Wizards-Wolves

Moderators: BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger, MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck

Mamba4Goat
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 11,767
And1: 8,069
Joined: Dec 13, 2013
     

Wizards-Wolves 

Post#1 » by Mamba4Goat » Thu Jun 26, 2025 3:57 am

Wizards trade: one of their 2026 Was/Chi/Phx 2nds
Wolves trade: Leonard Miller


Why for Washington? Get a player with an interesting skill set for his size that could compliment Sarr.

Why for Minnesota? Get a 2nd back for a player who likely doesn’t have a future with the team after the Beringer pick.
Rest in peace Mamba. There'll never be another Kobe.
User avatar
SkyHook
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,935
And1: 3,259
Joined: Jun 24, 2002
 

Re: Wizards-Wolves 

Post#2 » by SkyHook » Thu Jun 26, 2025 4:00 am

Mamba4Goat wrote:Wizards trade: one of their 2026 Was/Chi/Phx 2nds
Wolves trade: Leonard Miller


Why for Washington? Get a player with an interesting skill set for his size that could compliment Sarr.

Why for Minnesota? Get a 2nd back for a player who likely doesn’t have a future with the team after the Beringer pick.


I'm still intrigued. If he's available, I'd want Utah to put forth an offer as well. Might get some competition there.
"When the mob and the press and the whole world tell you to move, your job is to plant yourself like a tree beside the river of truth, and tell the whole world...

... NO, YOU MOVE."
schaffy
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,884
And1: 354
Joined: Jun 20, 2007
       

Re: Wizards-Wolves 

Post#3 » by schaffy » Thu Jun 26, 2025 4:18 am

Miller has always seemed to be more of a project at 4 than a 5, so not sure I see a rush to move off him now just because they drafted a project 5 too.

Sent from my SM-S901U using RealGM mobile app
moss_is_1
RealGM
Posts: 10,971
And1: 2,385
Joined: May 20, 2009
   

Re: Wizards-Wolves 

Post#4 » by moss_is_1 » Thu Jun 26, 2025 6:14 am

I could see the Wolves doing it.
winforlose
RealGM
Posts: 13,019
And1: 5,663
Joined: Feb 27, 2020

Re: Wizards-Wolves 

Post#5 » by winforlose » Thu Jun 26, 2025 6:31 am

schaffy wrote:Miller has always seemed to be more of a project at 4 than a 5, so not sure I see a rush to move off him now just because they drafted a project 5 too.

Sent from my SM-S901U using RealGM mobile app


Presumptive Wolves roster (remember we only have 15 spots.)

PG: DDV/Dilly/Conley
SG: Ant//TSJ/DDV
SF: Jaden/Clark/Minott
PF: Randle/Naz/Minott
C: Gobert/JB/Garza

This takes away Jingles (waste of a roster spot,) NAW (hopefully get some assets in a sign and trade,) and Miller. We still have the tax payer MLE and pick 31. The above represents exactly 13 players, trading Miller for a pick and space makes sense. The alternative is trading Minott who a team not looking to win a chip this year might want to take a flyer on.
jscott
Veteran
Posts: 2,939
And1: 1,183
Joined: Oct 14, 2004
 

Re: Wizards-Wolves 

Post#6 » by jscott » Thu Jun 26, 2025 10:57 am

winforlose wrote:
schaffy wrote:Miller has always seemed to be more of a project at 4 than a 5, so not sure I see a rush to move off him now just because they drafted a project 5 too.

Sent from my SM-S901U using RealGM mobile app


Presumptive Wolves roster (remember we only have 15 spots.)

PG: DDV/Dilly/Conley
SG: Ant//TSJ/DDV
SF: Jaden/Clark/Minott
PF: Randle/Naz/Minott
C: Gobert/JB/Garza

This takes away Jingles (waste of a roster spot,) NAW (hopefully get some assets in a sign and trade,) and Miller. We still have the tax payer MLE and pick 31. The above represents exactly 13 players, trading Miller for a pick and space makes sense. The alternative is trading Minott who a team not looking to win a chip this year might want to take a flyer on.

Garza won’t be on the team next year.
User avatar
Domejandro
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Posts: 20,267
And1: 30,464
Joined: Jul 29, 2014

Re: Wizards-Wolves 

Post#7 » by Domejandro » Thu Jun 26, 2025 11:11 am

Worth consideration, at least. I would probably do it if it was conditioned as a "best of" second round draft pick.
schaffy
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,884
And1: 354
Joined: Jun 20, 2007
       

Re: Wizards-Wolves 

Post#8 » by schaffy » Thu Jun 26, 2025 12:38 pm

winforlose wrote:
schaffy wrote:Miller has always seemed to be more of a project at 4 than a 5, so not sure I see a rush to move off him now just because they drafted a project 5 too.

Sent from my SM-S901U using RealGM mobile app


Presumptive Wolves roster (remember we only have 15 spots.)

PG: DDV/Dilly/Conley
SG: Ant//TSJ/DDV
SF: Jaden/Clark/Minott
PF: Randle/Naz/Minott
C: Gobert/JB/Garza

This takes away Jingles (waste of a roster spot,) NAW (hopefully get some assets in a sign and trade,) and Miller. We still have the tax payer MLE and pick 31. The above represents exactly 13 players, trading Miller for a pick and space makes sense. The alternative is trading Minott who a team not looking to win a chip this year might want to take a flyer on.


I don't see Minott coming back. He might have started the sesson looking like a back end of the rotation guy but he certainly ended it as firmly stuck on the bench behind the TSJ and Clark. Probably time to move on.

Also everyone sure seems to love Joe in the locker room and that stuff matters over 82 games. If he wants to come back I'd sure do it. But that's totally up to him or if he's wants to do something else.

Sent from my SM-S901U using RealGM mobile app
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,256
And1: 19,266
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: Wizards-Wolves 

Post#9 » by shrink » Thu Jun 26, 2025 1:30 pm

I’d pass if I was MIN, if the price is just a second (which is fair).

MIN might not be able to get both Naz Reid and Randle to re-sign, and they have no other bigs on the roster except Gobert and Jaden McDaniels when he plays the 4. Leonard Miller is still an athletic prospect player, but he has been on the G-League, then Wolves system, so he’s more ready to contribute than new-to-hoops prospect Beringer.

The Wolves will likely handle their need for an actual (“vet”) back up center in trade, so it’s quite likely that Miller just goes the way of most second rounders, and teams lose them for nothing. But I like the protection of having a back up center who knows the system if Gobert or “new vet center” get hurt. That scenario is worth protecting against, even if the team doesn’t recoup a negligible second round pick.

Return to Trades and Transactions