BRK-WAS-LAL-CHI

Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger

drchaos
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,454
And1: 547
Joined: Feb 01, 2019
       

BRK-WAS-LAL-CHI 

Post#1 » by drchaos » Thu May 22, 2025 12:00 pm

Four team deal to get the Nets some draft capital by solving problems for three other teams.

This one does work on the trade machine.

Not sure about the draft compensation on this one so I could use some feedback about what might make these teams happy or not.

Nets give

Nic Claxton (to Lakers)
Pick 8 (to Wizards)
Pick 26 (to Wizards)
Pick 27 (to Bulls)

Nets get

Jordan Poole (from Wizards)
Pick 6 (from Wizards)
Pick 12 (from Bulls)

Wizards give

Jordan Poole (to Nets)
Pick 6 (to Nets)

Wizards get

Patrick Williams (from Bulls)
Gave Vincent (from Lakers)
Pick 8 (from Nets)
Pick 26 (from Nets)
Lakers 2025 second round pick
Lakers 2031 first round pick (top 4 protected)

Lakers give

Rui Hachimura (to Bulls)
Gabe Vincent (to Wizards)
Lakers 2025 second round pick (to Wizards)
Lakers 2031 first round pick (top 4 protected, to Wizards)

Lakers get

Nic Claxton (from Nets)

Bulls give

Patrick Williams (to Wizards)
Pick 12 (to Nets)

Bulls get

Rui Hachimura (from Lakers)
Pick 27 (from Nets)

Nets add two million dollars of salary and roll the dice on Poole while consolidating assets, Wizards get off Poole and move down two spots for additional picks, Lakers get their man for a fair price, Bulls get off Williams and shave more than $1.5 mil off the cap.

Like I said I am not completely sure about the draft compensation but the Nets need to consolidate assets at some point and this deal seems to solve at least one problems for each of the other teams.
Mavrelous
Forum Mod - Mavericks
Forum Mod - Mavericks
Posts: 19,285
And1: 17,080
Joined: Aug 20, 2020

Re: BRK-WAS-LAL-CHI 

Post#2 » by Mavrelous » Thu May 22, 2025 12:19 pm

Wizards aren't looking to get off Poole, to the contrary, they are willing to add money on the books to improve their draft position.
If the Lakers are paying a 1st for Claxton, Vando is going out, not a positive value player like Rui.
Bulls part is fine, but I don't think you get Rui in the original deal.
Defense wins draft lotteries!
letsgobulls23
Pro Prospect
Posts: 824
And1: 563
Joined: May 22, 2017
       

Re: BRK-WAS-LAL-CHI 

Post#3 » by letsgobulls23 » Thu May 22, 2025 12:54 pm

CHI passes, makes no sense to burn the 12th pick to turn Pat into Rui, even when factoring in contracts.
User avatar
zimpy27
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 45,368
And1: 43,432
Joined: Jul 13, 2014

Re: BRK-WAS-LAL-CHI 

Post#4 » by zimpy27 » Thu May 22, 2025 1:09 pm

Vando+Kleber+Knecht+LAL31FRP(top 10 protected)

For

Claxton
"Let's play some basketball!" - Fergie
ChettheJet
General Manager
Posts: 7,961
And1: 2,360
Joined: Jul 02, 2014
       

Re: BRK-WAS-LAL-CHI 

Post#5 » by ChettheJet » Thu May 22, 2025 1:52 pm

You can omit the Bulls. It's not like Hachimura is the huge difference maker you want him to be to rationalize this.He's a PF, they have Buzelis already as a PF, where 's the sense to this? The Bulls have never acted like they're so fed up with their move to sign Williams to that contract that they'd pay to get rid of him. And dropping fro #12 to #27 is a high price to pay for a team that is short on young assets.
Slava
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 61,128
And1: 33,799
Joined: Oct 15, 2006
     

Re: BRK-WAS-LAL-CHI 

Post#6 » by Slava » Thu May 22, 2025 2:15 pm

zimpy27 wrote:Vando+Kleber+Knecht+LAL31FRP(top 10 protected)

For

Claxton


I reckon Pelinka would rather have kept Mark Williams despite his medical instead of surrendering it for Claxton.
:king: + :angry: = :wizard:
JKiddy
Starter
Posts: 2,229
And1: 490
Joined: Jul 28, 2002

Re: BRK-WAS-LAL-CHI 

Post#7 » by JKiddy » Thu May 22, 2025 3:21 pm

Yeah Pelinka is that dumb. You are right.
ReggiesKnicks
Veteran
Posts: 2,747
And1: 2,269
Joined: Jan 25, 2025
   

Re: BRK-WAS-LAL-CHI 

Post#8 » by ReggiesKnicks » Thu May 22, 2025 3:23 pm

Massive overpay for Claxton. What makes him more valuable than Rui?
drchaos
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,454
And1: 547
Joined: Feb 01, 2019
       

Re: BRK-WAS-LAL-CHI 

Post#9 » by drchaos » Thu May 22, 2025 3:42 pm

ChettheJet wrote:You can omit the Bulls. It's not like Hachimura is the huge difference maker you want him to be to rationalize this.He's a PF, they have Buzelis already as a PF, where 's the sense to this? The Bulls have never acted like they're so fed up with their move to sign Williams to that contract that they'd pay to get rid of him. And dropping fro #12 to #27 is a high price to pay for a team that is short on young assets.


