Lakers and Blazers, Lakers fill some holes

Moderators: BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger, MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck

JRoy
RealGM
Posts: 16,454
And1: 13,800
Joined: Feb 27, 2019
 

Re: Lakers and Blazers, Lakers fill some holes 

Post#21 » by JRoy » Sat Jul 5, 2025 8:59 pm

nzahir wrote:
JRoy wrote:Pass.

Keep your scrubs, well keep our walking IL.

And this is why Portland continues to be irrelevant

Not trading expirings who aren’t part of the future for a guy who was drafted #17 and should’ve been drafted earlier is a bad move

Not trading Grant and demanding 1sts is laughable


Right, Knecht is the secret sauce.

He doesn’t look like anything special to me, but another year might change that.

No problem moving expirings for the right deal.
Edrees wrote:
JRoy wrote:Monta Ellis have it all


I was hoping and expecting this to be one of the first replies. You did not disappoint. Jroy have it all.
DiegoChara
Junior
Posts: 466
And1: 532
Joined: Jun 09, 2023
       

Re: Lakers and Blazers, Lakers fill some holes 

Post#22 » by DiegoChara » Sat Jul 5, 2025 9:21 pm

nzahir wrote:
JRoy wrote:Pass.

Keep your scrubs, well keep our walking IL.

And this is why Portland continues to be irrelevant

Not trading expirings who aren’t part of the future for a guy who was drafted #17 and should’ve been drafted earlier is a bad move

Not trading Grant and demanding 1sts is laughable


Comtinuing to bring up Grant, who has nothing to do with this, and taking shots at Portland’s “irrelevance” is weirdly antagonistic for such a low stakes discussion.

Maybe chill out.

Return to Trades and Transactions