What should the Bucks plan be?

Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger

Which path should Mil choose?

Keep Giannis, plan for 2026-7
14
35%
Keep Giannis, full win right now
11
28%
Trade Giannis, get picks back, tank
9
23%
Trade Giannis, build with youth/extra picks without tanking
6
15%
 
Total votes: 40

giberish
RealGM
Posts: 17,360
And1: 7,113
Joined: Mar 30, 2006
Location: Whereever you go - there you are

What should the Bucks plan be? 

Post#1 » by giberish » Fri Jun 20, 2025 3:09 am

While obviously trade Giannis/don't trade Giannis is the big offseason decision for the Bucks, I see four main paths for the team to take going forward:

1) Keep Giannis. Acknowledge that with Lillard out for the year next season isn't going to be that good. Try to patch together something that works for 2026-7 and 2027-8 hoping Lillard can fully return to form.

2) Keep Giannis. Throw everything into winning now as much as possible.

3) Trade Giannis. Get control of at least your next two 1sts (or ideally more) and do a classic tank (and hopefully rebuild around the lotto pics and some extra youth/prospects received in the Giannis deal).

4) Trade Giannis. Figure the lost picks are a sunk cost and don't lose major assets getting them back. Instead look to get enough of an immediate haul of youth/prospects/depth to be at least somewhat competitive (play-in competitive not title competitive) then improve with extra picks going forward.
User avatar
Texas Chuck
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 92,284
And1: 98,052
Joined: May 19, 2012
Location: Purgatory
   

Re: What should the Bucks plan be? 

Post#2 » by Texas Chuck » Fri Jun 20, 2025 3:28 am

doesn't matter what it should be. It's going to be keep Giannis. Try and work around the edges as best you can for a year and then see where you are with Dame next off-season.

He has to demand out to move him. You don't preemptively trade him.
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
JustBuzzin
RealGM
Posts: 16,078
And1: 13,639
Joined: Jun 10, 2023
 

Re: What should the Bucks plan be? 

Post#3 » by JustBuzzin » Fri Jun 20, 2025 3:59 am

Not much they can do tbh

Maybe trying to trade that Dame contract for a Paul George or Bradley Beal?
User avatar
zimpy27
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 45,322
And1: 43,333
Joined: Jul 13, 2014

Re: What should the Bucks plan be? 

Post#4 » by zimpy27 » Fri Jun 20, 2025 4:02 am

Keep Giannis, use exceptions under 1st apron, get new coach

0) Replace Doc with Thibs
1) resign Portis
2) use MLE partially on GTJ ($9m)
3) use BAE and rest of MLE on 2 $5m players
4) fill vet min until 14 players
5) play the season and wait for Lillard to return by playoffs
"Let's play some basketball!" - Fergie
facothomas22
Analyst
Posts: 3,698
And1: 2,178
Joined: Jul 02, 2018
   

Re: What should the Bucks plan be? 

Post#5 » by facothomas22 » Fri Jun 20, 2025 4:11 am

They are more or less stuck,unless they decide to to pull a Nico Harrison and decide to trade Giannis without letting him know(hopefully they actually get equal value unlike that other trade). They simply don't have the assets or cap space to improve the roster around Giannis.
User avatar
JayMKE
RealGM
Posts: 29,209
And1: 17,018
Joined: Jun 21, 2010
Location: LA
     

Re: What should the Bucks plan be? 

Post#6 » by JayMKE » Fri Jun 20, 2025 10:08 am

People talk out their ass about the Bucks situation for own their ends. Bucks keep Giannis no matter what, if there is a good deal this year then do it but not if the only guys available are old replacement level players making the max like Brad Beal and Paul George.

Bucks are a way better team if they just fire Doc
FREE GIANNIS
DoItALL9
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,906
And1: 1,326
Joined: Oct 08, 2016
       

Re: What should the Bucks plan be? 

Post#7 » by DoItALL9 » Sat Jun 21, 2025 5:26 am

Can Giannis convince Bradley Beal to come to Milwaukee?

Bradley Beal for Damian Lillard would be a nice pairing.
User avatar
LarsV8
RealGM
Posts: 10,120
And1: 5,407
Joined: Dec 13, 2009
       

Re: What should the Bucks plan be? 

Post#8 » by LarsV8 » Sat Jun 21, 2025 5:09 pm

They have no path forward competitively, and have already overleveraged thier future.

They have a get out jail free card right now, and a decent hand they could play, to get ahead in the next era of Bucks ball, but there is a shelf life on that.

If they aren't careful and hold on too long, or worse, leverage even more of the future, there is a serious threat of an extended period of not just irrelevance, but downright hopelessness.

If it were me, I would tear it down in a strategic rebuild.
Image
Mavrelous
Forum Mod - Mavericks
Forum Mod - Mavericks
Posts: 19,223
And1: 16,994
Joined: Aug 20, 2020

Re: What should the Bucks plan be? 

Post#9 » by Mavrelous » Sat Jun 21, 2025 6:36 pm

2 options
1. I'd capitalize on NOP sucking amd tank this year
2. What the Bucks expert in thread considers talking out of our asses and target a bad contract who's healthy.
Defense wins draft lotteries!
Godaddycurse
RealGM
Posts: 21,790
And1: 13,739
Joined: Nov 13, 2019
 

Re: What should the Bucks plan be? 

Post#10 » by Godaddycurse » Sat Jun 21, 2025 6:45 pm

i think they should take on overpaid but productive 2 yr contracts to hard reset in FA when dame/kuzma both expires
esvl
Starter
Posts: 2,209
And1: 630
Joined: Jun 02, 2022
     

Re: What should the Bucks plan be? 

