 20M in 2026-27 when they might want to actually spend some money after adding 2 more top 5 picks to their young "core" of Sarr, Coulibaly, Carrington and Kispert. Maybe Randle can do some stuff and be moved at the next deadline for an expiring.

Knicks get a nice wing for the playoffs, maybe they can re-sign him if their ownership will pay. He's an upgrade at 6th man.
Where's the D?
User avatar
gambitx777
RealGM
Posts: 10,533
And1: 1,983
Joined: Dec 18, 2012

Re: Kyle Kuzma 

Post#42 » by gambitx777 » Tue Jan 14, 2025 10:31 am

I would say a couple teams could use him.
LAC, Sac, suns , Bucks, pistons bulls.

Some of those teams would have a hard time trading for him.

Suns and Bucks would have a hard time trading for him. But could use him.

Sac, Bulls and pistons are in the play in hunt so it would be a flip if they really wanna make trades to further that goal.

LAC had at least a shot in the play offs and have the contracts to make that trade.

Sent from my SM-S926U1 using RealGM mobile app
winforlose
RealGM
Posts: 13,057
And1: 5,694
Joined: Feb 27, 2020

Re: Kyle Kuzma 

Post#43 » by winforlose » Tue Jan 14, 2025 11:27 am

Ell Curry wrote:(Picks need to be added. Knicks give up for sure. I think Wizards come out ahead too (Brogdon and Kuzma no real market, maybe you get a 2nd or 2 at most, this saves them 20M after next year's final hard "let's win 15 games" tank of a season), so I guess the Wiz and Knicks sending stuff to Minny, can debate what).

Wizards: Randle + Conley + Precious
Minnesota: Kuzma + Brogdon + Washington + NYK picks
Knicks: Nickeil Alexander-Walker


Minnesota seems to be going nowhere, and they might lose NAW this summer. This way they get a first probably save some money next year (re-sign Brogdon or tax MLE a Conley replacement, still cheaper than Randle + Conley) they can use on Naz Reid:

Gobert-Miller
NazReid-Kuzma-Miller
McDaniels-Minott
Edwards-DDV
Brogdon-Dillingham

and they get some draft equity, maybe they can move that and Kuzma for a backup 5 or a starting PG, whichever they can't add otherwise, or just draft a Gobert backup they need today (so he doesn't age too fast) and replacement they'll need soon enough in any case.

Wizards tank again next year obviously, and this saves them 20M in 2026-27 when they might want to actually spend some money after adding 2 more top 5 picks to their young "core" of Sarr, Coulibaly, Carrington and Kispert. Maybe Randle can do some stuff and be moved at the next deadline for an expiring.

Knicks get a nice wing for the playoffs, maybe they can re-sign him if their ownership will pay. He's an upgrade at 6th man.


Let’s clean up two misconceptions for the Wolves moving forward.

1. The Wolves are not looking to add long term salary. To resign Naz and NAW they want Randle to opt out. If they take back a deal it would be a starting PG or a discount backup C. 2-4 we are stacked with young guys and Kuzma would be the very last player we add.

2. Mike Conley took a paycut to stay in Minnesota based on a promise he would not be traded. He does not want to move his kids and he doesn’t want to live away from them. We have promised Mike that he can retire a Wolf and I don’t see management breaking that promise. I also think that reputation for keeping promises is why Rudy and Naz both took discounts to stay and Naz will likely again with the promise to start over Randle after the trade deadline.

So to summarize, no money over 15 million except for a starting PG and no Mike Conley trades.
User avatar
Scoot McGroot
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 44,767
And1: 14,029
Joined: Feb 16, 2005
     

Re: Kyle Kuzma 

Post#44 » by Scoot McGroot » Tue Jan 14, 2025 12:59 pm

Ell Curry wrote:(Picks need to be added. Knicks give up for sure. I think Wizards come out ahead too (Brogdon and Kuzma no real market, maybe you get a 2nd or 2 at most, this saves them 20M after next year's final hard "let's win 15 games" tank of a season), so I guess the Wiz and Knicks sending stuff to Minny, can debate what).

Wizards: Randle + Conley + Precious
Minnesota: Kuzma + Brogdon + Washington + NYK picks
Knicks: Nickeil Alexander-Walker




As a 2nd apron team, Minnesota can't aggregate, like they do here.
HartfordWhalers
Senior Mod - 76ers and NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - 76ers and NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 47,322
And1: 20,917
Joined: Apr 07, 2010
 

Re: Kyle Kuzma 

Post#45 » by HartfordWhalers » Tue Jan 14, 2025 2:23 pm

Scoot McGroot wrote:
jayjaysee wrote:The trade kicker is prorated right? So at this point kts likely only 8~ million spread over the three years? and Washington pay it?

