That Chicago/Phoenix deal if there’s no Beal deal
Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger
Re: That Chicago/Phoenix deal if there’s no Beal deal
-
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 824
- And1: 563
- Joined: May 22, 2017
-
Re: That Chicago/Phoenix deal if there’s no Beal deal
I would not recommend any team trading for Patrick Williams if you expect him to actually contribute to winning
Re: That Chicago/Phoenix deal if there’s no Beal deal
- Mr Puddles
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,331
- And1: 13,892
- Joined: Jan 17, 2015
- Location: Under your bed
-
Re: That Chicago/Phoenix deal if there’s no Beal deal
letsgobulls23 wrote:I would not recommend any team trading for Patrick Williams if you expect him to actually contribute to winning
Actually I think Patrick Williams could do well in Phoenix. His role would be much simpler than in Chicago. If he can play defense, rebound and hit some open shots, he'll fit in well. He'll have a lot more space around him when playing around KD and Booker. This is also why I felt the Nick Rich was an underrated acquisition, because he fills and need and just needs to play his role.
That being said, I wouldn't give up two first rounders for him.
Re: That Chicago/Phoenix deal if there’s no Beal deal
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,883
- And1: 3,148
- Joined: May 25, 2012
-
Re: That Chicago/Phoenix deal if there’s no Beal deal
Mr Puddles wrote:letsgobulls23 wrote:I would not recommend any team trading for Patrick Williams if you expect him to actually contribute to winning
Actually I think Patrick Williams could do well in Phoenix. His role would be much simpler than in Chicago. If he can play defense, rebound and hit some open shots, he'll fit in well. He'll have a lot more space around him when playing around KD and Booker. This is also why I felt the Nick Rich was an underrated acquisition, because he fills and need and just needs to play his role.
That being said, I wouldn't give up two first rounders for him.
I wouldn’t give up a single first for him. Maybe Nurk and a second but honestly, Nurk expires after next season and is an excellent place holder if the Bulls trade Vuc. The $ saving alone for Chicago should be value enough.
Re: That Chicago/Phoenix deal if there’s no Beal deal
-
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 824
- And1: 563
- Joined: May 22, 2017
-
Re: That Chicago/Phoenix deal if there’s no Beal deal
Mr Puddles wrote:letsgobulls23 wrote:I would not recommend any team trading for Patrick Williams if you expect him to actually contribute to winning
Actually I think Patrick Williams could do well in Phoenix. His role would be much simpler than in Chicago. If he can play defense, rebound and hit some open shots, he'll fit in well. He'll have a lot more space around him when playing around KD and Booker. This is also why I felt the Nick Rich was an underrated acquisition, because he fills and need and just needs to play his role.
That being said, I wouldn't give up two first rounders for him.
He might have better chances to succeed in PHX, but right now he does not play defense, rebound or hit open shots consistently. He's got all the physical tools, but has shown zero signs of improvement since he entered the league. If anything, he's regressed.
Return to Trades and Transactions