Swapping ou bad contracts - PHO/POR

Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger

aguiar95
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,347
And1: 612
Joined: Mar 10, 2020
     

Swapping ou bad contracts - PHO/POR 

Post#1 » by aguiar95 » Sun Mar 2, 2025 10:20 pm

Obviously this only happens if Beal aproves (POR promises the starting spot and primary ball handler role):

PHX in: Grant, Williams III
PHX out: Beal, #30, '29 worst of UTA/CLE/MIN

Why? Get out of the Beal trouble and get two rotation pieces at positions of need.

Jones/Booker/Durant/Grant/Williams III
Morris/Allen/O'Neale/Bol Bol/Richards

POR in: Beal, #30, '29 worst of UTA/CLE/MIN
POR out: Grant, Williams III

Why? Get a disgruntled star to help develop their pieces (only 2 years) and add two late picks to their chest (probably has to sell Simons). Don't lose much on-court since they have younger guys that are outplaying Grant/Williams.

Beal/Sharpe/Avdija/Camara/Ayton
Henderson/Simons/#11/#30/Clingan
jayjaysee
King of the Trade Board
Posts: 20,830
And1: 7,798
Joined: Aug 05, 2012

Re: Swapping ou bad contracts - PHO/POR 

Post#2 » by jayjaysee » Sun Mar 2, 2025 10:22 pm

Can’t trade 2027 due to choosing to trade the 2026 to Charlotte.

Legal with the 2028 or 2029 firsts which are equally as terrible?

I don’t think you can keep KD after shopping him like they did. And cant see Beal agreeing to go to Portland for 2 years.
JRoy
RealGM
Posts: 16,533
And1: 13,892
Joined: Feb 27, 2019
 

Re: Swapping ou bad contracts - PHO/POR 

Post#3 » by JRoy » Sun Mar 2, 2025 10:24 pm

aguiar95 wrote:Obviously this only happens if Beal aproves (POR promises the starting spot and primary ball handler role):

PHX in: Grant, Williams III
PHX out: Beal, #30, '27 worst of UTA/CLE/MIN

Why? Get out of the Beal trouble and get two rotation pieces at positions of need.

Jones/Booker/Durant/Grant/Williams III
Morris/Allen/O'Neale/Bol Bol/Richards

POR in: Beal, #30, '27 worst of UTA/CLE/MIN
POR out: Grant, Williams III

Why? Get a disgruntled star to help develop their pieces (only 2 years) and add two late picks to their chest (probably has to sell Simons). Don't lose much on-court since they have younger guys that are outplaying Grant/Williams.

Beal/Sharpe/Avdija/Camara/Ayton
Henderson/Simons/#11/#30/Clingan


Hell no for POR.

That’s the worst contract in the league.
Edrees wrote:
JRoy wrote:Monta Ellis have it all


I was hoping and expecting this to be one of the first replies. You did not disappoint. Jroy have it all.
Myth
RealGM
Posts: 11,781
And1: 10,440
Joined: Oct 01, 2008
   

Re: Swapping ou bad contracts - PHO/POR 

Post#4 » by Myth » Sun Mar 2, 2025 10:41 pm

I would do this if Blazers could send out a bit more salary (Thybulle?). Then I would play Beal minimally or try to discuss a buyout. It then becomes a roster downgrade, but shave a year of Grant for a couple late 1sts. But I can’t imagine Beal waiving his no trade clause for this.
Tim Lehrbach
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 26,098
And1: 4,359
Joined: Jul 29, 2001
   

Re: Swapping ou bad contracts - PHO/POR 

Post#5 » by Tim Lehrbach » Sun Mar 2, 2025 10:43 pm

I'm sure the Blazers would love to cut a year from Grant's contact, but this is pretty extreme. Beal's contact kills any payroll flexibility the team might have over the next two summers. The picks are OK but not too enticing. Never thought I'd refuse an offer with picks for Jerami, but I don't think Portland does it. Beal probably says no, regardless.
Clipsz 4 Life
January 20, 2002-May 17, 2006
Saxon
February 20, 2001-August 9, 2007
User avatar
Mr Puddles
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,329
And1: 13,888
Joined: Jan 17, 2015
Location: Under your bed
 

Re: Swapping ou bad contracts - PHO/POR 

Post#6 » by Mr Puddles » Mon Mar 3, 2025 1:52 am

JRoy wrote:
aguiar95 wrote:Obviously this only happens if Beal aproves (POR promises the starting spot and primary ball handler role):

PHX in: Grant, Williams III
PHX out: Beal, #30, '27 worst of UTA/CLE/MIN

Why? Get out of the Beal trouble and get two rotation pieces at positions of need.

Jones/Booker/Durant/Grant/Williams III
Morris/Allen/O'Neale/Bol Bol/Richards

POR in: Beal, #30, '27 worst of UTA/CLE/MIN
POR out: Grant, Williams III

Why? Get a disgruntled star to help develop their pieces (only 2 years) and add two late picks to their chest (probably has to sell Simons). Don't lose much on-court since they have younger guys that are outplaying Grant/Williams.