Don’t think that’s much of a factor.
.



It’s only be paid out on what he’s remaining to be paid. And it would increase his cap number on the books for cap/tax/apron calculations, too. Washington would pay the cash kicker, but any receiving team would have to account for the increase on their books.


Also worth remembering those unlikley incentives based on team performance. I didn't do a dig on what exactly they are, but team if based on team record it is very possible that they would become likely and add an extra 3m a year cap hit to a playoff team trading for him. (And a team like Chicago wouldn't have that issue based off not being a playoff team last year.)
penbeast0
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Posts: 30,308
And1: 9,869
Joined: Aug 14, 2004
Location: South Florida
 

Re: Kyle Kuzma 

Post#46 » by penbeast0 » Tue Jan 14, 2025 8:09 pm

bgrep14 wrote:Butler and Richardson for Kuzma, Brogdon, and Davis



Why on the sweet earth would the Wizards want malcontent Butler on their roster? We are trying to collect young talent and build a culture. Butler is as win now a player as anyone in the league.
“Most people use statistics like a drunk man uses a lamppost; more for support than illumination,” Andrew Lang.
basketballwacko2
RealGM
Posts: 22,030
And1: 4,338
Joined: May 11, 2002
Location: Just outside of No where.
     

Re: Kyle Kuzma 

Post#47 » by basketballwacko2 » Wed Jan 15, 2025 5:06 am

winforlose wrote:
LightTheBeam wrote:
winforlose wrote:
Turn next years expiring into a bad money deal with an extra year. Pay 2nds to do it, plus raise the payroll even further with replacement minimum for JHS (I believe the Lakers have 15 players at present, minimum is 14.) Do you really think Kuzma is that much better than Rui to make it worth it?

https://www.spotrac.com/nba/player/_/id/31566/rui-hachimura


Personally? No. But i do think the Lakers have limited options and may make a deal to try and bolster the roster somewhat. Kuzma was part of the original championship squad.

They are tied to AD/Lebron until lebron calls it quits.


I agree the Lakers may try to make a deal. But this deal has them as bad or worse with less assets and more bad money. I think the move is out there, this is just not it.


I don't think it's terrible for a team like LAL who doesn't mind paying tax, unless you think JHS is gonna become a really good player. A 2nd and parts for Kuzma isn't terrible and his contract is declining. Kuzma is not a great player and certainly not much of a defender. So this is not great the question is does Kuzma help the lakers more than the other guys?
basketballwacko2
RealGM
Posts: 22,030
And1: 4,338
Joined: May 11, 2002
Location: Just outside of No where.
     

Re: Kyle Kuzma 

Post#48 » by basketballwacko2 » Wed Jan 15, 2025 5:07 am

I remember last season the Wiz thinking they were gonna get 2 #1's for Kuzma.
User avatar
gambitx777
RealGM
Posts: 10,533
And1: 1,983
Joined: Dec 18, 2012

Re: Kyle Kuzma 

Post#49 » by gambitx777 » Wed Jan 15, 2025 10:11 am

basketballwacko2 wrote:I remember last season the Wiz thinking they were gonna get 2 #1's for Kuzma.
Well they were offered two protected firsts for him and turned it down at kuzmas request. They had a hand shake deal with him and they honored it. Kuzma burned them pretty bad.

Sent from my SM-S926U1 using RealGM mobile app
basketballwacko2
RealGM
Posts: 22,030
And1: 4,338
Joined: May 11, 2002
Location: Just outside of No where.
     

Re: Kyle Kuzma 

Post#50 » by basketballwacko2 » Fri Jan 17, 2025 8:07 pm

gambitx777 wrote:
basketballwacko2 wrote:I remember last season the Wiz thinking they were gonna get 2 #1's for Kuzma.
Well they were offered two protected firsts for him and turned it down at kuzmas request. They had a hand shake deal with him and they honored it. Kuzma burned them pretty bad.

Sent from my SM-S926U1 using RealGM mobile app


They should have took that and said, "Sorry buddy but this is business."
basketballwacko2
RealGM
Posts: 22,030
And1: 4,338
Joined: May 11, 2002
Location: Just outside of No where.
     

Re: Kyle Kuzma 

Post#51 » by basketballwacko2 » Fri Jan 17, 2025 8:09 pm

penbeast0 wrote:
bgrep14 wrote:Butler and Richardson for Kuzma, Brogdon, and Davis



Why on the sweet earth would the Wizards want malcontent Butler on their roster? We are trying to collect young talent and build a culture. Butler is as win now a player as anyone in the league.


