zimpy27 wrote:Wizop wrote:zimpy27 wrote:But objectively I do think it makes sense as I think Murray is a 3 being used as a 4 and Jarace is a 4 being used as a 3.
If you want a 4, make an offer for Obi.
Sac need a defender next to Sabonis
Nesmith?
Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger
zimpy27 wrote:Wizop wrote:zimpy27 wrote:But objectively I do think it makes sense as I think Murray is a 3 being used as a 4 and Jarace is a 4 being used as a 3.
If you want a 4, make an offer for Obi.
Sac need a defender next to Sabonis
Wizop wrote:zimpy27 wrote:Wizop wrote:
If you want a 4, make an offer for Obi.
Sac need a defender next to Sabonis
Nesmith?
bpcox05 wrote:Wizop wrote:zimpy27 wrote:
Sac need a defender next to Sabonis
Nesmith?
Nesmith is more of a SF/SG, right?
Sabonis has below average length at the C spot so we ideally want a PF who has above average size, length, and athleticism at PF to help make up for that. I don’t think Nesmith at PF fits that description.
bpcox05 wrote:Wizop wrote:zimpy27 wrote:
Sac need a defender next to Sabonis
Nesmith?
Nesmith is more of a SF/SG, right?
Sabonis has below average length at the C spot so we ideally want a PF who has above average size, length, and athleticism at PF to help make up for that. I don’t think Nesmith at PF fits that description.
Wizop wrote:bpcox05 wrote:Wizop wrote:
Nesmith?
Nesmith is more of a SF/SG, right?
Sabonis has below average length at the C spot so we ideally want a PF who has above average size, length, and athleticism at PF to help make up for that. I don’t think Nesmith at PF fits that description.
Agree. Aaron is a good defender at SF. Murray would be your PF.
zimpy27 wrote:I mean everyone thinks their rookie contract player is about to breakout. I guess I should have expected most to dislike the trade.
But objectively I do think it makes sense as I think Murray is a 3 being used as a 4 and Jarace is a 4 being used as a 3.
Both seem as talented as each other and these 2 teams have a history of trading.
Scoot McGroot wrote:zimpy27 wrote:I mean everyone thinks their rookie contract player is about to breakout. I guess I should have expected most to dislike the trade.
But objectively I do think it makes sense as I think Murray is a 3 being used as a 4 and Jarace is a 4 being used as a 3.
Both seem as talented as each other and these 2 teams have a history of trading.
It would be most difficult for Indy to have Mathurin and Murray to hit free agency the same year after Haliburton and Siakam maxed, and Myles hopefully re signed.
zimpy27 wrote:
Good point. The Siakam max deal is a bit of a problem. Any chance Indy moves him?
zimpy27 wrote:Scoot McGroot wrote:zimpy27 wrote:I mean everyone thinks their rookie contract player is about to breakout. I guess I should have expected most to dislike the trade.
But objectively I do think it makes sense as I think Murray is a 3 being used as a 4 and Jarace is a 4 being used as a 3.
Both seem as talented as each other and these 2 teams have a history of trading.
It would be most difficult for Indy to have Mathurin and Murray to hit free agency the same year after Haliburton and Siakam maxed, and Myles hopefully re signed.
Good point. The Siakam max deal is a bit of a problem. Any chance Indy moves him?
Return to Trades and Transactions