Spurs and Nets

[wemby]

Using Claxton top move up to 2? Is this trolling? I haven't laughed this much since the Schroder trade thread.

[JKiddy]

I can see this.

Fox
Fears
Vassell
Claxton
Wemby

They would have plenty of players who would want to join them. I can see them rounding out the roster at the draft and FA and becoming a legit threat in the West this season if they did this.

[wemby]

I can see this.

Fox
Fears
Vassell
Claxton
Wemby

They would have plenty of players who would want to join them. I can see them rounding out the roster at the draft and FA and becoming a legit threat in the West this season if they did this.

This makes no sense, even in the hypothetical Spurs were willing to move from Harper, it wouldn't be for Claxton, and sure as hell not to draft Fears and play him over Castle either. Outlandish stuff.

[Texas Chuck]

Using Claxton top move up to 2? Is this trolling? I haven't laughed this much since the Schroder trade thread.

Its obvious it isn't. It just a big miss on value. A response like this? Is just trolling because its done with intent. You didn't intend to contribute but rather just mock and belittle.

[wemby]

Using Claxton top move up to 2? Is this trolling? I haven't laughed this much since the Schroder trade thread.

Its obvious it isn't. It just a big miss on value. A response like this? Is just trolling because its done with intent. You didn't intend to contribute but rather just mock and belittle.

Whenever I think a post is serious, even if off, I clearly state reasons, usually in detail. What would your reply be if I post a thread proposing Spurs move up to 1 using Keldon Johnson? This is the equivalent here.

[Texas Chuck]

Using Claxton top move up to 2? Is this trolling? I haven't laughed this much since the Schroder trade thread.

Its obvious it isn't. It just a big miss on value. A response like this? Is just trolling because its done with intent. You didn't intend to contribute but rather just mock and belittle.

Whenever I think a post is serious, even if off, I clearly state reasons, usually in detail. What would your reply be if I post a thread proposing Spurs move up to 1 using Keldon Johnson? This is the equivalent here.

I treat posts on their intent. You would be intentionally trolling and I would treat it as such. And you know this. The OP just missed. Yes, they missed big. But thats how we learn.

[wemby]

Its obvious it isn't. It just a big miss on value. A response like this? Is just trolling because its done with intent. You didn't intend to contribute but rather just mock and belittle.

Whenever I think a post is serious, even if off, I clearly state reasons, usually in detail. What would your reply be if I post a thread proposing Spurs move up to 1 using Keldon Johnson? This is the equivalent here.

I treat posts on their intent. You would be intentionally trolling and I would treat it as such. And you know this. The OP just missed. Yes, they missed big. But thats how we learn.

So that's the issue, you assume intent therefore everything I post will be judged in a different way as if someone else did. The definition of bias. Thank you for coming clean.

[Texas Chuck]

Whenever I think a post is serious, even if off, I clearly state reasons, usually in detail. What would your reply be if I post a thread proposing Spurs move up to 1 using Keldon Johnson? This is the equivalent here.

I treat posts on their intent. You would be intentionally trolling and I would treat it as such. And you know this. The OP just missed. Yes, they missed big. But thats how we learn.

So that's the issue, you assume intent therefore everything I post will be judged in a different way as if someone else did. The definition of bias. Thank you for coming clean.

Yes I am admitting you are an intelligent poster who knows that Keldon Johnson doesn't move you up to 1. The horrors.....Pay a man a compliment and he still rushes to play victim. Sigh. You take zero responsibility for your own actions. Just mean Chuck asking you to contribute when you post. That's all I did lol.

None of this is necessary. Just review you own post. Does this contribute anything positive? No, so add some content or just say this deal is so bad its not worth my time. But you chose to just mock and then when reminded that's not helpful, played victim for some weird reason.

Most of your posts contribute. But too many of them don't. Just excise those and you won't hear from me in any moderation capacity. Your call.

[One_and_Done]

Spurs/Nets
Spurs trade Johnson/filler and #2
Nets trade Claxton and #8

Nets take Harper at 2 and start a rebuild.
Spurs take Maluach at 8 and McNeeley at 14. Allows Wemby to play either PF or center.

Spurs are never doing this.

[louc1970]

Spurs/Nets
Spurs trade Johnson/filler and #2
Nets trade Claxton and #8

Nets take Harper at 2 and start a rebuild.
Spurs take Maluach at 8 and McNeeley at 14. Allows Wemby to play either PF or center.

Spurs are never doing this.

Show me a trade on here a team has done.

[Texas Chuck]

Spurs/Nets
Spurs trade Johnson/filler and #2
Nets trade Claxton and #8

Nets take Harper at 2 and start a rebuild.
Spurs take Maluach at 8 and McNeeley at 14. Allows Wemby to play either PF or center.

Spurs are never doing this.

Show me a trade on here a team has done.

We've actually had quite a few posters nail trades near as exact.

But Claxton simply doesn't have the value you've assigned him. You can be mad about that I guess, but its not going to change the value.