I agree with you Butler is a very good player still but he's burning his bridges everywhere he goes it seems. Bulls, Wolves, Sixers, now the Heat. Where does he want to be an what is it he really wants?
esvl
Starter
Posts: 2,219
And1: 639
Joined: Jun 02, 2022
     

Re: Kyle Kuzma 

Post#52 » by esvl » Fri Jan 17, 2025 9:28 pm

Nobody really wants Kuzma. Let’s accept this dire fact.
User avatar
Texas Chuck
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 92,375
And1: 98,223
Joined: May 19, 2012
Location: Purgatory
   

Re: Kyle Kuzma 

Post#53 » by Texas Chuck » Fri Jan 17, 2025 10:41 pm

gambitx777 wrote:
basketballwacko2 wrote:I remember last season the Wiz thinking they were gonna get 2 #1's for Kuzma.
Well they were offered two protected firsts for him and turned it down at kuzmas request. They had a hand shake deal with him and they honored it. Kuzma burned them pretty bad.

Sent from my SM-S926U1 using RealGM mobile app


Who offered this? I know Dallas and Washington had a deal worked out that Kuzma turned down, but I don't recall ever hearing what the Dallas offer was and I'd be shocked if it was 2 firsts considering how little Dallas had to work with. Was there another deal agreed to that Kuzma also turned down or do you have a source on Dallas offering that that I missed maybe?
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
Lucky Once
Freshman
Posts: 99
And1: 84
Joined: Feb 02, 2023
 

Re: Kyle Kuzma 

Post#54 » by Lucky Once » Fri Jan 17, 2025 11:36 pm

Texas Chuck wrote:
gambitx777 wrote:
basketballwacko2 wrote:I remember last season the Wiz thinking they were gonna get 2 #1's for Kuzma.
Well they were offered two protected firsts for him and turned it down at kuzmas request. They had a hand shake deal with him and they honored it. Kuzma burned them pretty bad.

Sent from my SM-S926U1 using RealGM mobile app


Who offered this? I know Dallas and Washington had a deal worked out that Kuzma turned down, but I don't recall ever hearing what the Dallas offer was and I'd be shocked if it was 2 firsts considering how little Dallas had to work with. Was there another deal agreed to that Kuzma also turned down or do you have a source on Dallas offering that that I missed maybe?


I don't believe there was ever reporting on what Dallas offered, just that Washington ran the possibility by Kuzma and he declined so they pivoted to Gafford and PJ Washington. I don't think we can just assume that they would have acquired the pick they used for Washington and sent both for Kuzma.
User avatar
Texas Chuck
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 92,375
And1: 98,223
Joined: May 19, 2012
Location: Purgatory
   

Re: Kyle Kuzma 

Post#55 » by Texas Chuck » Sat Jan 18, 2025 12:05 am

Lucky Once wrote:
Texas Chuck wrote:
gambitx777 wrote:Well they were offered two protected firsts for him and turned it down at kuzmas request. They had a hand shake deal with him and they honored it. Kuzma burned them pretty bad.

Sent from my SM-S926U1 using RealGM mobile app


Who offered this? I know Dallas and Washington had a deal worked out that Kuzma turned down, but I don't recall ever hearing what the Dallas offer was and I'd be shocked if it was 2 firsts considering how little Dallas had to work with. Was there another deal agreed to that Kuzma also turned down or do you have a source on Dallas offering that that I missed maybe?


I don't believe there was ever reporting on what Dallas offered, just that Washington ran the possibility by Kuzma and he declined so they pivoted to Gafford and PJ Washington. I don't think we can just assume that they would have acquired the pick they used for Washington and sent both for Kuzma.


Yeah I don't think we can assume that either, but thought maybe gambit had seen something I never did? Will be interesting to see if they come back with a source to back up that claim. I know we got leaks out of Washington prior to the deadline of them asking for that, but I don't think anyone seriously thought they were getting that.
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
OGSactownballer
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,687
And1: 1,363
Joined: Oct 02, 2005

Re: Kyle Kuzma 

Post#56 » by OGSactownballer » Sat Jan 18, 2025 12:26 am

Kings out - Huerter, Len, McDermott, McLaughlin, Colby Jones (youth value) a lotto protected ‘28 first that devolves to two seconds if not conveyed.

Wizards out - Kuzma, Val

More contracts can be added if needed and obviously the Wiz buy out/cut most of those vets and keep Huerter as a prospect and next year expiring and Jones.

Return to Trades and Transactions