Shams: DeAndre Hunter to Cavs

Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger

cgf
RealGM
Posts: 35,077
And1: 14,446
Joined: Jul 01, 2008
   

Re: Shams: DeAndre Hunter to Cavs 

Post#41 » by cgf » Fri Feb 7, 2025 3:04 pm

jayjaysee wrote:Everyone talking about Atlanta tanking…

The play-in is gifting them a chance to just need Trae to be special for two games to make the playoffs and convey a pick in the teens… Trae has to be special to get out of play-in whether they do these trades or not.

No one else wants the 10th seed out East. Philly wants in, but Chicago doesn’t want to be in so Atlanta will get in by default IMO.

Feels like very little changed for Atlanta’s current season by the moves they did and they got the team ready for next year.


Yeah. Before JJ went down I thought they had a shot at snagging the 6th seed if Orlando didn't get back on track or Milwaukee started to slip, but without him they were locked into a playoff spot unless Trae went down to. The east has gotten a lot stronger at the top, but the conference isn't as deep as the west, and one of those final two play-in spots is still very achievable for the Hawks even after selling at the deadline to clear capspace for the summer.

Plus those SAS picks are a sunken cost anyway. Atlanta's ability to improve their team is neither helped nor hindered by handing over a lower pick to the spurs.
Capn'O wrote:We're the recovering meth addict older brother. And we've been clean for a few years now, thank you very much. Very uncouth to bring it up.

Brunson: So what are you paid to do?
Hart: Run around like an idiot during the game and f*** s*** up!
jayjaysee
King of the Trade Board
Posts: 20,831
And1: 7,801
Joined: Aug 05, 2012

Re: Shams: DeAndre Hunter to Cavs 

Post#42 » by jayjaysee » Fri Feb 7, 2025 3:10 pm

cgf wrote:
jayjaysee wrote:Everyone talking about Atlanta tanking…

The play-in is gifting them a chance to just need Trae to be special for two games to make the playoffs and convey a pick in the teens… Trae has to be special to get out of play-in whether they do these trades or not.

No one else wants the 10th seed out East. Philly wants in, but Chicago doesn’t want to be in so Atlanta will get in by default IMO.

Feels like very little changed for Atlanta’s current season by the moves they did and they got the team ready for next year.


Yeah. Before JJ went down I thought they had a shot at snagging the 6th seed if Orlando didn't get back on track or Milwaukee started to slip, but without him they were locked into a playoff spot unless Trae went down to. The east has gotten a lot stronger at the top, but the conference isn't as deep as the west, and one of those final two play-in spots is still very achievable for the Hawks even after selling at the deadline to clear capspace for the summer.

Plus those SAS picks are a sunken cost anyway. Atlanta's ability to improve their team is neither helped nor hindered by handing over a lower pick to the spurs.


Yeah, it would have cost a good asset to get out of the play-in and get to six. But it costs nothing to stay ahead of Chicago imo. The benefit of playing in the East and 5 teams behind you tanking..

But Chicago also didn’t really do what I expected, so maybe they still want to fight for 10th seed and their fans were right? I thought Chicago would’ve gotten value for at least 2 more guys on their roster..
cgf
RealGM
Posts: 35,077
And1: 14,446
Joined: Jul 01, 2008
   

Re: Shams: DeAndre Hunter to Cavs 

Post#43 » by cgf » Fri Feb 7, 2025 3:36 pm

jayjaysee wrote:
cgf wrote:
jayjaysee wrote:Everyone talking about Atlanta tanking…

The play-in is gifting them a chance to just need Trae to be special for two games to make the playoffs and convey a pick in the teens… Trae has to be special to get out of play-in whether they do these trades or not.

No one else wants the 10th seed out East. Philly wants in, but Chicago doesn’t want to be in so Atlanta will get in by default IMO.

Feels like very little changed for Atlanta’s current season by the moves they did and they got the team ready for next year.


