Kings/Pistons

Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger

Astaluego
Starter
Posts: 2,394
And1: 907
Joined: May 02, 2020
   

Kings/Pistons 

Post#1 » by Astaluego » Fri May 2, 2025 6:01 pm

KINGS
In: Harris/Ivey/Fontecchio
Out:Murray/Lavine

They get a young, high-potential prospect at a position of need, they take Lavine's contract off the books and sell Murray before paying him. They get Harris, who helps them stay competitive.

PISTONS
In: Murray/Lavine
Out: Ivey /Harris/Fontecchio

They fit their pieces better, you get a star to play alongside Cade (Lavine never played with a PG as good as Cade) and a 3D Big Wing that should fit perfectly

Cade/Lavine/Thompson/Murray/Duren
Schroeder/Sasser/Beasley/Holland/Stewart
Old Mike Lorenzo
LightTheBeam
RealGM
Posts: 18,895
And1: 12,042
Joined: Sep 17, 2010
     

Re: Kings/Pistons 

Post#2 » by LightTheBeam » Fri May 2, 2025 6:40 pm

Thoughts here - LaVine sucks, value is probably about right. But I don't really value Tobias or Fontecchio, and Ivey is coming off a terrible injury. Kings shouldnt be using Murray to take this kind of risk unless they are planning to tear it down and have more moves lined up.
tmorgan
RealGM
Posts: 14,253
And1: 9,730
Joined: Feb 04, 2005
Location: San Francisco, CA
   

Re: Kings/Pistons 

Post#3 » by tmorgan » Fri May 2, 2025 9:43 pm

Lavine is very good at what he does. But he doesn’t do much (score… and score), and he makes too much money for his role.

I know the Pistons need offense, not arguing otherwise. But we need it from a non-guard preferably, and we’re trying to cultivate this hard-nosed defensive identity. Putting a gaping hole in your defense is not the plan.

And yeah, I know Ivey isn’t a good defender, either. But there’s at least a chance he gets better. Lavine is who he is.

Lastly, if we’re going to commit to a second large salary (Cade’s second contract starts next year), it needs to be a really, really good fit. ZL’s scoring is a good fit — but playing SG is not, and the rest of his warts are not. This probably makes us better (factoring in Keegan), but not a contender, and we’re sort of stuck after this move.
BoogieTime
General Manager
Posts: 8,367
And1: 3,059
Joined: Feb 09, 2017
 

Re: Kings/Pistons 

Post#4 » by BoogieTime » Sat May 3, 2025 1:36 am

Ivey is a sg, what is the position of need
Kalamazoo317
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,322
And1: 2,289
Joined: Nov 23, 2018
   

Re: Kings/Pistons 

Post#5 » by Kalamazoo317 » Sat May 3, 2025 3:12 am

No to Lavine, just because his contract kills any flexibility by itself. I'd rather see what Ivey can add next season for way less expense. And Harris is way too important to the current iteration of this team to throw in for less than a true all-star level player (Lavine has that one all-star nod but he's borderline there at best).
User avatar
Mr Peanut
Analyst
Posts: 3,303
And1: 3,869
Joined: Jan 29, 2012
Location: New Zealand
 

Re: Kings/Pistons 

Post#6 » by Mr Peanut » Sun May 4, 2025 12:40 pm

Seems the Pistons can never escape the LaVine trade proposals no matter what team's he on.
User avatar
longfellow44
Head Coach
Posts: 6,023
And1: 236
Joined: May 04, 2007
Location: Washinton DC

Re: Kings/Pistons 

Post#7 » by longfellow44 » Sun May 4, 2025 4:48 pm

BoogieTime wrote:Ivey is a sg, what is the position of need

He isn't at a position of need. In fact I think Ivey and Monk are rather similar.


This isn't the trade where the kings should be moving Keegan. I like the idea of adding harris but it should be adding harris with Keegan still on the roster.
Kalamazoo317
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,322
And1: 2,289
Joined: Nov 23, 2018
   

Re: Kings/Pistons 

Post#8 » by Kalamazoo317 » Sun May 4, 2025 8:00 pm

I can't think of anything y'all would have to offer that would make us want to send Tobias your way.

Return to Trades and Transactions