Bos/Cle/Bkn: Jrue, Garland, #8

Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger

User avatar
Texas Chuck
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 92,284
And1: 98,052
Joined: May 19, 2012
Location: Purgatory
   

Re: Bos/Cle/Bkn: Jrue, Garland, #8 

Post#41 » by Texas Chuck » Wed Jun 11, 2025 5:02 pm

Netaman wrote:also cap sheets has Atlanta's TPE at $25m, the biggest league wide by far (second is Lavine's TPE in chicago at 17m). so if we are talking about accepting either of Jrue or KP into cap space, or a megaworld were Boston so inclined both of them, im pretty sure the Nets are in fact the only game in town without getting very complicated multi-team?


Yes if we are overly restrictive to a deal in which Boston wants to send out KP and Jrue and take back no salary at all, the Nets are the only game in town.

They don't need to do that though so....
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
Djh7475
Rookie
Posts: 1,012
And1: 452
Joined: Jul 27, 2016

Re: Bos/Cle/Bkn: Jrue, Garland, #8 

Post#42 » by Djh7475 » Wed Jun 11, 2025 5:03 pm

It’s hard to put an exact value on Jrue (fans seem to like him much less than I expect front offices would), but if the Celtics can wipe his contract off the books without including any asset, they do it. It drastically simplifies getting/staying below the 2nd apron and makes a path to getting out of the tax altogether more feasible.
BK_2020
RealGM
Posts: 16,952
And1: 15,691
Joined: Sep 08, 2020
 

Re: Bos/Cle/Bkn: Jrue, Garland, #8 

Post#43 » by BK_2020 » Wed Jun 11, 2025 5:18 pm

Deleting Jrue's salary won't accomplish much for Boston in terms of the big picture. They may dip under the tax but will have 5 rotation players including Porzingis who may not come back in the 26-27 season. So what do they do for 26-27? Add a guy with the MLE and you have Tatum, Brown, White, Pritchard, plus a Josh Okogie or something. That's not a contending team.

While getting under the tax, they also need to break up their big salaries into a bunch of small salaries and get draft assets. Spend the next 2 years finding and developing cost-controlled rotation players. That's the only way they can contend from 27-28 to whenever Tatum begins to suck.
JKiddy
Starter
Posts: 2,226
And1: 490
Joined: Jul 28, 2002

Re: Bos/Cle/Bkn: Jrue, Garland, #8 

Post#44 » by JKiddy » Wed Jun 11, 2025 5:28 pm

How serious is Garland's injury? I cannot see any team trading for him until he is months out of surgery and progressing in rehab.
jbk1234
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 58,702
And1: 35,759
Joined: Dec 22, 2010
 

Re: Bos/Cle/Bkn: Jrue, Garland, #8 

Post#45 » by jbk1234 » Wed Jun 11, 2025 5:35 pm

JKiddy wrote:How serious is Garland's injury? I cannot see any team trading for him until he is months out of surgery and progressing in rehab.


It's not serious in the sense that he's expected to make a full recovery. It is serious in the sense that he won't be able to pass a physical before July 1st or the draft. It's difficult to see a trade before the season starts, and it will be much harder to execute once it has.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
JKiddy
Starter
Posts: 2,226
And1: 490
Joined: Jul 28, 2002

Re: Bos/Cle/Bkn: Jrue, Garland, #8 

Post#46 » by JKiddy » Wed Jun 11, 2025 5:48 pm

The Nets likely won't trade for an injured player. They especially won't give up their first lotto pick in FOREVER for them if his name is not Giannis or Luka.
User avatar
Netaman
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,259
And1: 1,319
Joined: Jun 04, 2004

Re: Bos/Cle/Bkn: Jrue, Garland, #8 

Post#47 » by Netaman » Wed Jun 11, 2025 6:38 pm

Texas Chuck wrote:
Netaman wrote:also cap sheets has Atlanta's TPE at $25m, the biggest league wide by far (second is Lavine's TPE in chicago at 17m). so if we are talking about accepting either of Jrue or KP into cap space, or a megaworld were Boston so inclined both of them, im pretty sure the Nets are in fact the only game in town without getting very complicated multi-team?


