Portland: Murray and Reath
Portland: Wade
Cavs: Wade
Cavs: Murray and Reath
Cavs get some depth at Center and maybe SF/PF
Portland gets a PF that can space the floor
Cavs/Portland
Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger
Re: Cavs/Portland
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,606
- And1: 13,968
- Joined: Feb 27, 2019
-
Re: Cavs/Portland
Pass for POR.
That leaves only Clingan and Yang at C and no PF with the beef to slide over. The value looks good but do t think the fit works.
That leaves only Clingan and Yang at C and no PF with the beef to slide over. The value looks good but do t think the fit works.
Edrees wrote:JRoy wrote:Monta Ellis have it all
I was hoping and expecting this to be one of the first replies. You did not disappoint. Jroy have it all.
Re: Cavs/Portland
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,167
- And1: 2,508
- Joined: Jul 18, 2013
-
Re: Cavs/Portland
JRoy wrote:Pass for POR.
That leaves only Clingan and Yang at C and no PF with the beef to slide over. The value looks good but do t think the fit works.
You still have Timelord, and Wade can play spot minutes in small ball lineups at the m5.
You could also sign a washed vet to a minimum if you want more depth. Probably a better backup for those two than Reath, who is still fighting to have a career.
Re: Cavs/Portland
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,606
- And1: 13,968
- Joined: Feb 27, 2019
-
Re: Cavs/Portland
toooskies wrote:JRoy wrote:Pass for POR.
That leaves only Clingan and Yang at C and no PF with the beef to slide over. The value looks good but do t think the fit works.
You still have Timelord, and Wade can play spot minutes in small ball lineups at the m5.
You could also sign a washed vet to a minimum if you want more depth. Probably a better backup for those two than Reath, who is still fighting to have a career.
Even I have reached the point where I don’t consider RW playing significant time.
Too bad, very nice player.
Edrees wrote:JRoy wrote:Monta Ellis have it all
I was hoping and expecting this to be one of the first replies. You did not disappoint. Jroy have it all.
Re: Cavs/Portland
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,551
- And1: 1,264
- Joined: Jan 10, 2005
- Location: Missing the Coast & Trees
Re: Cavs/Portland
bgrep14 wrote:Portland: Murray and Reath
Portland: Wade
Cavs: Wade
Cavs: Murray and Reath
Cavs get some depth at Center and maybe SF/PF
Portland gets a PF that can space the floor
I like the trade for Portland.
The BIG issue that I see is this would put Blazers JUST below the tax with 14 roster spots. Signing a vet minimum contract to fill out the roster would push them into the tax.... which is not going to happen for a lotto team.
[Blazers currently sit ~$1.5M below tax. Reath + Murray is ~$5.3M out and Wade would be ~$6.6M in. Portland would then be ~$200k below tax after the trade with 14 roster spots filled].
Re: Cavs/Portland
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 58,908
- And1: 35,990
- Joined: Dec 22, 2010
-
Re: Cavs/Portland
I don't think the Cavs should trade Wade, but I'd be fine with this.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Re: Cavs/Portland
-
- Senior
- Posts: 657
- And1: 382
- Joined: Sep 15, 2020
-
Re: Cavs/Portland
I like the deal for Portland, even if it does functionally limit them to 14 rostered players + 10 days.
Re: Cavs/Portland
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,804
- And1: 10,453
- Joined: Oct 01, 2008
-
Re: Cavs/Portland
tester551 wrote:bgrep14 wrote:Portland: Murray and Reath
Portland: Wade
Cavs: Wade
Cavs: Murray and Reath
Cavs get some depth at Center and maybe SF/PF
Portland gets a PF that can space the floor
I like the trade for Portland.
The BIG issue that I see is this would put Blazers JUST below the tax with 14 roster spots. Signing a vet minimum contract to fill out the roster would push them into the tax.... which is not going to happen for a lotto team.
[Blazers currently sit ~$1.5M below tax. Reath + Murray is ~$5.3M out and Wade would be ~$6.6M in. Portland would then be ~$200k below tax after the trade with 14 roster spots filled].
Thanks for checking the numbers. This was my concern as well. I knew they were already close to the line, so taking on salary (even a little) while opening a roster gap makes it hard to fill.
Re: Cavs/Portland
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,370
- And1: 9,919
- Joined: Oct 27, 2016
Re: Cavs/Portland
As others have said - really like the deal for Portland but it caps them at 14 rostered players which likely would make it tough to do.
Return to Trades and Transactions