Blazers at the Deadline

Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger

kdawg32086
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 10,920
And1: 1,086
Joined: Jun 12, 2004
Location: Clark County, Washington
         

Blazers at the Deadline 

Post#1 » by kdawg32086 » Wed Feb 5, 2025 1:30 am

Trade #1: Portland and Houston
Blazers get: Jeff Green and a 1st round pick (2027 PHX or 2028 HOU?).

Rockets get: Robert WIlliams III

Why?: Portland picks up an asset for Williams, by picking up a first round pick to add to their rebuild and Houston picks up a big man to help them compete for a title.

Trade #2: Portland and Dallas
Blazers get: PJ Washington, Naji Marshall, and Dante Exum

Mavs get: Anfernee Simons and Toumani Camara

Why?: Portland moves Simons to clear room for continuing to develop its young guards while improving its defense, and Dallas balances out their roster by swapping two frontcourt players for a scoring guard and another win defender. Portland waives Exum.

Trade #3: Portland, LA Lakers, and Sacramento
Blazers get: Dalton Knecht, Jarred Vanderbilt, Rui Hachimura, Gabe Vincent, and Christian Wood

Lakers get: Deandre Ayton, Jabari Walker, Ryan Rupert, Doug McDermott, and Alex Len

Kings get: Kris Murray and Duop Reath

Why?: Blazers move Ayton for depth and clear a starting spot for Clingan. Lakers get their center. Kings move some veterans and add a couple of young players to the rotation.

Final Blazers Roster:
PG- Henderson, Banton, Vincent
SG- Sharpe, Knecht, Thybulle
SF- Avdija, Grant, Marshall, Green
PF- Washington, Vanderbilt, Hachimura
C- Clingan, Wood
Image
Thank you triplemke23 for the sig.
ReggiesKnicks
Veteran
Posts: 2,752
And1: 2,271
Joined: Jan 25, 2025
   

Re: Blazers at the Deadline 

Post#2 » by ReggiesKnicks » Wed Feb 5, 2025 1:36 am

Nobody is giving anything close to a real 1st, let alone an unprotected 1st for Robert "25 games per year" Williams.

Houston already has Sengun and Adams this year anyways.
Blazinaway
General Manager
Posts: 8,820
And1: 1,580
Joined: Jan 27, 2009

Re: Blazers at the Deadline 

Post#3 » by Blazinaway » Wed Feb 5, 2025 1:38 am

No go for trade #2, Blazers are not giving up Camara for that, Camara is a keeper and he and Deni play very well together on both sides of the ball
JRoy
RealGM
Posts: 16,544
And1: 13,900
Joined: Feb 27, 2019
 

Re: Blazers at the Deadline 

Post#4 » by JRoy » Wed Feb 5, 2025 1:44 am

I’d go for 1 and pass on the others.
Edrees wrote:
JRoy wrote:Monta Ellis have it all


I was hoping and expecting this to be one of the first replies. You did not disappoint. Jroy have it all.
Skybox
RealGM
Posts: 18,363
And1: 8,424
Joined: Jan 21, 2017
 

Re: Blazers at the Deadline 

Post#5 » by Skybox » Wed Feb 5, 2025 1:48 am

JRoy wrote:I’d go for 1 and pass on the others.


I’d say the frp on #1 would have some heavy protections
JRoy
RealGM
Posts: 16,544
And1: 13,900
Joined: Feb 27, 2019
 

Re: Blazers at the Deadline 

Post#6 » by JRoy » Wed Feb 5, 2025 1:52 am

Or 1-2 SRP back
Edrees wrote:
JRoy wrote:Monta Ellis have it all


I was hoping and expecting this to be one of the first replies. You did not disappoint. Jroy have it all.
OutsidetheNBA
Senior
Posts: 654
And1: 373
Joined: Sep 15, 2020
 

Re: Blazers at the Deadline 

Post#7 » by OutsidetheNBA » Wed Feb 5, 2025 1:55 am

1st trade: Houston has Adams. Not sure they need RWIII and no one is sending an unprotected 1st for RWIII. A "worst of" several 1sts or a couple of 2nds is fairer.

2nd trade: No. Camara is too cheap/young/good for a package of players that don't really help the Blazers. Ant to the Mavs, PJ to a 3rd team, and a pick+expiring to the Blazers is great framework though.

3rd trade: Yes if Vando gets removed from the deal. I don't think he's actually necessary to balance salaries, and his contract is so bad that Blazers need something better than Knecht coming back.
Myth
RealGM
Posts: 11,786
And1: 10,442
Joined: Oct 01, 2008
   

Re: Blazers at the Deadline 

Post#8 » by Myth » Wed Feb 5, 2025 2:08 am

For Portland:
Yes!
NO!
Yes!
User avatar
LarsV8
RealGM
Posts: 10,144
And1: 5,449
Joined: Dec 13, 2009
       

Re: Blazers at the Deadline 

Post#9 » by LarsV8 » Wed Feb 5, 2025 3:00 am

Pass, not trading a first for Timelord.
Image
ThatBoyNick
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,675
And1: 3,628
Joined: Jul 12, 2014
 

Re: Blazers at the Deadline 

Post#10 » by ThatBoyNick » Wed Feb 5, 2025 4:02 am

I think every team except the Blazers and Kings (who get Murray and Reath for McDermott and Len?)
kobe_vs_jordan
RealGM
Posts: 10,656
And1: 5,065
Joined: Jan 07, 2012
Location: Atl
   

Re: Blazers at the Deadline 

Post#11 » by kobe_vs_jordan » Wed Feb 5, 2025 4:04 am

Lakers don't want Ayton> RW3 , sure
jbk1234
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 58,804
And1: 35,888
Joined: Dec 22, 2010
 

Re: Blazers at the Deadline 

Post#12 » by jbk1234 » Wed Feb 5, 2025 4:17 am

All I know is that if the Blazers still have all that salary on the books after the deadline, for the second year in a row during the middle of a rebuild, that's a huge L.

