Texas Chuck wrote:Godaddycurse wrote:ReggiesKnicks wrote:
They traded for Quentin Grimes though.
Grimes had no value coming off a really bad year w/ NYK and Detroit IIRC
I don't think that was the belief at the time. In fact in discussions on this board when we talked about that very trade before it happened, the most common position was that Dallas owed a first. I don't remember your position but I remember getting a lot of push back when I would say Grimes was nothing special. Now I was happy with the actual trade where Dallas gave up minor assets and saved money while getting a playable guard back.
But we didn't perceive him as worthless a year ago. His perceived value as a player has certainly gone up since that, but it wasn't starting as worthless.
The revisionist history is interesting here. Here is the thread from then (just learned about the search function, user friendly!).
mademan wrote:Wow. Didnt even have to come up off a 1st
Texas Chuck wrote:Yeah I'm way lower on Grimes than most, but even if he's barely a rotation guy, considering what salary dumps were going for yesterday this is a real win for Dallas. And if Grimes can compete with Josh Green for minutes even better.
kobe_vs_jordan wrote:Detroit be saving teams for the low lol
K_chile22 wrote:I understand the 25 Toronto second could be a good second but 3 seconds to dump Reggie's contract a bit over $5M and also 3 seconds to dump the $12M salary difference here and also get grimes who is at least worth something. Detroit continues to take on salary dumps for poor value
jayjaysee wrote:I begged for Grimes, but thought it would cost more than 2nds.