Cavs and Kings Offseason
Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger
Cavs and Kings Offseason
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,023
- And1: 293
- Joined: Jun 14, 2009
Cavs and Kings Offseason
I feel like the Cavs are likely still an additional big man away from winning a championship. Signing and trading for someone like Naz Reid would make a tremendous amount of sense but the team has a lot of guys who can play point guard (Mitchell, Jerome, Tyson, Porter) so wouldn’t mind moving Garland if that trade doesn’t work out to give the Cavs more size.
Sabonis for Garland
This gives Sacramento a younger point guard to play in the back court and someone the team can build around and the Cavs a big man for the rotation they need especially for depth purposes.
Sabonis for Garland
This gives Sacramento a younger point guard to play in the back court and someone the team can build around and the Cavs a big man for the rotation they need especially for depth purposes.
Re: Cavs and Kings Offseason
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,138
- And1: 2,491
- Joined: Jul 18, 2013
-
Re: Cavs and Kings Offseason
Nope. The Cavs need Garland, particularly if Jerome plays his way beyond what the Cavs can pay him.
The Cavs are looking at veteran ring chasers on the minimum.
The Cavs are looking at veteran ring chasers on the minimum.
Re: Cavs and Kings Offseason
-
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,499
- And1: 477
- Joined: Feb 16, 2016
Re: Cavs and Kings Offseason
That trade requires additional follow up trade of Allen going somewhere. Allen, Sabonis and Mobley do not make a good front line.
Re: Cavs and Kings Offseason
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,907
- And1: 12,054
- Joined: Sep 17, 2010
-
Re: Cavs and Kings Offseason
The Cavs want to invest all their money into Sabonis, Allen, Mobley? I don't really understand it.
And what are the Kings without Sabonis adding Garland, who plays in the front court? Keegan/Jval?
This seems wrong for both. kings either need to add to Sabonis, or tear it down. Cavs shouldn't be adding another big man lol
And what are the Kings without Sabonis adding Garland, who plays in the front court? Keegan/Jval?
This seems wrong for both. kings either need to add to Sabonis, or tear it down. Cavs shouldn't be adding another big man lol
Re: Cavs and Kings Offseason
-
- King of the Trade Board
- Posts: 20,830
- And1: 7,798
- Joined: Aug 05, 2012
Re: Cavs and Kings Offseason
I don’t think this base makes sense for Cleveland really.
But if you wanted to do it, I think it needs to include a Monk/Allen swap. No idea what is owed once that is added..
Doesn’t seem like a good idea for either team honestly. But Sabonis/Mobley/Hunter/Monk/Spida does feel like a really good fitting group as an outsider.
(The current Cavs group fits really well as well is the problem)
But if you wanted to do it, I think it needs to include a Monk/Allen swap. No idea what is owed once that is added..
Doesn’t seem like a good idea for either team honestly. But Sabonis/Mobley/Hunter/Monk/Spida does feel like a really good fitting group as an outsider.
(The current Cavs group fits really well as well is the problem)
Re: Cavs and Kings Offseason
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 58,795
- And1: 35,872
- Joined: Dec 22, 2010
-
Re: Cavs and Kings Offseason
One of the things that RealGM has convinced me of is that there are a lot of fans who fall for a type or particular aesthetic and they place more value on that than actual success. This has no chance whatsoever from the Cavs end.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Re: Cavs and Kings Offseason
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,023
- And1: 293
- Joined: Jun 14, 2009
Re: Cavs and Kings Offseason
louc1970 wrote:That trade requires additional follow up trade of Allen going somewhere. Allen, Sabonis and Mobley do not make a good front line.
They wouldn’t all start. Allen would come off the bench and Hunter would start. The goal would be to get another good big man.
Garland and Travers for Murray, Derozan, and Larevia with a pick or something they got for Fox might make sense too.
Re: Cavs and Kings Offseason
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,394
- And1: 907
- Joined: May 02, 2020
-
Re: Cavs and Kings Offseason
louc1970 wrote:That trade requires additional follow up trade of Allen going somewhere. Allen, Sabonis and Mobley do not make a good front line.
Yes, for example the Kings who are left without a starting level center
Old Mike Lorenzo
Re: Cavs and Kings Offseason
- mcfly1204
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,913
- And1: 2,561
- Joined: Oct 31, 2008
Re: Cavs and Kings Offseason
This trade is far too extreme. You don't typically want to open a larger hole than you're filling. Cleveland would be better off going after someone like Naz Reid as a bench big, it's certainly not going to cost you Garland.
Well at least we're not Detroit!