Rui has a much shorter contract that Pat.

Also, the Bulls shave money of the cap now ($1.5 mil on the swap as well as the difference in rookie contract from 12 vs 27).

The Bulls are paying for cap relief here.

I included them because I believed that they wanted cap relief to achieve larger goals.
drchaos
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,454
And1: 547
Joined: Feb 01, 2019
       

Re: BRK-WAS-LAL-CHI 

Post#10 » by drchaos » Thu May 22, 2025 3:43 pm

Slava wrote:
zimpy27 wrote:Vando+Kleber+Knecht+LAL31FRP(top 10 protected)

For

Claxton


I reckon Pelinka would rather have kept Mark Williams despite his medical instead of surrendering it for Claxton.


Say what you want about Claxton but he has been relatively healthy and is tough.
User avatar
Texas Chuck
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 92,329
And1: 98,143
Joined: May 19, 2012
Location: Purgatory
   

Re: BRK-WAS-LAL-CHI 

Post#11 » by Texas Chuck » Thu May 22, 2025 3:45 pm

ReggiesKnicks wrote:Massive overpay for Claxton. What makes him more valuable than Rui?


Nothing. I'd have him less.

Also this deal is just way too complicated. Start with a singular idea and concentrate on it. Sounds like it is moving up in the draft for the Nets. Identify a team possibly willing to move down and make that offer.

This has so many moving parts. Hard to get 2 teams to agree.
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
drchaos
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,454
And1: 547
Joined: Feb 01, 2019
       

Re: BRK-WAS-LAL-CHI 

Post#12 » by drchaos » Thu May 22, 2025 3:47 pm

Mavrelous wrote:Wizards aren't looking to get off Poole, to the contrary, they are willing to add money on the books to improve their draft position.
If the Lakers are paying a 1st for Claxton, Vando is going out, not a positive value player like Rui.
Bulls part is fine, but I don't think you get Rui in the original deal.


The genesis of this trade idea was the thought that the Nets could take on Poole and the Wizards could take on a bigger contract (Beal, George, etc.) and that both teams could get paid by whoever is unloading the bad contract.

I wasn't really sure if swapping Poole for Pat Williams was all that good or bad for the Wizards so I gave them the Lakers pick and some other assets for moving down two spots from 4 to 6.
Slava
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 61,128
And1: 33,799
Joined: Oct 15, 2006
     

Re: BRK-WAS-LAL-CHI 

Post#13 » by Slava » Thu May 22, 2025 4:31 pm

drchaos wrote:
Slava wrote:
zimpy27 wrote:Vando+Kleber+Knecht+LAL31FRP(top 10 protected)

For

Claxton


I reckon Pelinka would rather have kept Mark Williams despite his medical instead of surrendering it for Claxton.


Say what you want about Claxton but he has been relatively healthy and is tough.


That’s the thing though. Atleast with Mark Williams, there’s the tantalizing prospect of him becoming more healthy and growing on defense because his physical tools are unreal. With Claxton, you know what you get and that’s not worth what’s being offered here.
:king: + :angry: = :wizard:
ecuhus1981
RealGM
Posts: 16,899
And1: 1,572
Joined: Jun 19, 2007
       

Re: BRK-WAS-LAL-CHI 

Post#14 » by ecuhus1981 » Thu May 22, 2025 10:08 pm

Yeah, I'm not a fan of this for Brooklyn, and it's too complicated compared to how little actually meaningfully changes for these teams post trade.
Some people really have a way with words. Other people... not... have... way.
-- Steve Martin
Dez
General Manager
Posts: 7,652
And1: 9,207
Joined: Jul 23, 2011
Location: Melbourne, Australia
 

Re: BRK-WAS-LAL-CHI 

Post#15 » by Dez » Thu May 22, 2025 11:33 pm

drchaos wrote:
ChettheJet wrote:You can omit the Bulls. It's not like Hachimura is the huge difference maker you want him to be to rationalize this.He's a PF, they have Buzelis already as a PF, where 's the sense to this? The Bulls have never acted like they're so fed up with their move to sign Williams to that contract that they'd pay to get rid of him. And dropping fro #12 to #27 is a high price to pay for a team that is short on young assets.


Rui has a much shorter contract that Pat.

Also, the Bulls shave money of the cap now ($1.5 mil on the swap as well as the difference in rookie contract from 12 vs 27).

The Bulls are paying for cap relief here.

I included them because I believed that they wanted cap relief to achieve larger goals.


We don't need to pay for cap relief, it's a no from Chicago.
Karmaloop
General Manager
Posts: 9,669
And1: 1,770
Joined: Sep 24, 2009
       

Re: BRK-WAS-LAL-CHI 

Post#16 » by Karmaloop » Fri May 23, 2025 12:43 am

Claxton doesn't have nearly this much value. 8+26+27 probably gets you to 6 plus some change, but Claxton isn't worth a top 14 pick by any means.

Return to Trades and Transactions