Sixers-Nets

[Mavrelous]

Noooo.... they just keep coming!

This is a trade board, they are supposed to keep coming...

There are other players to trade and I'm not sure if I've seen too may realistic trades for PG. I cannot see Sixers/Morey dumping PG to save money or open cap space at this time.

We do see them realistic, you don't get to tell people what to discuss and what not to discuss, you are welcome to tell us why we are wrong, which you're not doing, you're bitching and whining about the existence of trade suggestion, which is bizarre given where you choose to do that.

What are Sixers accomplishing by trading PG and #3 for #8 and Grant? If they want to compete, then PG is the better player than. If they want to build for the future, then they'd rather have #3 than #8.

Cap flexibility, Grant makes 20 millions less a year than PG13 and is 4 years younger, with the McCain surge Sixers could use less on-ball and more off-ball player on the forward position.

[Mavrelous]

Nets get PG13, #3, #11

Sixers get Jerami Grant, #8, #19

Blazers get CamJo, #22

I'd do this if BKN also sends the Sixers 28 1st top 8 protected 1st back.

I downgraded the #19 also:

Nets get PG13, #3, #11

Sixers get Jerami Grant, #8, #27, Sixers 28 1st

Blazers get CamJo, #22

[the_process]

Nets get PG13, #3, #11

Sixers get Jerami Grant, #8, #19

Blazers get CamJo, #22

I'd do this if BKN also sends the Sixers 28 1st top 8 protected 1st back.

I downgraded the #19 also:

Nets get PG13, #3, #11

Sixers get Jerami Grant, #8, #27, Sixers 28 1st

Blazers get CamJo, #22

Sixers get 22 and the Blazers get 26

[Mavrelous]

I'd do this if BKN also sends the Sixers 28 1st top 8 protected 1st back.

I downgraded the #19 also:

Nets get PG13, #3, #11

Sixers get Jerami Grant, #8, #27, Sixers 28 1st

Blazers get CamJo, #22

Sixers get 22 and the Blazers get 26

You'll make a good trader

[zaz102]

This is a trade board, they are supposed to keep coming...

There are other players to trade and I'm not sure if I've seen too may realistic trades for PG. I cannot see Sixers/Morey dumping PG to save money or open cap space at this time.

We do see them realistic, you don't get to tell people what to discuss and what not to discuss, you are welcome to tell us why we are wrong, which you're not doing, you're bitching and whining about the existence of trade suggestion, which is bizarre given where you choose to do that.

What are Sixers accomplishing by trading PG and #3 for #8 and Grant? If they want to compete, then PG is the better player than. If they want to build for the future, then they'd rather have #3 than #8.

Cap flexibility, Grant makes 20 millions less a year than PG13 and is 4 years younger, with the McCain surge Sixers could use less on-ball and more off-ball player on the forward position.

PG is better on-ball and off-ball than Grant and can transition to either role. What would Sixers do with that extra money? it's not saving them enough capsapce to sign a significant player. And if we're talking about future, I like the prospects much more at #3 than #8.

[Mavrelous]

PG is better on-ball and off-ball than Grant and can transition to either role. What would Sixers do with that extra money? it's not saving them enough capsapce to sign a significant player. And if we're talking about future, I like the prospects much more at #3 than #8.

OP details what the Sixers can do, sign Grimes and still have MLE and BAE to use.
Right now, just signing grimes to MLE sized deal and #3 pick + vet mins, and the Sixers will be at the 2nd Apron.

[louc1970]

For the Nets the trade would be very dependent on what the plan is for the other first round picks. If the Nets plan to keep them and grow, they will need some large salary (PG) on the team to spend the bottom line.