Part II: PHI - SAC (Paul George to SAC)

Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger

Who Wins the Trade?

PHI by a lot
0
No votes
PHI
1
17%
PHI by a little
1
17%
Both / Fair Trade
3
50%
SAC by a little
0
No votes
SAC
0
No votes
SAC by a lot
1
17%
Neither
0
No votes
 
Total votes: 6

bpcox05
Analyst
Posts: 3,034
And1: 703
Joined: Dec 03, 2012
       

Part II: PHI - SAC (Paul George to SAC) 

Post#1 » by bpcox05 » Tue Feb 25, 2025 2:12 am

—————————

PHI GETS: Zach LaVine
PHI GIVES: Paul George & 2029 PHI 1st (Unprotected)
WHY FOR PHI? The 76ers swap George for LaVine who may be able to be a better 3rd scoring option for them with George’s recent offensive decline. They also save $4-5 mil a year since LaVine doesn’t make as much which should help them fill out the rest of their roster while remaining under the 1st apron. But not only is LaVine’s deal cheaper, it has 1 less year on the deal (which means they don’t have to worry about paying George when he is 37-38 years old).

PG - Maxey / McCain / Butler
SG - LaVine / Gordon / Walker
SF - Oubre / Edwards / Council
PF -
C - Embiid / Drummond / Bona

—————————

SAC Gets: Paul George & 2029 PHI 1st (Unprotected)
SAC Gives: Zach LaVine
Why for SAC? The Kings take on the worser contract, but on paper, George’s fit with the roster is much better as he gives the Kings some much needed size, length, and defense on the wing while at the same time being able to space the floor, score and make plays for others. The trade also frees up Ellis to start & close games at SG (which will be great for their defense).

PG - Monk
SG - Ellis / Carter
SF - George / DeRozan
PF - Murray
C - Sabonis / Valanciunas

———————
User avatar
JimmyPlopper
Head Coach
Posts: 7,332
And1: 10,062
Joined: Sep 25, 2020
Location: Donald B's is the place to give me the pace

Re: Part II: PHI - SAC (Paul George to SAC) 

Post#2 » by JimmyPlopper » Tue Feb 25, 2025 2:58 am

I think it's a pretty fair and well reasoned trade.
beatin down your block
OxAndFox
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,551
And1: 3,100
Joined: May 17, 2022
Contact:

Re: Part II: PHI - SAC (Paul George to SAC) 

Post#3 » by OxAndFox » Tue Feb 25, 2025 3:05 am

Think there is enough on both sides to have a little bit of fear, but from the Kings you do it and hope PG13 isn't completely done otherwise its a lot of money for an assistant playing coach.
NYG
RealGM
Posts: 14,986
And1: 2,983
Joined: Aug 09, 2017

Re: Part II: PHI - SAC (Paul George to SAC) 

Post#4 » by NYG » Tue Feb 25, 2025 3:10 am

OxAndFox wrote:Think there is enough on both sides to have a little bit of fear, but from the Kings you do it and hope PG13 isn't completely done otherwise its a lot of money for an assistant playing coach.


Yeah, the Kings should do this because if LaVine gets hurt in 2025-26 and George returns to 75-80% of the guy he was then that changes the trade values of each player very quickly.
bpcox05
Analyst
Posts: 3,034
And1: 703
Joined: Dec 03, 2012
       

Re: Part II: PHI - SAC (Paul George to SAC) 

Post#5 » by bpcox05 » Tue Feb 25, 2025 3:12 am

NYG wrote:
OxAndFox wrote:Think there is enough on both sides to have a little bit of fear, but from the Kings you do it and hope PG13 isn't completely done otherwise its a lot of money for an assistant playing coach.


Yeah, the Kings should do this because if LaVine gets hurt in 2025-26 and George returns to 75-80% of the guy he was then that changes the trade values of each player very quickly.

And if George does get hurt and misses time, the Kings at least still have DeRozan to slot in at starting SF.
OxAndFox
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,551
And1: 3,100
Joined: May 17, 2022
Contact:

Re: Part II: PHI - SAC (Paul George to SAC) 

Post#6 » by OxAndFox » Tue Feb 25, 2025 3:18 am

NYG wrote:
OxAndFox wrote:Think there is enough on both sides to have a little bit of fear, but from the Kings you do it and hope PG13 isn't completely done otherwise its a lot of money for an assistant playing coach.


Yeah, the Kings should do this because if LaVine gets hurt in 2025-26 and George returns to 75-80% of the guy he was then that changes the trade values of each player very quickly.


Yeah absolutely. Probably can't really trust either guy health wise. I would put money on the younger guy if I had to though, but I agree with your point that trade value could swing by mid next season.
User avatar
JimmyPlopper
Head Coach
Posts: 7,332
And1: 10,062
Joined: Sep 25, 2020
Location: Donald B's is the place to give me the pace

Re: Part II: PHI - SAC (Paul George to SAC) 

Post#7 » by JimmyPlopper » Tue Feb 25, 2025 3:20 am

As a Sixers fan, I love that we are getting rid of PG who has not fit in with our team. We also are getting a younger player in LaVine (by about five years) who has one fewer year on his contract. The risk is that the Sixers may very well stink in 2029 and they could be handing over something quite hefty in that respect. Maybe Philly asks for top three protection.
beatin down your block
OxAndFox
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,551
And1: 3,100
Joined: May 17, 2022
Contact:

Re: Part II: PHI - SAC (Paul George to SAC) 

Post#8 » by OxAndFox » Tue Feb 25, 2025 3:29 am

JimmyPlopper wrote:As a Sixers fan, I love that we are getting rid of PG who has not fit in with our team. We also are getting a younger player in LaVine (by about five years) who has one fewer year on his contract. The risk is that the Sixers may very well stink in 2029 and they could be handing over something quite hefty in that respect. Maybe Philly asks for top three protection.


