Wolves Bucks after Ware can aggregate

Moderators: loserX, HartfordWhalers, Trader_Joe, Texas Chuck, Andre Roberstan, pacers33granger, Mamba4Goat, MoneyTalks41890

User avatar
Texas Chuck
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 95,692
And1: 103,455
Joined: May 19, 2012
Location: Purgatory
   

Re: Wolves Bucks after Ware can aggregate 

Post#41 » by Texas Chuck » Sat Jul 25, 2026 4:47 pm

I see, the issue is not multiple different posters making statements that I quoted, its me being obtuse.

If it was one poster I'd write it off as more Giannis nonsense. But when its multiple posters, its pretty clear its not intended as hyperbole. Somehow you managed to convince yourselves Gobert for free awful, terrible, pointless. But Turner on a big number despite having much less impact, a key piece, very valuable, you must pay us heavily to get him.

Which means collectively values are being set not based on the player, but simply the team the player currently plays on. That's not a me issue fwiw. Not that you care or will even be able to see it.
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
User avatar
JayMKE
RealGM
Posts: 30,680
And1: 18,566
Joined: Jun 21, 2010
Location: LA
     

Re: Wolves Bucks after Ware can aggregate 

Post#42 » by JayMKE » Sat Jul 25, 2026 5:15 pm

Texas Chuck wrote:I see, the issue is not multiple different posters making statements that I quoted, its me being obtuse.

If it was one poster I'd write it off as more Giannis nonsense. But when its multiple posters, its pretty clear its not intended as hyperbole. Somehow you managed to convince yourselves Gobert for free awful, terrible, pointless. But Turner on a big number despite having much less impact, a key piece, very valuable, you must pay us heavily to get him.

Which means collectively values are being set not based on the player, but simply the team the player currently plays on. That's not a me issue fwiw. Not that you care or will even be able to see it.


Reread the post and try again because that’s not what I said. Unless Gobert is literally available for free then it’s a hyperbolic statement. If he was free then I’d take him and move him for value. It’s splitting hairs and just a dumb topic of conversation when taken literally as per usual. Weird strawman and non-sequitur with Turner too, Bucks not valuing a salary dump for Turner doesn’t logically follow the flipside being that the team should “upgrade” to Gobert. Nobody has said that he’s a core piece or has immense value. The Bucks are definitely not attaching Ware to move him. That’s just dumb.
FREE GIANNIS
User avatar
Texas Chuck
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 95,692
And1: 103,455
Joined: May 19, 2012
Location: Purgatory
   

Re: Wolves Bucks after Ware can aggregate 

Post#43 » by Texas Chuck » Sat Jul 25, 2026 6:12 pm

Cool, side stepping again. I didn't bring Gobert for free into conversation, you and other Bucks posters did. If you don't like that, don't bring it up yourself and get on to the posters who did.

All I did was point out the absurdity of two positions being held at the same time that can't possibly be held objectively. Just own it or ignore me, but stop putting it on me--you guys brought that up.

And I've never said they should trade Ware for Gobert. You like to get mad at me for stuff I'm not doing lol.
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
User avatar
JayMKE
RealGM
Posts: 30,680
And1: 18,566
Joined: Jun 21, 2010
Location: LA
     

Re: Wolves Bucks after Ware can aggregate 

Post#44 » by JayMKE » Sat Jul 25, 2026 8:06 pm

Texas Chuck wrote:Cool, side stepping again. I didn't bring Gobert for free into conversation, you and other Bucks posters did. If you don't like that, don't bring it up yourself and get on to the posters who did.

All I did was point out the absurdity of two positions being held at the same time that can't possibly be held objectively. Just own it or ignore me, but stop putting it on me--you guys brought that up.

And I've never said they should trade Ware for Gobert. You like to get mad at me for stuff I'm not doing lol.


lol as if, wtf do I have to with someone else’s opinion? So likewise brotha! I can be condescending too. I think my opinion towards Turner and Gobert makes perfect sense and quite frankly idk what your opinion even is here, it just seems like you took a shot at Bucks fans then started obfuscating. Are you even disagreeing with me? :lol:
FREE GIANNIS

Return to Trades and Transactions