Diop wrote:Transition to Queens
?
Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger
Diop wrote:Transition to Queens
BoogieTime wrote:codydaze wrote:Pattycakes wrote:
Blazers have some assets to make a run at Sabonis if both sides want to tango
I honestly think Portland is the ideal place for him to land if we do end up moving him. I think you have the right kinds of pieces that would complement his game well.
would they have the right kinds of pieces to move the team forward on the court in a trade, given we are competing?
giberish wrote:
Agreed. Murray' s a bad contract at this point. He's effectively out for next season (if back midseason he'll be at less than 100% recovering from a major injury) and he hasn't really been that good when healthy the past few years. Herb Jones is nice and on a good value contract but he's not worth multiple lottery picks.
Murray/Jones for filler is about right, depending on the filler. Even than I don't really like them as targets for Sacramento as they can just play Ellis more and get a lot of what Jones brings.
codydaze wrote:BoogieTime wrote:codydaze wrote:
I honestly think Portland is the ideal place for him to land if we do end up moving him. I think you have the right kinds of pieces that would complement his game well.
would they have the right kinds of pieces to move the team forward on the court in a trade, given we are competing?
Well if Sabonis is moved, I would assume the plan at that point would be to rebuild. At least I hope it would. Not saying we move him but I would imagine the package to be something around Ayton, a young guy and picks. Maybe Sharpe as the young guy? Not sure who Portland would be willing to add. I'd probably prefer Grant/Clingan but imagine it's more likely to be for Ayton.
BoogieTime wrote:codydaze wrote:BoogieTime wrote:
would they have the right kinds of pieces to move the team forward on the court in a trade, given we are competing?
Well if Sabonis is moved, I would assume the plan at that point would be to rebuild. At least I hope it would. Not saying we move him but I would imagine the package to be something around Ayton, a young guy and picks. Maybe Sharpe as the young guy? Not sure who Portland would be willing to add. I'd probably prefer Grant/Clingan but imagine it's more likely to be for Ayton.
Its documented we aren't rebuilding now, we'll see what happens in the future.. Is there a point of no return, given the pro competing voices of both the average kings fan and the owner? Things would have to be south over the long haul, but the team was just put together with a new coach
codydaze wrote:BoogieTime wrote:codydaze wrote:
Well if Sabonis is moved, I would assume the plan at that point would be to rebuild. At least I hope it would. Not saying we move him but I would imagine the package to be something around Ayton, a young guy and picks. Maybe Sharpe as the young guy? Not sure who Portland would be willing to add. I'd probably prefer Grant/Clingan but imagine it's more likely to be for Ayton.
Its documented we aren't rebuilding now, we'll see what happens in the future.. Is there a point of no return, given the pro competing voices of both the average kings fan and the owner? Things would have to be south over the long haul, but the team was just put together with a new coach
What is the long haul though? If the Kings fall short of the playoffs again next year then how long of a leash are you expecting to give this roster? Next season Sabonis is 29, Lavine is 30 and Derozan is 36. The West is aging but so are we, there are only like three teams with a core older than ours in the conference (Denver who still has the best player in the world, Clippers who have an owner with deep pockets and a willingness to spend and the Warriors who will still have Steph). You can throw Dallas and Phoenix in there as well but we already finished above them in the standings this year so the point is kinda moot with them. Then you also have young teams like Portland and San Antonio who could very well pass us right on up with their youth continuing to develop.
Again, I understand the reporting has been we won't tear down, I just think it's a mistake. We have like a 2, maybe 3, year window of being a possible first round exit caliber team.
SacKingZZZ wrote:codydaze wrote:BoogieTime wrote:
Its documented we aren't rebuilding now, we'll see what happens in the future.. Is there a point of no return, given the pro competing voices of both the average kings fan and the owner? Things would have to be south over the long haul, but the team was just put together with a new coach
What is the long haul though? If the Kings fall short of the playoffs again next year then how long of a leash are you expecting to give this roster? Next season Sabonis is 29, Lavine is 30 and Derozan is 36. The West is aging but so are we, there are only like three teams with a core older than ours in the conference (Denver who still has the best player in the world, Clippers who have an owner with deep pockets and a willingness to spend and the Warriors who will still have Steph). You can throw Dallas and Phoenix in there as well but we already finished above them in the standings this year so the point is kinda moot with them. Then you also have young teams like Portland and San Antonio who could very well pass us right on up with their youth continuing to develop.
