T&T board top 10 worst contracts - Vote for #10

Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger

gswhoops
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 34,532
And1: 6,172
Joined: Apr 27, 2005
   

Re: T&T board top 10 worst contracts - Vote for #10 

Post#21 » by gswhoops » Fri Mar 7, 2025 7:28 pm

tmorgan wrote:
brackdan70 wrote:
tmorgan wrote:Butler is still a very good player. Yeah, he might fade over the next two years on that fat extension, and yeah, his emo dick routine is tiresome, but he clearly plays winning basketball as of today.

I don’t think he’s in my worst 20, or maybe even 30, contracts. It’s just two more years.

I can certainly respect your opinion but I feel those 2 years/ 111m at age 36 and 37 for a dude who hasn’t played more than 65 games in 8 years is going to be a problem.
For those 2 years he makes 3 times + what Patrick Williams makes. Williams last 2 years are basically mid level.


But it’s also ‘what do they contribute?” Butler has helped turn the Warriors around this year, and he at least might continue to do so over the next two seasons. And if Steph suddenly retires or something, they’ll get value back trading him, almost guaranteed.

Pat Williams is still a kid, staring off into the sky, guarding his man and doing almost nothing else worthwhile. He is the poster child for “stay in your lane”, except his lane doesn’t really go anywhere. 18 mil per for 4 more years doing stuff you could get from a defensive specialist on a 2-way is just sad.

I mean, the proof is in the pudding. GSW are 10-1 when Butler plays and under .500 when he doesn't. He's had a positive plus-minus in 8 of those 10 wins. His contract might (not guaranteed) look ugly towards the end but he's still a high-impact player.
ReggiesKnicks
Veteran
Posts: 2,747
And1: 2,269
Joined: Jan 25, 2025
   

Re: T&T board top 10 worst contracts - Vote for #10 

Post#22 » by ReggiesKnicks » Fri Mar 7, 2025 7:31 pm

brackdan70 wrote:
ReggiesKnicks wrote:
brackdan70 wrote:Butler


Butler was just traded for a 1st, Wiggins and small 2026 salary.

How does he belong here?

He then was extended after that trade. 2 more seasons for a total of 111m after this season.
Aging, injury history, history of being a problem when things aren’t going right.


Part of the trade was the extension though. That's why only a few teams could trade for him. That should definitely be factored into the value.

That was stated publicly through multiple sources that a Butler trade was difficult because he would only play if he got the extension, meaning that was his value with the extension.
brackdan70
RealGM
Posts: 18,015
And1: 12,825
Joined: Jul 15, 2013
Location: Ogden, UT
   

Re: T&T board top 10 worst contracts - Vote for #10 

Post#23 » by brackdan70 » Fri Mar 7, 2025 8:11 pm

ReggiesKnicks wrote:
brackdan70 wrote:
ReggiesKnicks wrote:
Butler was just traded for a 1st, Wiggins and small 2026 salary.

How does he belong here?

He then was extended after that trade. 2 more seasons for a total of 111m after this season.
Aging, injury history, history of being a problem when things aren’t going right.


Part of the trade was the extension though. That's why only a few teams could trade for him. That should definitely be factored into the value.

That was stated publicly through multiple sources that a Butler trade was difficult because he would only play if he got the extension, meaning that was his value with the extension.

Eh. Maybe. I think it’s a pretty unique perceived fit at GS. I think that contract will be impossible to move going forward. He will make 111 million in his age 36 and 37 seasons. He hasn’t played over 65 games since 2016-17. I would bet against him playing over 3000 minutes in these next 2 seasons combined. I think availability matters, and He hasn’t been lately.
Jordan Walsh > Lonnie Walker
ReggiesKnicks
Veteran
Posts: 2,747
And1: 2,269
Joined: Jan 25, 2025
   

Re: T&T board top 10 worst contracts - Vote for #10 

Post#24 » by ReggiesKnicks » Fri Mar 7, 2025 8:13 pm

brackdan70 wrote:
ReggiesKnicks wrote:
brackdan70 wrote:He then was extended after that trade. 2 more seasons for a total of 111m after this season.
Aging, injury history, history of being a problem when things aren’t going right.


Part of the trade was the extension though. That's why only a few teams could trade for him. That should definitely be factored into the value.

That was stated publicly through multiple sources that a Butler trade was difficult because he would only play if he got the extension, meaning that was his value with the extension.

Eh. Maybe. I think it’s a pretty unique perceived fit at GS. I think that contract will be impossible to move going forward. He will make 111 million in his age 36 and 37 seasons. He hasn’t played over 65 games since 2016-17. I would bet against him playing over 3000 minutes in these next 2 seasons combined. I think availability matters, and He hasn’t been lately.