Yeah. Before JJ went down I thought they had a shot at snagging the 6th seed if Orlando didn't get back on track or Milwaukee started to slip, but without him they were locked into a playoff spot unless Trae went down to. The east has gotten a lot stronger at the top, but the conference isn't as deep as the west, and one of those final two play-in spots is still very achievable for the Hawks even after selling at the deadline to clear capspace for the summer.

Plus those SAS picks are a sunken cost anyway. Atlanta's ability to improve their team is neither helped nor hindered by handing over a lower pick to the spurs.


Yeah, it would have cost a good asset to get out of the play-in and get to six. But it costs nothing to stay ahead of Chicago imo. The benefit of playing in the East and 5 teams behind you tanking..

But Chicago also didn’t really do what I expected, so maybe they still want to fight for 10th seed and their fans were right? I thought Chicago would’ve gotten value for at least 2 more guys on their roster..


Once JJ went down getting top 6 was out of the question IMO. If he had stayed healthy, however, and their FO been able to upgrade from Capela to someone at least as good as Poeltl, then we could be having a very different conversation and Cavs fans would still be sweating bullets about the possibility of a first-round series with Atlanta.

But for a second season in a row, JJ getting hurt has absolutely tanked the Hawks' season.


And yeah, ownership doesn't want the Bulls to give up on the revenues of gunning for the play-in, even if they've given AK the ok to get younger.

The UC may not be as exorbitant as MSG, but going to a bulls' game is no joke...driving up to Milwaukee for the Knicks' IST game was significantly cheaper than seeing the knicks come to chicago for a generic regular season game, and only about an hour more driving for me roundtrip...and they have kept that building packed in recent years.

Despite the team being extremely mid since they broke Lonzo, Donovan is a very good coach at squeezing the absolute most out of what limited talent management gives him to work with, so they've been inexplicably scrappy.


But even with Chicago refusing to roll over, Philly ostensibly still trying to make the playoffs, the loss of their Jalen, and selling at this deadline; Atlanta really should be locked into one of those play-in spots behind CLE / BOS / NYK / IND / MIL / ORL / MIA / DET. Which is exactly where most people picked them to finish.

Even as someone who really liked their offseason, and was predicting them to win 40-45 games with the potential to surpise, I still had them in the play-in before the season started. Philly's collapse opened the door to the top 8, but Detroit finally starting to look how I thought they would last year balances that out with JJ injured.
Capn'O wrote:We're the recovering meth addict older brother. And we've been clean for a few years now, thank you very much. Very uncouth to bring it up.

Brunson: So what are you paid to do?
Hart: Run around like an idiot during the game and f*** s*** up!
jayjaysee
King of the Trade Board
Posts: 20,831
And1: 7,801
Joined: Aug 05, 2012

Re: Shams: DeAndre Hunter to Cavs 

Post#44 » by jayjaysee » Fri Feb 7, 2025 4:11 pm

cgf wrote:
jayjaysee wrote:
cgf wrote:
Yeah. Before JJ went down I thought they had a shot at snagging the 6th seed if Orlando didn't get back on track or Milwaukee started to slip, but without him they were locked into a playoff spot unless Trae went down to. The east has gotten a lot stronger at the top, but the conference isn't as deep as the west, and one of those final two play-in spots is still very achievable for the Hawks even after selling at the deadline to clear capspace for the summer.

Plus those SAS picks are a sunken cost anyway. Atlanta's ability to improve their team is neither helped nor hindered by handing over a lower pick to the spurs.


Yeah, it would have cost a good asset to get out of the play-in and get to six. But it costs nothing to stay ahead of Chicago imo. The benefit of playing in the East and 5 teams behind you tanking..

But Chicago also didn’t really do what I expected, so maybe they still want to fight for 10th seed and their fans were right? I thought Chicago would’ve gotten value for at least 2 more guys on their roster..