Beal/Sharpe/Avdija/Camara/Ayton
Henderson/Simons/#11/#30/Clingan


Hell no for POR.

That’s the worst contract in the league.


True, and the blazers are getting rid of it while receiving two picks in the process!
JRoy
RealGM
Posts: 16,533
And1: 13,892
Joined: Feb 27, 2019
 

Re: Swapping ou bad contracts - PHO/POR 

Post#7 » by JRoy » Mon Mar 3, 2025 2:01 am

Mr Puddles wrote:
JRoy wrote:
aguiar95 wrote:Obviously this only happens if Beal aproves (POR promises the starting spot and primary ball handler role):

PHX in: Grant, Williams III
PHX out: Beal, #30, '27 worst of UTA/CLE/MIN

Why? Get out of the Beal trouble and get two rotation pieces at positions of need.

Jones/Booker/Durant/Grant/Williams III
Morris/Allen/O'Neale/Bol Bol/Richards

POR in: Beal, #30, '27 worst of UTA/CLE/MIN
POR out: Grant, Williams III

Why? Get a disgruntled star to help develop their pieces (only 2 years) and add two late picks to their chest (probably has to sell Simons). Don't lose much on-court since they have younger guys that are outplaying Grant/Williams.

Beal/Sharpe/Avdija/Camara/Ayton
Henderson/Simons/#11/#30/Clingan


Hell no for POR.

That’s the worst contract in the league.


True, and the blazers are getting rid of it while receiving two picks in the process!


Rubbish.

Beal is the worst contract in the league.

Grant is also terrible but no NTC.
Edrees wrote:
JRoy wrote:Monta Ellis have it all


I was hoping and expecting this to be one of the first replies. You did not disappoint. Jroy have it all.
User avatar
Mr Puddles
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,329
And1: 13,888
Joined: Jan 17, 2015
Location: Under your bed
 

Re: Swapping ou bad contracts - PHO/POR 

Post#8 » by Mr Puddles » Mon Mar 3, 2025 2:20 am

JRoy wrote:
Mr Puddles wrote:
JRoy wrote:
Hell no for POR.

That’s the worst contract in the league.


True, and the blazers are getting rid of it while receiving two picks in the process!


Rubbish.

Beal is the worst contract in the league.

Grant is also terrible but no NTC.


They're owed the same amount of total money but Beal has been a markedly better player than Grant this year, and his contract expires a year earlier. It really depends on if you'd rather pay the 110 mil +/- over three years or two, there's an argument to be made for either.

I can see why Blazer fans wouldn't want to do this trade, but mostly because they probably don't want to kill the momentum they have going on now.
JRoy
RealGM
Posts: 16,533
And1: 13,892
Joined: Feb 27, 2019
 

Re: Swapping ou bad contracts - PHO/POR 

Post#9 » by JRoy » Mon Mar 3, 2025 2:25 am

Mr Puddles wrote:
JRoy wrote:
Mr Puddles wrote:
True, and the blazers are getting rid of it while receiving two picks in the process!


Rubbish.

Beal is the worst contract in the league.

Grant is also terrible but no NTC.


They're owed the same amount of total money but Beal has been a markedly better player than Grant this year, and his contract expires a year earlier. It really depends on if you'd rather pay the 110 mil +/- over three years or two, there's an argument to be made for either.

I can see why Blazer fans wouldn't want to do this trade, but mostly because they probably don't want to kill the momentum they have going on now.


The NTC is the difference maker.
Edrees wrote:
JRoy wrote:Monta Ellis have it all


I was hoping and expecting this to be one of the first replies. You did not disappoint. Jroy have it all.
User avatar
Mr Puddles
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,329
And1: 13,888
Joined: Jan 17, 2015
Location: Under your bed
 

Re: Swapping ou bad contracts - PHO/POR 

Post#10 » by Mr Puddles » Mon Mar 3, 2025 2:43 am

JRoy wrote:
Mr Puddles wrote:
JRoy wrote:
Rubbish.

Beal is the worst contract in the league.

Grant is also terrible but no NTC.


They're owed the same amount of total money but Beal has been a markedly better player than Grant this year, and his contract expires a year earlier. It really depends on if you'd rather pay the 110 mil +/- over three years or two, there's an argument to be made for either.

I can see why Blazer fans wouldn't want to do this trade, but mostly because they probably don't want to kill the momentum they have going on now.


The NTC is the difference maker.


Grant's contract is pretty much immovable anyway, my thinking is that the blazers are better off just letting either contract ride out rather than attaching assets to trade either guy in the future. But even if you argue that the NTC is the difference maker in their contracts, OP is offering two first round picks to compensate for that.
DeBlazerRiddem
Forum Mod - Blazers
Forum Mod - Blazers
Posts: 14,612
And1: 6,605
Joined: Mar 11, 2010

Re: Swapping ou bad contracts - PHO/POR 

Post#11 » by DeBlazerRiddem » Mon Mar 3, 2025 2:53 am

Convincing Portland isnt even the biggest hurdle for this deal.

Beal is not waiving his NTC to go to a high tax, bad weather, small market bottom feeder. I would be absolutely shocked if he did.

Return to Trades and Transactions