All this is true but we saw what his value is. Someone like Patrick Williams wouldn't receive a fraction of this.
brackdan70
RealGM
Posts: 18,015
And1: 12,825
Joined: Jul 15, 2013
Location: Ogden, UT
   

Re: T&T board top 10 worst contracts - Vote for #10 

Post#25 » by brackdan70 » Fri Mar 7, 2025 8:18 pm

ReggiesKnicks wrote:
brackdan70 wrote:
ReggiesKnicks wrote:
Part of the trade was the extension though. That's why only a few teams could trade for him. That should definitely be factored into the value.

That was stated publicly through multiple sources that a Butler trade was difficult because he would only play if he got the extension, meaning that was his value with the extension.

Eh. Maybe. I think it’s a pretty unique perceived fit at GS. I think that contract will be impossible to move going forward. He will make 111 million in his age 36 and 37 seasons. He hasn’t played over 65 games since 2016-17. I would bet against him playing over 3000 minutes in these next 2 seasons combined. I think availability matters, and He hasn’t been lately.


All this is true but we saw what his value is. Someone like Patrick Williams wouldn't receive a fraction of this.

I am not saying Williams is a good contract by any means.
I guess I am thinking forward and others are thinking present. I think his value was very specific to GSW right now. I don’t think he can be easily moved to another team going forward. Just my opinion. I can’t think of another team that would trade for him and give positive value next offseason.
Jordan Walsh > Lonnie Walker
Stanq
Senior
Posts: 519
And1: 515
Joined: Jun 23, 2016
 

Re: T&T board top 10 worst contracts - Vote for #10 

Post#26 » by Stanq » Fri Mar 7, 2025 8:31 pm

Vote: Ayton
gswhoops
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 34,532
And1: 6,172
Joined: Apr 27, 2005
   

Re: T&T board top 10 worst contracts - Vote for #10 

Post#27 » by gswhoops » Fri Mar 7, 2025 8:34 pm

brackdan70 wrote:
ReggiesKnicks wrote:
brackdan70 wrote:Eh. Maybe. I think it’s a pretty unique perceived fit at GS. I think that contract will be impossible to move going forward. He will make 111 million in his age 36 and 37 seasons. He hasn’t played over 65 games since 2016-17. I would bet against him playing over 3000 minutes in these next 2 seasons combined. I think availability matters, and He hasn’t been lately.


All this is true but we saw what his value is. Someone like Patrick Williams wouldn't receive a fraction of this.

I am not saying Williams is a good contract by any means.
I guess I am thinking forward and others are thinking present. I think his value was very specific to GSW right now. I don’t think he can be easily moved to another team going forward. Just my opinion. I can’t think of another team that would trade for him and give positive value next offseason.

By the same token though, who is giving positive value for Patrick Williams next offseason?
vxmike
Head Coach
Posts: 6,644
And1: 4,539
Joined: Sep 24, 2014
 

Re: T&T board top 10 worst contracts - Vote for #10 

Post#28 » by vxmike » Fri Mar 7, 2025 10:39 pm

tmorgan wrote:I’ll switch from Barrett to PWill just because Statue Pat deserves to be on the list. Guy just doesn’t do much, and while the money isn’t huge, it’s sooooo many years.

V Patrick Williams.


I’m on board too. I have been voting Ingram but gonna go with Pat now. Ingram at least had the chance to be good if healthy. PWill is pretty much guaranteed to be a zero.

V: Pat Williams
tmorgan
RealGM
Posts: 14,258
And1: 9,743
Joined: Feb 04, 2005
Location: San Francisco, CA
   

Re: T&T board top 10 worst contracts - Vote for #10 

Post#29 » by tmorgan » Fri Mar 7, 2025 10:40 pm

I am 100% certain that, if the contracts were available, almost any contending team with a need at wing would trade expirings for Butler at the next TDL, assuming he’s healthy.

I am also 100% certain, barring a major breakout from PWill in season 6, that that isn’t true for him.
User avatar
luciano-davidwesley
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 7,958
And1: 2,694
Joined: Aug 03, 2002
Location: Gold Coast
Contact:
   

Re: T&T board top 10 worst contracts - Vote for #10 

Post#30 » by luciano-davidwesley » Sat Mar 8, 2025 2:53 am

V Ingram

HM Pat Williams, Butler when he's geriatric
brackdan70
RealGM
Posts: 18,015
And1: 12,825
Joined: Jul 15, 2013
Location: Ogden, UT
   

Re: T&T board top 10 worst contracts - Vote for #10 

Post#31 » by brackdan70 » Sat Mar 8, 2025 3:13 am

gswhoops wrote:
brackdan70 wrote:
ReggiesKnicks wrote:
All this is true but we saw what his value is. Someone like Patrick Williams wouldn't receive a fraction of this.