Yeah I don't think some protection on the pick would be out of the question.
BoogieTime
General Manager
Posts: 8,370
And1: 3,059
Joined: Feb 09, 2017
 

Re: Part II: PHI - SAC (Paul George to SAC) 

Post#9 » by BoogieTime » Tue Feb 25, 2025 4:21 am

The Kings targeted LaVine because he’s a better player than Fox- Curry efficient scorer

He’s not leaving

And it shouldn’t have to be said George is a terrible contract
the_process
RealGM
Posts: 29,103
And1: 10,312
Joined: May 01, 2010

Re: Part II: PHI - SAC (Paul George to SAC) 

Post#10 » by the_process » Tue Feb 25, 2025 5:25 am

Not giving a first to dump PG. The team sucks, and appears that they will suck for the time being, so his salary is irrelevant.
Godaddycurse
RealGM
Posts: 21,921
And1: 13,854
Joined: Nov 13, 2019
 

Re: Part II: PHI - SAC (Paul George to SAC) 

Post#11 » by Godaddycurse » Tue Feb 25, 2025 5:38 am

the_process wrote:Not giving a first to dump PG. The team sucks, and appears that they will suck for the time being, so his salary is irrelevant.


You're not just dumping george though, you're getting back a much more productive player
the_process
RealGM
Posts: 29,103
And1: 10,312
Joined: May 01, 2010

Re: Part II: PHI - SAC (Paul George to SAC) 

Post#12 » by the_process » Tue Feb 25, 2025 6:09 am

Godaddycurse wrote:
the_process wrote:Not giving a first to dump PG. The team sucks, and appears that they will suck for the time being, so his salary is irrelevant.


You're not just dumping george though, you're getting back a much more productive player


LaVine was negative less than a year ago. Also the Sixers already have Maxey and McCain. And again, this team is going to suck for a couple years here now. So Zach holds little interest to the Sixers IMO.
SNPA
General Manager
Posts: 9,018
And1: 8,370
Joined: Apr 15, 2020

Re: Part II: PHI - SAC (Paul George to SAC) 

Post#13 » by SNPA » Tue Feb 25, 2025 6:42 am

OxAndFox wrote:
JimmyPlopper wrote:As a Sixers fan, I love that we are getting rid of PG who has not fit in with our team. We also are getting a younger player in LaVine (by about five years) who has one fewer year on his contract. The risk is that the Sixers may very well stink in 2029 and they could be handing over something quite hefty in that respect. Maybe Philly asks for top three protection.


Yeah I don't think some protection on the pick would be out of the question.

Out of the question I’d hope. This move is for the pick. PG is just cover and salary.

For me, this move is followed by trading either Sabonis-picks based package or Murray-picks based package, with DDR available along with other assets…for a franchise piece. The next generation of Kings, it’s the only way Monte survives a rebuild IMO or he is pair Sabonis with a true number one.
OxAndFox
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,551
And1: 3,100
Joined: May 17, 2022
Contact:

Re: Part II: PHI - SAC (Paul George to SAC) 

Post#14 » by OxAndFox » Tue Feb 25, 2025 7:14 am

SNPA wrote:
OxAndFox wrote:
JimmyPlopper wrote:As a Sixers fan, I love that we are getting rid of PG who has not fit in with our team. We also are getting a younger player in LaVine (by about five years) who has one fewer year on his contract. The risk is that the Sixers may very well stink in 2029 and they could be handing over something quite hefty in that respect. Maybe Philly asks for top three protection.


Yeah I don't think some protection on the pick would be out of the question.

Out of the question I’d hope. This move is for the pick. PG is just cover and salary.

For me, this move is followed by trading either Sabonis-picks based package or Murray-picks based package, with DDR available along with other assets…for a franchise piece. The next generation of Kings, it’s the only way Monte survives a rebuild IMO or he is pair Sabonis with a true number one.


You can still do both. Think this kind of a trade gives you a dual runway.

Option 1 - You got out of Lavine and got a pick and a higher upside player in PG13.
Option 2 - You got out of Lavine and got a pick but have to pay a guy another year.

If option 1 does indeed come off the follow up moves don't matter in your thought.
If option 2 does come off then yes, you can rebuild and take on contracts that line up with PG13, gain cap flexibility after that and drive hard into a full on rebuild.

Oh, and Monte isn't surviving this season and trade deadline train wreck. He is OUT.
tmorgan
RealGM
Posts: 14,258
And1: 9,743
Joined: Feb 04, 2005
Location: San Francisco, CA
   

Re: Part II: PHI - SAC (Paul George to SAC) 

Post#15 » by tmorgan » Tue Feb 25, 2025 8:16 am

I think Philly should, just to save face, ask for top 1 protection (ie, no matter much they suck, it’s only going to matter 14% of the time or less).

Otherwise, I kinda like it. It’s clear that PG in Philly is a frikkin disaster.

Return to Trades and Transactions