Post#11 » by esvl » Sat Jun 21, 2025 8:17 pm

Bucks should start building around Harper
User avatar
JayMKE
RealGM
Posts: 29,209
And1: 17,018
Joined: Jun 21, 2010
Location: LA
     

Re: What should the Bucks plan be? 

Post#12 » by JayMKE » Sat Jun 21, 2025 8:50 pm

esvl wrote:Bucks should start building around Harper


Not that kind of prospect
FREE GIANNIS
jakecronus8
RealGM
Posts: 16,668
And1: 8,094
Joined: Feb 06, 2006
     

Re: What should the Bucks plan be? 

Post#13 » by jakecronus8 » Sat Jun 21, 2025 9:28 pm

Do the gap year thing. Try to trade Connaughton (maybe Bobby if he opts in) for a 2 year bad money deal. Line all your non Giannis deals to come off with Dame and reevaluate at that time when you’ll also have more picks/swaps available.
Do it for Chuck
esvl
Starter
Posts: 2,209
And1: 630
Joined: Jun 02, 2022
     

Re: What should the Bucks plan be? 

Post#14 » by esvl » Sat Jun 21, 2025 9:31 pm

JayMKE wrote:
esvl wrote:Bucks should start building around Harper


Not that kind of prospect

Next year could be worse
Mamba4Goat
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 11,767
And1: 8,071
Joined: Dec 13, 2013
     

Re: What should the Bucks plan be? 

Post#15 » by Mamba4Goat » Sat Jun 21, 2025 9:39 pm

zimpy27 wrote:Keep Giannis, use exceptions under 1st apron, get new coach

0) Replace Doc with Thibs
1) resign Portis
2) use MLE partially on GTJ ($9m)
3) use BAE and rest of MLE on 2 $5m players
4) fill vet min until 14 players
5) play the season and wait for Lillard to return by playoffs


Food for thought but if they get a disabled player exception for Dame, would it be better to throw a large one year offer at a Naz Reid, FVV, etc. or go your route?

It could be helpful to use the $9mil for Trent for a more offensive creating wing like THJ, Kennard, LeVert, and so on too.
Rest in peace Mamba. There'll never be another Kobe.
User avatar
zimpy27
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 45,322
And1: 43,333
Joined: Jul 13, 2014

Re: What should the Bucks plan be? 

Post#16 » by zimpy27 » Sat Jun 21, 2025 11:50 pm

Mamba4Goat wrote:
zimpy27 wrote:Keep Giannis, use exceptions under 1st apron, get new coach

0) Replace Doc with Thibs
1) resign Portis
2) use MLE partially on GTJ ($9m)
3) use BAE and rest of MLE on 2 $5m players
4) fill vet min until 14 players
5) play the season and wait for Lillard to return by playoffs


Food for thought but if they get a disabled player exception for Dame, would it be better to throw a large one year offer at a Naz Reid, FVV, etc. or go your route?

It could be helpful to use the $9mil for Trent for a more offensive creating wing like THJ, Kennard, LeVert, and so on too.


DPE is maxed at MLE isn't it?
"Let's play some basketball!" - Fergie
Godaddycurse
RealGM
Posts: 21,790
And1: 13,739
Joined: Nov 13, 2019
 

Re: What should the Bucks plan be? 

Post#17 » by Godaddycurse » Sun Jun 22, 2025 12:00 am

zimpy27 wrote:
Mamba4Goat wrote:
zimpy27 wrote:Keep Giannis, use exceptions under 1st apron, get new coach

0) Replace Doc with Thibs
1) resign Portis
2) use MLE partially on GTJ ($9m)
3) use BAE and rest of MLE on 2 $5m players
4) fill vet min until 14 players
5) play the season and wait for Lillard to return by playoffs


Food for thought but if they get a disabled player exception for Dame, would it be better to throw a large one year offer at a Naz Reid, FVV, etc. or go your route?

It could be helpful to use the $9mil for Trent for a more offensive creating wing like THJ, Kennard, LeVert, and so on too.


DPE is maxed at MLE isn't it?


He cant come back for playoffs if they use dpe right?
User avatar
zimpy27
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 45,322
And1: 43,333
Joined: Jul 13, 2014

Re: What should the Bucks plan be? 

Post#18 » by zimpy27 » Sun Jun 22, 2025 12:05 am

Godaddycurse wrote:
zimpy27 wrote:
Mamba4Goat wrote:
Food for thought but if they get a disabled player exception for Dame, would it be better to throw a large one year offer at a Naz Reid, FVV, etc. or go your route?

It could be helpful to use the $9mil for Trent for a more offensive creating wing like THJ, Kennard, LeVert, and so on too.


DPE is maxed at MLE isn't it?


He cant come back for playoffs if they use dpe right?


He can, they just have to prove it's unlikely for him to come back. If he comes back early he can play.
"Let's play some basketball!" - Fergie
User avatar
Snakebites
Forum Mod - Pistons
Forum Mod - Pistons
Posts: 50,801
And1: 17,950
Joined: Jul 14, 2002
Location: Looking not-so-happily deranged
   

Re: What should the Bucks plan be? 

Post#19 » by Snakebites » Sun Jun 22, 2025 12:17 am

Giannis has not asked for a trade and they aren’t going to send him packing unless that happens. I get why some disagree with that approach but I don’t and it doesn’t matter.

Seems foolish to over invest in short term moves that only help next year. Do whatever you can to be in the best possible position to compete in 2026.

Is that particularly appealing? No. But it’s better than tanking without control of your own picks. Anything is better than that.

Return to Trades and Transactions