Spurs-Sixers swap picks

obiwanginobili · Post #1 » by **obiwanginobili** » Tue May 13, 2025 1:07 am

Pretty simple idea - Harper doesnt make much sense with the spurs as they are currently constructed but would likely fit well next to Maxey.

Does #3 + McCain for #2 work value wise for both teams?

Post #2 » by **Texas Chuck** » Tue May 13, 2025 2:29 am

McCain was a fun story, but I don't think he gets you from 3 to 2. Unless the Spurs want Edgecombe or Bailey anyway and are willing to settle for a small sweetener.

Godaddycurse · Post #3 » by **Godaddycurse** » Tue May 13, 2025 2:29 am

probably need to add pick(s) on top

ReggiesKnicks · Post #4 » by **ReggiesKnicks** » Tue May 13, 2025 2:31 am

One of the best prospects in the past 6 years doesn't make sense with lesser prospects at his position, so the Spurs trade him for a smaller guard?

Chinook · Post #5 » by **Chinook** » Tue May 13, 2025 2:34 am

If the Spurs loved Bailey, this could work. The Spurs need a scoring guard off their bench. It's part of why moving down and drafting Tre Johnson could work if the incentive is strong enough. This is the most elegant way to do it.

PhillyNj · Post #6 » by **PhillyNj** » Tue May 13, 2025 5:22 am

obiwanginobili wrote:Pretty simple idea - Harper doesnt make much sense with the spurs as they are currently constructed but would likely fit well next to Maxey.

Does #3 + McCain for #2 work value wise for both teams?

Nope. Ace is a better fit in Philly. The Sixers aren’t trading assets to move up to get Harper. If he falls to three. Fine.

One_and_Done · Post #7 » by **One_and_Done** » Tue May 13, 2025 8:17 am

Spurs aren't doing this.