Boston-Sacramento

Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger

Mamba4Goat
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 11,767
And1: 8,071
Joined: Dec 13, 2013
     

Boston-Sacramento 

Post#1 » by Mamba4Goat » Mon Jun 9, 2025 8:10 am

I apologize if this has been done before.

Kings send: DeMar Derozan, Terence Davis
Celtics send: Jrue Holiday

(Optionally, team 3 takes Davis on for a 2nd or cash)

Why for Sacramento? They get a mentor for Carter as well as a better fit for the team. Jrue could transform their defense and make the offense less iso heavy.

Why for Boston? They save money and put a bandaid on the offense while Tatum recovers.
Rest in peace Mamba. There'll never be another Kobe.
Astaluego
Starter
Posts: 2,393
And1: 907
Joined: May 02, 2020
   

Re: Boston-Sacramento 

Post#2 » by Astaluego » Mon Jun 9, 2025 10:36 am

Mamba4Goat wrote:I apologize if this has been done before.

Kings send: DeMar Derozan, Terence Davis
Celtics send: Jrue Holiday

(Optionally, team 3 takes Davis on for a 2nd or cash)

Why for Sacramento? They get a mentor for Carter as well as a better fit for the team. Jrue could transform their defense and make the offense less iso heavy.

Why for Boston? They save money and put a bandaid on the offense while Tatum recovers.
Maybe the Clippers will take Demar?

Bogdan/Eubanks/Brown
Boston can redirect Eubanks and Brown along with some SRP and still save the money.
even..Bogdan for KCP?

DDR CLIPPERS

Jrue KINGS
Old Mike Lorenzo
hugepatsfan
General Manager
Posts: 8,817
And1: 9,238
Joined: May 28, 2020
       

Re: Boston-Sacramento 

Post#3 » by hugepatsfan » Mon Jun 9, 2025 11:34 am

Celtics need to clear $24M to duck 2nd apron. They need to clear $44M to duck the tax altogether.

I think the only way they go through the trouble of dealing Jrue is to duck the tax altogether. To do that, they have to move Jrue/Porzingis/Hauser for a combined total of about $28m back.

DDR at $24.75M is probably too much to make the math math on that. If he’s on their books, they’re probably a tax team unless they attach crazy assets to clear Porzingis almost entirely. They can probably get below the 2nd apron pretty painlessly dealing Porzingis and Hauser. Unless a Jrue deal takes them below the tax, not worth it. They’d rather pay tax on Jrue who they love and is still really good than DDR.

So this needs a follow up to move DDR elsewhere or it won’t work.
Djh7475
Rookie
Posts: 1,012
And1: 452
Joined: Jul 27, 2016

Re: Boston-Sacramento 

Post#4 » by Djh7475 » Mon Jun 9, 2025 12:56 pm

hugepatsfan wrote:Celtics need to clear $24M to duck 2nd apron. They need to clear $44M to duck the tax altogether.

I think the only way they go through the trouble of dealing Jrue is to duck the tax altogether. To do that, they have to move Jrue/Porzingis/Hauser for a combined total of about $28m back.

DDR at $24.75M is probably too much to make the math math on that. If he’s on their books, they’re probably a tax team unless they attach crazy assets to clear Porzingis almost entirely. They can probably get below the 2nd apron pretty painlessly dealing Porzingis and Hauser. Unless a Jrue deal takes them below the tax, not worth it. They’d rather pay tax on Jrue who they love and is still really good than DDR.

So this needs a follow up to move DDR elsewhere or it won’t work.


You said it so that I don’t have to. Thanks for saving me some time.
brackdan70
RealGM
Posts: 17,921
And1: 12,684
Joined: Jul 15, 2013
Location: Ogden, UT
   

Re: Boston-Sacramento 

Post#5 » by brackdan70 » Mon Jun 9, 2025 1:35 pm

Djh7475 wrote:
hugepatsfan wrote:Celtics need to clear $24M to duck 2nd apron. They need to clear $44M to duck the tax altogether.

I think the only way they go through the trouble of dealing Jrue is to duck the tax altogether. To do that, they have to move Jrue/Porzingis/Hauser for a combined total of about $28m back.

DDR at $24.75M is probably too much to make the math math on that. If he’s on their books, they’re probably a tax team unless they attach crazy assets to clear Porzingis almost entirely. They can probably get below the 2nd apron pretty painlessly dealing Porzingis and Hauser. Unless a Jrue deal takes them below the tax, not worth it. They’d rather pay tax on Jrue who they love and is still really good than DDR.

So this needs a follow up to move DDR elsewhere or it won’t work.


You said it so that I don’t have to. Thanks for saving me some time.

According to Hoopshype DDRs 26/27 contract is only partially guaranteed (10m). If this is actually the case it’s a palpable deal as they can get under the tax in 26/27.
I personally think there will be better Jrue deals out there still.
It’s a pipe dream imo to think the Celtics will even to try to duck the Apron this year.
Jordan Walsh > Lonnie Walker
facothomas22
Analyst
Posts: 3,698
And1: 2,177
Joined: Jul 02, 2018
   

Re: Boston-Sacramento 

Post#6 » by facothomas22 » Mon Jun 9, 2025 2:47 pm

The Celtics aren't this doing this. Demar Derozen is not a winning player and a awful fit for the Celtics and while they clear salary, it's not nearly enough. As others said, Demar going to have to be rerouted to a 3rd team or it's simply isn't going to work.
User avatar
Texas Chuck
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 92,284
And1: 98,052
Joined: May 19, 2012
Location: Purgatory
   

Re: Boston-Sacramento 

Post#7 » by Texas Chuck » Mon Jun 9, 2025 4:55 pm

I don't think this is the deal, but I don't think I agree with the idea that Boston only trades Jrue if they end up out of the tax altogether this off-season.
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
djFan71
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 13,987
And1: 20,151
Joined: Jul 24, 2010
 

Re: Boston-Sacramento 

Post#8 » by djFan71 » Mon Jun 9, 2025 5:56 pm

Texas Chuck wrote:I don't think this is the deal, but I don't think I agree with the idea that Boston only trades Jrue if they end up out of the tax altogether this off-season.

Same. The decline is basically the same reason - not enough savings or young guy BOS wants going forward coming back. But, there are plenty of trade Jrue scenarios where you end up under the 2nd apron, but still in some amount of tax. I think something in the first 2 brackets is feasible for the right set of players.
BigGargamel
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,159
And1: 10,827
Joined: Jan 28, 2020
Contact:
     

Re: Boston-Sacramento 

Post#9 » by BigGargamel » Mon Jun 9, 2025 7:37 pm

hugepatsfan wrote:Celtics need to clear $24M to duck 2nd apron. They need to clear $44M to duck the tax altogether.

I think the only way they go through the trouble of dealing Jrue is to duck the tax altogether. To do that, they have to move Jrue/Porzingis/Hauser for a combined total of about $28m back.

DDR at $24.75M is probably too much to make the math math on that. If he’s on their books, they’re probably a tax team unless they attach crazy assets to clear Porzingis almost entirely. They can probably get below the 2nd apron pretty painlessly dealing Porzingis and Hauser. Unless a Jrue deal takes them below the tax, not worth it. They’d rather pay tax on Jrue who they love and is still really good than DDR.

So this needs a follow up to move DDR elsewhere or it won’t work.


On point. With the Tatum injury, I think Boston accepts a soft punt of the 2025-2026 season, saves some tax money, then retools a bit for the following year.

Return to Trades and Transactions