oldncreaky wrote:nykballa2k4 wrote:Texas Chuck wrote:Okay this one a miss. Raptors fans still believe in IQ. Others worried about that contract. One of those worth more where he is guys. I think Toronto should get out from under if they can, but accept Raps fans are still in.
On to the next bad idea
Just to throw in my 2 cents: It would be a complete steal for the Lakers. IQ can score 20, hit the 3 with reliability, and plays top shelf defense.
NOT a pure point guard. He is a two way combo guard/shooting guard in a point guard's body.
Raps quietly have a good team, need to get healthy of course and need depth but it will come. I expect a Magic-like rise out of them next year.
Interesting post.
Agree with your read on IQ. I think evaluating a 5-year deal on 9 games and jumping to the conclusion that IQ is a "bad contract" is an extremely lazy take
I also think TOR is better than their record. Now that most of their vets are finally healthy, they're 6-6 in January
On TOR next year, I think a lot of it has to do with how much, if at all, a bunch of young guys progress -- they've played 5 rookies and 4 other guys on rookie deals major minutes. So it's possible, but I think they'd top out at .500 without some significant leaps from 2-3 guys, and leaps are too hard for me to predict.
I have no doubts really in Barnes, IQ, RJ. JP seems to be a coveted big man, though I think -as with any club, a C who can provide spacing with interior presence is important. Grady, I believe, is a relatively springy 3 point weapon. Come February, this will be the first year post OG trade where they will have this core in place. As you say 6-6 since having some guys be healthy (6-6 in Jan) and just glancing at some of the split stats it looks like more efficient offense, less turnovers. Next three games are Pels, Wizards, and Bulls. Could be 9-6 with some luck (if that's what they want) at months end.