Once JJ went down getting top 6 was out of the question IMO. If he had stayed healthy, however, and their FO been able to upgrade from Capela to someone at least as good as Poeltl, then we could be having a very different conversation and Cavs fans would still be sweating bullets about the possibility of a first-round series with Atlanta.

But for a second season in a row, JJ getting hurt has absolutely tanked the Hawks' season.


And yeah, ownership doesn't want the Bulls to give up on the revenues of gunning for the play-in, even if they've given AK the ok to get younger.

The UC may not be as exorbitant as MSG, but going to a bulls' game is no joke...driving up to Milwaukee for the Knicks' IST game was significantly cheaper than seeing the knicks come to chicago for a generic regular season game, and only about an hour more driving for me roundtrip...and they have kept that building packed in recent years.

Despite the team being extremely mid since they broke Lonzo, Donovan is a very good coach at squeezing the absolute most out of what limited talent management gives him to work with, so they've been inexplicably scrappy.


But even with Chicago refusing to roll over, Philly ostensibly still trying to make the playoffs, the loss of their Jalen, and selling at this deadline; Atlanta really should be locked into one of those play-in spots behind CLE / BOS / NYK / IND / MIL / ORL / MIA / DET. Which is exactly where most people picked them to finish.

Even as someone who really liked their offseason, and was predicting them to win 40-45 games with the potential to surpise, I still had them in the play-in before the season started. Philly's collapse opened the door to the top 8, but Detroit finally starting to look how I thought they would last year balances that out with JJ injured.


Yeah. Agree with all of this.

Just to add to me, once they’re in the play-in.. I don’t really see the deadline deals majorly impacting their ability to win those games once they get there.

Either Trae is going to play out of his mind and they’ll win or he’ll get shut down by Suggs / outshined by Maxey/Cade/Herro and they’ll lose.

Caris/Mann will do a good enough impression of the other two
kobe_vs_jordan
RealGM
Posts: 10,656
And1: 5,065
Joined: Jan 07, 2012
Location: Atl
   

Re: Shams: DeAndre Hunter to Cavs 

Post#45 » by kobe_vs_jordan » Fri Feb 7, 2025 5:37 pm

Cavs should be ECFs favorite now IMO. Have the perimeter play to beat any team in East. Like them against most WCF contenders
cgf
RealGM
Posts: 35,077
And1: 14,446
Joined: Jul 01, 2008
   

Re: Shams: DeAndre Hunter to Cavs 

Post#46 » by cgf » Fri Feb 7, 2025 6:51 pm

kobe_vs_jordan wrote:Cavs should be ECFs favorite now IMO. Have the perimeter play to beat any team in East. Like them against most WCF contenders


I won't be surprised if any of Cleveland / Boston / New York / Indiana / Orlando / Milwaukee end up in the ECFs. I have a lot more doubts about the latter two...unless Orlando can get back to the level they were at before the injuries tanked their season...but even those two could go on a run it wouldn't be a shock.

If not for injuries, the playoffs should be a bloodbath in the east.
Capn'O wrote:We're the recovering meth addict older brother. And we've been clean for a few years now, thank you very much. Very uncouth to bring it up.

Brunson: So what are you paid to do?
Hart: Run around like an idiot during the game and f*** s*** up!
cgf
RealGM
Posts: 35,077
And1: 14,446
Joined: Jul 01, 2008
   

Re: Shams: DeAndre Hunter to Cavs 

Post#47 » by cgf » Fri Feb 7, 2025 7:16 pm

jayjaysee wrote:
cgf wrote:
jayjaysee wrote:
Yeah, it would have cost a good asset to get out of the play-in and get to six. But it costs nothing to stay ahead of Chicago imo. The benefit of playing in the East and 5 teams behind you tanking..

But Chicago also didn’t really do what I expected, so maybe they still want to fight for 10th seed and their fans were right? I thought Chicago would’ve gotten value for at least 2 more guys on their roster..