There's an opportunity cost that comes with not being able to sell cap space when you're rebuilding. There's an opportunity cost when it comes to development when you have too many vets playing too many minutes. You pay that cost when the team is playing good basketball and winning. You don't when you're losing anyway.

It's past time for the Blazers to get off some of that money.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
OutsidetheNBA
Senior
Posts: 654
And1: 373
Joined: Sep 15, 2020
 

Re: Blazers at the Deadline 

Post#13 » by OutsidetheNBA » Wed Feb 5, 2025 5:29 am

jbk1234 wrote:All I know is that if the Blazers still have all that salary on the books after the deadline, for the second year in a row during the middle of a rebuild, that's a huge L.

There's an opportunity cost that comes with not being able to sell cap space when you're rebuilding. There's an opportunity cost when it comes to development when you have too many vets playing too many minutes. You pay that cost when the team is playing good basketball and winning. You don't when you're losing anyway.

It's past time for the Blazers to get off some of that money.


You'd think so. But the Blazers are 9-1 in their last 10 and now are as many games back of the play-in (4) as they are ahead of the Nets for the 6th best odds in the lottery.

I think the Blazers have joined the Bulls on the treadmill. I predict they trade no vets other than maybe RWIII who they featured tonight. Hope I'm wrong!
User avatar
Pattycakes
General Manager
Posts: 8,577
And1: 2,179
Joined: Nov 01, 2005
Contact:
     

Re: Blazers at the Deadline 

Post#14 » by Pattycakes » Wed Feb 5, 2025 6:07 am

OutsidetheNBA wrote:
jbk1234 wrote:All I know is that if the Blazers still have all that salary on the books after the deadline, for the second year in a row during the middle of a rebuild, that's a huge L.

There's an opportunity cost that comes with not being able to sell cap space when you're rebuilding. There's an opportunity cost when it comes to development when you have too many vets playing too many minutes. You pay that cost when the team is playing good basketball and winning. You don't when you're losing anyway.

It's past time for the Blazers to get off some of that money.


You'd think so. But the Blazers are 9-1 in their last 10 and now are as many games back of the play-in (4) as they are ahead of the Nets for the 6th best odds in the lottery.

I think the Blazers have joined the Bulls on the treadmill. I predict they trade no vets other than maybe RWIII who they featured tonight. Hope I'm wrong!


The Blazers are the youngest team in the league they ain’t on a treadmill :lol:
Somewhere trying not to offend Texas Chuck.
zzaj
General Manager
Posts: 8,993
And1: 3,567
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
 

Re: Blazers at the Deadline 

Post#15 » by zzaj » Wed Feb 5, 2025 7:48 am

jbk1234 wrote:All I know is that if the Blazers still have all that salary on the books after the deadline, for the second year in a row during the middle of a rebuild, that's a huge L.

There's an opportunity cost that comes with not being able to sell cap space when you're rebuilding. There's an opportunity cost when it comes to development when you have too many vets playing too many minutes. You pay that cost when the team is playing good basketball and winning. You don't when you're losing anyway.

It's past time for the Blazers to get off some of that money.


From your mouth to Cronin’s ears. Please, G-D…
OutsidetheNBA
Senior
Posts: 654
And1: 373
Joined: Sep 15, 2020
 

Re: Blazers at the Deadline 

Post#16 » by OutsidetheNBA » Wed Feb 5, 2025 2:15 pm

Pattycakes wrote:
OutsidetheNBA wrote:
jbk1234 wrote:All I know is that if the Blazers still have all that salary on the books after the deadline, for the second year in a row during the middle of a rebuild, that's a huge L.

There's an opportunity cost that comes with not being able to sell cap space when you're rebuilding. There's an opportunity cost when it comes to development when you have too many vets playing too many minutes. You pay that cost when the team is playing good basketball and winning. You don't when you're losing anyway.

It's past time for the Blazers to get off some of that money.


You'd think so. But the Blazers are 9-1 in their last 10 and now are as many games back of the play-in (4) as they are ahead of the Nets for the 6th best odds in the lottery.

I think the Blazers have joined the Bulls on the treadmill. I predict they trade no vets other than maybe RWIII who they featured tonight. Hope I'm wrong!


The Blazers are the youngest team in the league they ain’t on a treadmill :lol:


I like the young guys! Scoot looks like he'll be the Kyle Lowry of Mike Conleys. Sharpe can become a top-10 SG for a long time. Camara and Deni are already really good wings. Clingan could be a great defensive center.

The one thing this roster is missing, though, is a guy with the potential to be a consistent all-nba teamer. I'm no draft expert, but everyone seems to think there are 3-4 star-potential guys in this draft. Very strange that we're leaning on Ayton, Grant, and Simons to play heavy minutes to try to make the play-in this year when we could pretty easily clear them off of our books and get a few assets back while leaning into developing our young guys and getting better odds at a star.

Return to Trades and Transactions