Again, I understand the reporting has been we won't tear down, I just think it's a mistake. We have like a 2, maybe 3, year window of being a possible first round exit caliber team.
We have to see what Domas does because he might end up wanting out this summer. It would be surprising to see DeMar on the roster heading into next season. If he does stay by the deadline next season if the Kings are a play in team this is getting blown the heck up. Even Vivek wouldn't keep going nowhere to that extent.
codydaze wrote:BoogieTime wrote:codydaze wrote:
Well if Sabonis is moved, I would assume the plan at that point would be to rebuild. At least I hope it would. Not saying we move him but I would imagine the package to be something around Ayton, a young guy and picks. Maybe Sharpe as the young guy? Not sure who Portland would be willing to add. I'd probably prefer Grant/Clingan but imagine it's more likely to be for Ayton.
Its documented we aren't rebuilding now, we'll see what happens in the future.. Is there a point of no return, given the pro competing voices of both the average kings fan and the owner? Things would have to be south over the long haul, but the team was just put together with a new coach
What is the long haul though? If the Kings fall short of the playoffs again next year then how long of a leash are you expecting to give this roster? Next season Sabonis is 29, Lavine is 30 and Derozan is 36. The West is aging but so are we, there are only like three teams with a core older than ours in the conference (Denver who still has the best player in the world, Clippers who have an owner with deep pockets and a willingness to spend and the Warriors who will still have Steph). You can throw Dallas and Phoenix in there as well but we already finished above them in the standings this year so the point is kinda moot with them. Then you also have young teams like Portland and San Antonio who could very well pass us right on up with their youth continuing to develop.
Again, I understand the reporting has been we won't tear down, I just think it's a mistake. We have like a 2, maybe 3, year window of being a possible first round exit caliber team.
Diop wrote:Transition to Queens
Andre Roberstan wrote:Diop wrote:Transition to Queens
We have a policy against contentless posts; if the joke were even about basketball, that might be fine, but it's not (and in poor taste).
Please confine yourself to the topic at hand.
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
Texas Chuck wrote:Kings badly overpaying for Murray there and Washington getting treated as a salary dump makes no sense and is just removing value from the deal as Dallas or Sacramento would assign value to having him.
Nets just sucking value out of the deal. I get they don't want Washington but that first is already an overpay for eating 1/$4M in Powell and 2/$12M in Hardy. Giving them Washington to flip on top of that is silly.
I hate that for the Kings on value and fit, think Dallas would want to add DeRozan differently than using Washington. Pels and Nets do this super quickly though.
LightTheBeam wrote:Texas Chuck wrote:Kings badly overpaying for Murray there and Washington getting treated as a salary dump makes no sense and is just removing value from the deal as Dallas or Sacramento would assign value to having him.
Nets just sucking value out of the deal. I get they don't want Washington but that first is already an overpay for eating 1/$4M in Powell and 2/$12M in Hardy. Giving them Washington to flip on top of that is silly.
I hate that for the Kings on value and fit, think Dallas would want to add DeRozan differently than using Washington. Pels and Nets do this super quickly though.
I remember our convo from a little while ago. At the time you were okay with moving Naji in a deal for Demar, and preferred to hold PJ. Did the end of season change your mindset on including Naji?
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
Texas Chuck wrote:LightTheBeam wrote:Texas Chuck wrote:Kings badly overpaying for Murray there and Washington getting treated as a salary dump makes no sense and is just removing value from the deal as Dallas or Sacramento would assign value to having him.
Nets just sucking value out of the deal. I get they don't want Washington but that first is already an overpay for eating 1/$4M in Powell and 2/$12M in Hardy. Giving them Washington to flip on top of that is silly.
I hate that for the Kings on value and fit, think Dallas would want to add DeRozan differently than using Washington. Pels and Nets do this super quickly though.
I remember our convo from a little while ago. At the time you were okay with moving Naji in a deal for Demar, and preferred to hold PJ. Did the end of season change your mindset on including Naji?
No, I would still include Marshall in a deal for DeRozan and would prefer to do that over Washington. But if Dallas was willing to do Washington for DeRozan I don't think the Kings would be cool with him just ending up in Brooklyn for free like that. They would want him.
Return to Trades and Transactions