Once JJ went down getting top 6 was out of the question IMO. If he had stayed healthy, however, and their FO been able to upgrade from Capela to someone at least as good as Poeltl, then we could be having a very different conversation and Cavs fans would still be sweating bullets about the possibility of a first-round series with Atlanta.

But for a second season in a row, JJ getting hurt has absolutely tanked the Hawks' season.


And yeah, ownership doesn't want the Bulls to give up on the revenues of gunning for the play-in, even if they've given AK the ok to get younger.

The UC may not be as exorbitant as MSG, but going to a bulls' game is no joke...driving up to Milwaukee for the Knicks' IST game was significantly cheaper than seeing the knicks come to chicago for a generic regular season game, and only about an hour more driving for me roundtrip...and they have kept that building packed in recent years.

Despite the team being extremely mid since they broke Lonzo, Donovan is a very good coach at squeezing the absolute most out of what limited talent management gives him to work with, so they've been inexplicably scrappy.


But even with Chicago refusing to roll over, Philly ostensibly still trying to make the playoffs, the loss of their Jalen, and selling at this deadline; Atlanta really should be locked into one of those play-in spots behind CLE / BOS / NYK / IND / MIL / ORL / MIA / DET. Which is exactly where most people picked them to finish.

Even as someone who really liked their offseason, and was predicting them to win 40-45 games with the potential to surpise, I still had them in the play-in before the season started. Philly's collapse opened the door to the top 8, but Detroit finally starting to look how I thought they would last year balances that out with JJ injured.


Yeah. Agree with all of this.

Just to add to me, once they’re in the play-in.. I don’t really see the deadline deals majorly impacting their ability to win those games once they get there.

Either Trae is going to play out of his mind and they’ll win or he’ll get shut down by Suggs / outshined by Maxey/Cade/Herro and they’ll lose.

Caris/Mann will do a good enough impression of the other two


I suppose one could argue that the Hawks could beat Detroit without Trae going crazy if DD kept Cade in check...as I still expect Orlando to get their s*** together enough to clinch a top 6 finish over Miami / Detroit / Atlanta / Chicago / Philly / Toronto...but I agree that they'd need Trae to go off to beat Miami and if Trae went off enough to beat Miami before these trades then that would still be enough for them to beat Miami after these trades.

But I don't know what to make of Orlando. I won't be shocked if they're not right until next season, but they were so good before Franz & Suggs joined Paolo on the injured list that I can't pretend I'd be shocked to see them go on a run in the playoffs and win a couple series. Their defense is just brutal with Suggs at the POA, to the point that I'd rather face OKC & Houston's because the Magic have that tenacity & athleticism on the perimeter, with great length, AND great size / strength in the paint.
Capn'O wrote:We're the recovering meth addict older brother. And we've been clean for a few years now, thank you very much. Very uncouth to bring it up.

Brunson: So what are you paid to do?
Hart: Run around like an idiot during the game and f*** s*** up!
jbk1234
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 58,800
And1: 35,875
Joined: Dec 22, 2010
 

Re: Shams: DeAndre Hunter to Cavs 

Post#48 » by jbk1234 » Fri Feb 7, 2025 7:35 pm

Image
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
kobe_vs_jordan
RealGM
Posts: 10,656
And1: 5,065
Joined: Jan 07, 2012
Location: Atl
   

Re: Shams: DeAndre Hunter to Cavs 

Post#49 » by kobe_vs_jordan » Fri Feb 7, 2025 7:54 pm

jbk1234 wrote:Image

A sign of good locker room moral for real lol Hunter might found his new second home
jbk1234
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 58,800
And1: 35,875
Joined: Dec 22, 2010
 

Re: Shams: DeAndre Hunter to Cavs 

Post#50 » by jbk1234 » Fri Feb 7, 2025 7:57 pm

kobe_vs_jordan wrote:
jbk1234 wrote:Image

A sign of good locker room moral for real lol Hunter might found his new second home


They played together on that VA Championship team. They're friends.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.

Return to Trades and Transactions