[Shams] LAC/UTA Mega* Deal

Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger

User avatar
K_chile22
RealGM
Posts: 16,726
And1: 8,620
Joined: Jul 15, 2015
   

Re: [Shams] LAC/UTA Mega* Deal 

Post#41 » by K_chile22 » Sat Feb 1, 2025 9:19 pm

Think this goes with my prediction that dumping money is going to be dirt cheap this deadline
nykballa2k4
RealGM
Posts: 31,063
And1: 7,434
Joined: Jul 26, 2004
Location: Kurt Rhombus is managing the defense...
       

Re: [Shams] LAC/UTA Mega* Deal 

Post#42 » by nykballa2k4 » Sat Feb 1, 2025 9:24 pm

LightTheBeam wrote:
ejftw wrote:
LightTheBeam wrote:Maybe balmers willingness to spend has seen it's limits?


It's less about limits, and more about the fact the new CBA would have a tight chokehold on the team's chances. Basically, he has no issues with spending, but doesn't mean he spends stupidly.

I have little doubt that with the old CBA, George would have been offered the max.

Thank god that addition by subtraction happened tho


I would have thought the Clippers could have easily used Tucker + Mann and/or Bones + that 2nd and went and got another good player. The players are irrelevant the Clippers ducked the tux here. Maybe it pays off in the buyout market, or maybe Balmer saves a few bucks for a year?

And I do think it was a solid move btw. Just saying, Balmer of the past goes and gets another contributor for a playoff run.

If they just traded a SRP for say Ben Simmons or Brogdon (buyout possibilities) epic win
Numbers don't lie, people who use them do
Stand up to all hate
Stand up to Jewish hate
Godaddycurse
RealGM
Posts: 21,938
And1: 13,870
Joined: Nov 13, 2019
 

Re: [Shams] LAC/UTA Mega* Deal 

Post#43 » by Godaddycurse » Sat Feb 1, 2025 9:33 pm

K_chile22 wrote:Think this goes with my prediction that dumping money is going to be dirt cheap this deadline


Depends on how much cash was sent
chrbal
RealGM
Posts: 21,547
And1: 1,993
Joined: Mar 02, 2001
Contact:

Re: [Shams] LAC/UTA Mega* Deal 

Post#44 » by chrbal » Sat Feb 1, 2025 9:42 pm

K_chile22 wrote:Think this goes with my prediction that dumping money is going to be dirt cheap this deadline


They’re all basically expiring contracts and it’s a prorated amount of $8.6 (?) million. It’ll be interesting to see how much non expirings/cap ducking trades cost
User avatar
Domejandro
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Posts: 20,285
And1: 30,517
Joined: Jul 29, 2014

Re: [Shams] LAC/UTA Mega* Deal 

Post#45 » by Domejandro » Sat Feb 1, 2025 11:13 pm

Karmaloop wrote:
jazzfan1971 wrote:When we signed Eubanks this summer I was, 'WTF'. My only hope was that maybe he would be worth a 2nd down the line.

This Ainge kid.... he knows his stuff.


I mean, saving what $6.6M is worth more than a single SRP in my opinion.

Important note is that because the Los Angeles Clippers have played 48 games, 58.5% of the salary is already paid by the Los Angeles Clippers. Utah will functionally be paying the remainder of the $6.6MM, which grades out to buying the Second Round Draft Pick for just under $2.74MM.

For the Los Angeles Clippers, dropping the $6.6MM is incredibly important for dodging out of the Luxury-Tax, but for Utah, it is not a substantial financial investment at all. It is a pretty standard win-win trade.
HartfordWhalers
Senior Mod - 76ers and NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - 76ers and NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 47,322
And1: 20,917
Joined: Apr 07, 2010
 

Re: [Shams] LAC/UTA Mega* Deal 

Post#46 » by HartfordWhalers » Sun Feb 2, 2025 12:02 am

Domejandro wrote:
Karmaloop wrote:
jazzfan1971 wrote:When we signed Eubanks this summer I was, 'WTF'. My only hope was that maybe he would be worth a 2nd down the line.

This Ainge kid.... he knows his stuff.


I mean, saving what $6.6M is worth more than a single SRP in my opinion.

Important note is that because the Los Angeles Clippers have played 48 games, 58.5% of the salary is already paid by the Los Angeles Clippers. Utah will functionally be paying the remainder of the $6.6MM, which grades out to buying the Second Round Draft Pick for just under $2.74MM.

For the Los Angeles Clippers, dropping the $6.6MM is incredibly important for dodging out of the Luxury-Tax, but for Utah, it is not a substantial financial investment at all. It is a pretty standard win-win trade.


All true, but doesn't really touch on the theoretical, was Eubanks himself positive value? Would LAC prefer if it was the same deal but Eubanks to a third team and the more cap space? (And same for Utah, was getting off Eubanks positive value or negative value?)

Return to Trades and Transactions