I am not saying Williams is a good contract by any means.
I guess I am thinking forward and others are thinking present. I think his value was very specific to GSW right now. I don’t think he can be easily moved to another team going forward. Just my opinion. I can’t think of another team that would trade for him and give positive value next offseason.

By the same token though, who is giving positive value for Patrick Williams next offseason?

Yeah no one, but you can move it and maybe he grows into it. In this CBA I don’t think you can move butler at 2/111.
Jordan Walsh > Lonnie Walker
ReggiesKnicks
Veteran
Posts: 2,747
And1: 2,269
Joined: Jan 25, 2025
   

Re: T&T board top 10 worst contracts - Vote for #10 

Post#32 » by ReggiesKnicks » Sat Mar 8, 2025 3:56 am

brackdan70 wrote:
gswhoops wrote:
brackdan70 wrote:I am not saying Williams is a good contract by any means.
I guess I am thinking forward and others are thinking present. I think his value was very specific to GSW right now. I don’t think he can be easily moved to another team going forward. Just my opinion. I can’t think of another team that would trade for him and give positive value next offseason.

By the same token though, who is giving positive value for Patrick Williams next offseason?

Yeah no one, but you can move it and maybe he grows into it. In this CBA I don’t think you can move butler at 2/111.


Woah, I disagree big time with this.

There is always going to be a team or teams who believe they are a Jimmy Butler away from competing for a title. Every single season there will be 1-2 teams who tell themselves that, or more.

OTOH, nobody is going to be a Patrick Williams away from competing or be a rebuilding team tying up 4 years of cap for him and losing flexibility.

It's so weird seeing a Celtics fan of all people miscalculating post-season Jimmy Butler and just how valuable his skill-set is around the league.
brackdan70
RealGM
Posts: 18,015
And1: 12,825
Joined: Jul 15, 2013
Location: Ogden, UT
   

Re: T&T board top 10 worst contracts - Vote for #10 

Post#33 » by brackdan70 » Sat Mar 8, 2025 4:07 am

ReggiesKnicks wrote:
brackdan70 wrote:
gswhoops wrote:By the same token though, who is giving positive value for Patrick Williams next offseason?

Yeah no one, but you can move it and maybe he grows into it. In this CBA I don’t think you can move butler at 2/111.


Woah, I disagree big time with this.

There is always going to be a team or teams who believe they are a Jimmy Butler away from competing for a title. Every single season there will be 1-2 teams who tell themselves that, or more.

OTOH, nobody is going to be a Patrick Williams away from competing or be a rebuilding team tying up 4 years of cap for him and losing flexibility.

It's so weird seeing a Celtics fan of all people miscalculating post-season Jimmy Butler and just how valuable his skill-set is around the league.

He is not 33 anymore. He wasn’t available for the playoffs last year. Maybe he will be this year. You are talking about the past, I am valuing his contract for the future.
Jordan Walsh > Lonnie Walker
User avatar
SkyHook
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,052
And1: 3,370
Joined: Jun 24, 2002
 

Re: T&T board top 10 worst contracts - Vote for #10 

Post#34 » by SkyHook » Sat Mar 8, 2025 5:35 am

Butler
"When the mob and the press and the whole world tell you to move, your job is to plant yourself like a tree beside the river of truth, and tell the whole world...

... NO, YOU MOVE."
User avatar
Dr Positivity
RealGM
Posts: 62,665
And1: 16,362
Joined: Apr 29, 2009
       

Re: T&T board top 10 worst contracts - Vote for #10 

Post#35 » by Dr Positivity » Mon Mar 10, 2025 3:07 am

Pat Williams 8

Butler 2

Barrett 1

Ayton 1

Ingram 1


Williams runs away with last vote. I will post the full list thread later.
Liberate The Zoomers
User avatar
Scoot McGroot
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 44,758
And1: 14,018
Joined: Feb 16, 2005
     

Re: T&T board top 10 worst contracts - Vote for #10 

Post#36 » by Scoot McGroot » Mon Mar 10, 2025 10:18 pm

Dr Positivity wrote:
Image

Zeke Nnaji (2 years, 24.5 million)


Nnaji has an additional player option year. He has 3 more years total under contract.
User avatar
Dr Positivity
RealGM
Posts: 62,665
And1: 16,362
Joined: Apr 29, 2009
       

Re: T&T board top 10 worst contracts - Vote for #10 

Post#37 » by Dr Positivity » Mon Mar 10, 2025 10:26 pm

Scoot McGroot wrote:Nnaji has an additional player option year. He has 3 more years total under contract.


Yes I messed that up as it's 3 years including this year with an option 4th, I think Pat Williams would have still won though.
Liberate The Zoomers

Return to Trades and Transactions