Cavs/Portland

Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger

bgrep14
Analyst
Posts: 3,025
And1: 293
Joined: Jun 14, 2009

Cavs/Portland 

Post#1 » by bgrep14 » Wed Aug 13, 2025 9:00 pm

Portland: Murray and Reath
Portland: Wade

Cavs: Wade
Cavs: Murray and Reath

Cavs get some depth at Center and maybe SF/PF

Portland gets a PF that can space the floor
JRoy
RealGM
Posts: 16,606
And1: 13,968
Joined: Feb 27, 2019
 

Re: Cavs/Portland 

Post#2 » by JRoy » Wed Aug 13, 2025 9:38 pm

Pass for POR.

That leaves only Clingan and Yang at C and no PF with the beef to slide over. The value looks good but do t think the fit works.
Edrees wrote:
JRoy wrote:Monta Ellis have it all


I was hoping and expecting this to be one of the first replies. You did not disappoint. Jroy have it all.
toooskies
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,167
And1: 2,508
Joined: Jul 18, 2013
     

Re: Cavs/Portland 

Post#3 » by toooskies » Wed Aug 13, 2025 10:38 pm

JRoy wrote:Pass for POR.

That leaves only Clingan and Yang at C and no PF with the beef to slide over. The value looks good but do t think the fit works.

You still have Timelord, and Wade can play spot minutes in small ball lineups at the m5.

You could also sign a washed vet to a minimum if you want more depth. Probably a better backup for those two than Reath, who is still fighting to have a career.
JRoy
RealGM
Posts: 16,606
And1: 13,968
Joined: Feb 27, 2019
 

Re: Cavs/Portland 

Post#4 » by JRoy » Wed Aug 13, 2025 10:55 pm

toooskies wrote:
JRoy wrote:Pass for POR.

That leaves only Clingan and Yang at C and no PF with the beef to slide over. The value looks good but do t think the fit works.

You still have Timelord, and Wade can play spot minutes in small ball lineups at the m5.

You could also sign a washed vet to a minimum if you want more depth. Probably a better backup for those two than Reath, who is still fighting to have a career.


Even I have reached the point where I don’t consider RW playing significant time.

Too bad, very nice player.
Edrees wrote:
JRoy wrote:Monta Ellis have it all


I was hoping and expecting this to be one of the first replies. You did not disappoint. Jroy have it all.
tester551
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,551
And1: 1,264
Joined: Jan 10, 2005
Location: Missing the Coast & Trees

Re: Cavs/Portland 

Post#5 » by tester551 » Wed Aug 13, 2025 11:21 pm

bgrep14 wrote:Portland: Murray and Reath
Portland: Wade

Cavs: Wade
Cavs: Murray and Reath

Cavs get some depth at Center and maybe SF/PF

Portland gets a PF that can space the floor

I like the trade for Portland.

The BIG issue that I see is this would put Blazers JUST below the tax with 14 roster spots. Signing a vet minimum contract to fill out the roster would push them into the tax.... which is not going to happen for a lotto team.

[Blazers currently sit ~$1.5M below tax. Reath + Murray is ~$5.3M out and Wade would be ~$6.6M in. Portland would then be ~$200k below tax after the trade with 14 roster spots filled].
jbk1234
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 58,908
And1: 35,990
Joined: Dec 22, 2010
 

Re: Cavs/Portland 

Post#6 » by jbk1234 » Wed Aug 13, 2025 11:27 pm

I don't think the Cavs should trade Wade, but I'd be fine with this.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
OutsidetheNBA
Senior
Posts: 657
And1: 382
Joined: Sep 15, 2020
 

Re: Cavs/Portland 

Post#7 » by OutsidetheNBA » Thu Aug 14, 2025 2:29 pm

I like the deal for Portland, even if it does functionally limit them to 14 rostered players + 10 days.
Myth
RealGM
Posts: 11,804
And1: 10,453
Joined: Oct 01, 2008
   

Re: Cavs/Portland 

Post#8 » by Myth » Thu Aug 14, 2025 2:41 pm

tester551 wrote:
bgrep14 wrote:Portland: Murray and Reath
Portland: Wade

Cavs: Wade
Cavs: Murray and Reath

Cavs get some depth at Center and maybe SF/PF

Portland gets a PF that can space the floor

I like the trade for Portland.

The BIG issue that I see is this would put Blazers JUST below the tax with 14 roster spots. Signing a vet minimum contract to fill out the roster would push them into the tax.... which is not going to happen for a lotto team.

[Blazers currently sit ~$1.5M below tax. Reath + Murray is ~$5.3M out and Wade would be ~$6.6M in. Portland would then be ~$200k below tax after the trade with 14 roster spots filled].

Thanks for checking the numbers. This was my concern as well. I knew they were already close to the line, so taking on salary (even a little) while opening a roster gap makes it hard to fill.
BlazersBroncos
RealGM
Posts: 12,370
And1: 9,919
Joined: Oct 27, 2016

Re: Cavs/Portland 

Post#9 » by BlazersBroncos » Thu Aug 14, 2025 3:36 pm

As others have said - really like the deal for Portland but it caps them at 14 rostered players which likely would make it tough to do.

Return to Trades and Transactions