Re: Cavs and Kings Offseason
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,138
- And1: 2,491
- Joined: Jul 18, 2013
-
Re: Cavs and Kings Offseason
mcfly1204 wrote:This trade is far too extreme. You don't typically want to open a larger hole than you're filling. Cleveland would be better off going after someone like Naz Reid as a bench big, it's certainly not going to cost you Garland.
Forget Naz Reid. The Cavs don't need a starter-level player. They need a bench big and they shouldn't pay more than the minimum for one.
Definitely put in calls to Brook Lopez and Clint Capela if they feel like winding down their PT late in their careers although we're probably looking at Boucher, Nance, Yabusele, Plumlee, Lyles.
Re: Cavs and Kings Offseason
-
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,499
- And1: 477
- Joined: Feb 16, 2016
Re: Cavs and Kings Offseason
Cavs could make a very simple call to the Australian league and pick up Montrezl Harrell. He will come in and bang around for 10-15 minutes a game, not need the ball, and just disrupt the game. Can be had for cheap.
Re: Cavs and Kings Offseason
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,222
- And1: 3,952
- Joined: Mar 19, 2015
- Location: Puerto Rico
-
Re: Cavs and Kings Offseason
This trade doesn’t make sense for the Cavs. Where do you put Sabonis? Off the bench?
Garland is untouchable.
Garland is untouchable.
Re: Cavs and Kings Offseason
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,129
- And1: 644
- Joined: Jun 03, 2007
-
Re: Cavs and Kings Offseason
Trade doesn't really make sense either way. Cavaliers don't really need a Sabonis and we wouldn't have a center to start unless we start JV in 2025-2026.
Re: Cavs and Kings Offseason
-
- Freshman
- Posts: 60
- And1: 60
- Joined: Feb 06, 2022
Re: Cavs and Kings Offseason
LightTheBeam wrote:The Cavs want to invest all their money into Sabonis, Allen, Mobley? I don't really understand it.
And what are the Kings without Sabonis adding Garland, who plays in the front court? Keegan/Jval?
This seems wrong for both. kings either need to add to Sabonis, or tear it down. Cavs shouldn't be adding another big man lol
If we traded Sabonis for Garland,
I'd 100% roll the dice on a Zion for a 1st trade.
Garland
Lavine
Keegan
Zion
Val
Re: Cavs and Kings Offseason
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,843
- And1: 9,278
- Joined: May 28, 2020
-
Re: Cavs and Kings Offseason
Cavs could definitely use a backup big man to help their commitment to panting Mobley/Allen together rather than staggering their minutes as much.
Trading their all star PG for another all star C is not the answer though lol
Trading their all star PG for another all star C is not the answer though lol
Re: Cavs and Kings Offseason
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,687
- And1: 1,363
- Joined: Oct 02, 2005
Re: Cavs and Kings Offseason
Why in the world would the Kings want to go get yet another mid size guard???
Re: Cavs and Kings Offseason
- mcfly1204
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,913
- And1: 2,561
- Joined: Oct 31, 2008
Re: Cavs and Kings Offseason
OGSactownballer wrote:Why in the world would the Kings want to go get yet another mid size guard???
Because he's younger and better than the one ya'll just sent out?
Well at least we're not Detroit!
Re: Cavs and Kings Offseason
- yoyoboy
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,866
- And1: 19,073
- Joined: Jan 29, 2015
-
Re: Cavs and Kings Offseason
How does swapping Garland for Sabonis make us better against OKC/Boston?
Re: Cavs and Kings Offseason
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,247
- And1: 7,519
- Joined: Sep 05, 2023
-
Re: Cavs and Kings Offseason
LightTheBeam wrote:The Cavs want to invest all their money into Sabonis, Allen, Mobley? I don't really understand it.
And what are the Kings without Sabonis adding Garland, who plays in the front court? Keegan/Jval?
This seems wrong for both. kings either need to add to Sabonis, or tear it down. Cavs shouldn't be adding another big man lol
Only thing I disagree with here is Cavs shouldn’t be adding another big man. They definitely need one, especially if Mobley or Allen go down.
LakerLegend wrote:LeBron was literally more athletic at 35 than he was at 20
Re: Cavs and Kings Offseason
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 58,795
- And1: 35,872
- Joined: Dec 22, 2010
-
Re: Cavs and Kings Offseason
yoyoboy wrote:How does swapping Garland for Sabonis make us better against OKC/Boston?
There's a small minority of fans who never got over the Cavs picking Garland over Sexton (despite the mountain of evidence demonstrating it was the correct call). There's no accounting for taste.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Return to Trades and Transactions