Yes if we are overly restrictive to a deal in which Boston wants to send out KP and Jrue and take back no salary at all, the Nets are the only game in town.

They don't need to do that though so....


of course they don't need to do that, but surely you can agree that it is obviously a lot simpler for them, and positive value, to do so. wake up tomorrow and KP is gone with a nice 30m TPE sitting there that they can use next offseason when Tatum is due back, plus a bunch of cash saved, for an injury prone expiring player unlikely to bring much back beyond salary match?

they can keep Jrue until a deal worth doing comes along, same with Hauser. No need to include assets to move anyone else. that seems clearly worth more than some 2nds to me (which would be a nonstarter for nets since they have a boatload of them).

im partial to believing that most trades fall into a range where it's not quite a no brainer for either team. If Boston had on the table a pure KP dump into cap space to the nets for a lotto protected 2027 FRP, i think they'd have to consider that. Best case they are back to being a playoff team and weren't forced to move anyone they didn't want to. And converted a late first into a big TPE they can use in June 2026 but not pay tax on in 2025 for a lot of $ savings. It is almost certain they'd be able to use that TPE to take on a player similar to KP right now. Worst case they end up lotto again and pick moves forward to another year when they are back in playoffs.

heck i could see the nets being willing to trade one of their late firsts this year to get more favorable protections, in which case Boston may not even be "trading down" by much with the 2027 pick they give up if they are willing to take some risk. With Tatum back they could easily be picking #26/27 in 2027 and they got 2 extra dev years from a player in this year's class. mid-20's firsts aren't that valuable so i could see the nets not having much problem kicking one in since they are highly unlikely to roster 5 rookies this year, and also why i could see the celtics being willing to entertain trading a 2 years out likely-20's protected first to save a boatload of money all at once vs a bunch of less clean deals swapping contracts.
bgrep14
Analyst
Posts: 3,016
And1: 290
Joined: Jun 14, 2009

Re: Bos/Cle/Bkn: Jrue, Garland, #8 

Post#48 » by bgrep14 » Wed Jun 11, 2025 7:28 pm

I still think the best Garland trade is just a two part with Brooklyn

Part 1: TPE for Okoro

Part 2: Garland for Johnson, 8, and whatever Knicks future first they want to give.
hugepatsfan
General Manager
Posts: 8,817
And1: 9,238
Joined: May 28, 2020
       

Re: Bos/Cle/Bkn: Jrue, Garland, #8 

Post#49 » by hugepatsfan » Wed Jun 11, 2025 7:49 pm

BK_2020 wrote:Deleting Jrue's salary won't accomplish much for Boston in terms of the big picture. They may dip under the tax but will have 5 rotation players including Porzingis who may not come back in the 26-27 season. So what do they do for 26-27? Add a guy with the MLE and you have Tatum, Brown, White, Pritchard, plus a Josh Okogie or something. That's not a contending team.

While getting under the tax, they also need to break up their big salaries into a bunch of small salaries and get draft assets. Spend the next 2 years finding and developing cost-controlled rotation players. That's the only way they can contend from 27-28 to whenever Tatum begins to suck.


They would create a TPE here that they can use. Think about how it's a real possibility that we end up dumping Hauser into a TPE/MLE for some 2nds or even just for nothing but savings... next year if they had a Holiday-sized TPE they could be the team acquiring those type of guys. I think with the new apron penalties there will always be some opportunity like that.
jbk1234
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 58,702
And1: 35,759
Joined: Dec 22, 2010
 

Re: Bos/Cle/Bkn: Jrue, Garland, #8 

Post#50 » by jbk1234 » Wed Jun 11, 2025 10:58 pm

bgrep14 wrote:I still think the best Garland trade is just a two part with Brooklyn

Part 1: TPE for Okoro

Part 2: Garland for Johnson, 8, and whatever Knicks future first they want to give.


If you're trading Garland for Cam, you probably want to hold onto Okoro.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.

Return to Trades and Transactions